/tech/ - Technology★

>>942282 (OP)

>>942285

You are the cancer that is killing /tech/. You need to leave this place immediately and kill yourselves too. Most posters here aren't larping faggots but productive individuals too busy changing the world to post here often.

There are many other boards you can ruin and from which you will probably derive greater entertainment. I recommend /pol/. But I think it would really be better if you just killed yourselves for ruining this board.

Also, reported for admitting such faggotry.

I became so proficient at LARPing that I sneaked in one of the Google datacenters and fucked around with mainframes fam. True story.

>>942282 (OP)

I'll only admit to shilling for various flavors of Linux while never actually having used anything but Windows 7 in my entire life. I do read about them on distrowatch before I shill though. Sage for not really /tech/.

I don't see a point in lying on the internet to people I will never actually know, especially when it could waste a significant amount of their time. That just seems pointlessly harmful, purely malicious even if not intended to be.

You aren't fooling anyone. It is plainly obvious when non-experts talk about stuff they aren't experts in. Experience is everything. If you haven't done it, shut your mouth.

>>942303

Face it, this whole board if fake. It's all one big larp by OP and other losers.

You've been bamboozled!

>>942287

You understand this is just the same tripfags that were here shitting up the board last week, right? They're just posting bait because they're butthurt and no one is giving them attention on /metatech/ anymore.

>>942306

There's a /metatech/? Why not just have a /metatech/ thread on /tech/?

>>942311

I don't know ask the BO. It's probably just because he's a faggot. At least he got rid of the tripfags.

>>942300

>especially when it could waste a significant amount of their time

You just did.

>>942316

>A single line

>significant amount of time

Wew lad.

>>942282 (OP)

>Who else here has posted comments, and even made entire thread on /tech/ about various programming languages without ever having coded a single line in their lives in any language?

>Who else here has waxed poetic about the virtues of ksh vs bash, never having actually touched a command line?

All i can say is you speak for yourself only. This is not true for all /tech/ users if it is true for you.

>>942316

You chose this. You wanted this.

>>942282 (OP)

I think it's more likely that we're mostly a bunch of kids that downloaded clode::blocks in high-school and then worked in a gas station for the rest of their lives while working on some Otaku culture posting program that they never released.

For what purpose? You can't even get e-peen since you're anonymous. Or are you a tripfag in disguise?

>>942287

>too busy changing the world

I don't larp, but speak for yourself. I don't make anything even slightly important or impressive, and most of the shit I do make doesn't leave my own network.

Not I. I'm an expert in javascript

>>942302

Who’s that guy

>>942520

He created the C programming language, And along with Ken Thompson he also made the UNIX operating system.

>>942302

>filename

Nice try

>>942520

Denis Ritchie, he created the C programming language and was one of the creators/developers of UNIX

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Ritchie

>>942597

>I am too much of a retard to manually manage memory

Stick to C# and other designated shitting languages Kumar

I can only code in elisp

>>942292

>while never actually having used anything but Windows 7 in my entire life.

You must be 18 years or older to post here.