/tech/ - Technology★

>>938847 (OP)

Gee, boy, it’s another Twitter “killer”!

>>938856

It's not a Twitter killer, fedi is an everything killer:

Mastodon and Pleroma replace Twitter

PixelFed replaces Instagram

FunkWhale replaces SoundCloud

Frendica replaces Facebook

(there are other ones but they're too small to mention)

Fedi basically bootstraps any social network with content and prevents censorship.

>>938893

>Mastodon

Supporting a software that was heavily shilled by media and backed up by MS puppets.

>>938898

Mastodon is SJW/Kike cancerspace.

Use Matrix (FOSS) instead like #tech:matrix.ordoevangelistarum.com

>>938898

Fuck mastodon for trying to turn gnu social into a walled garden lefty safespace.

>>938901

>I don't understand how fedi works

Nigger just use a node that doesn't have SJWs, and anyway Pleroma doesn't have this issue, hence why I'm recommending it.

>>938904

>Walled garden

I don't think you know what that means

>>938905

MatrixOE has a bigger and more trusted network than Fedi, with many organizations like American Federalists using it as a base.

>>938903

Nope but I'm not mad to the point of not supporting someone like eugene. Thanks to his recklessness which he has been warned SEVERAL times by SEVERAL people he turned the fediverse into twitter 2.0.

Blocklists did not exist before him.

Content warnings did not exist before him.

Separatists did not exists before him.

non "Private" Message did not exist before him.

Datamining on the fediverse did not exist before him.

He is the central conjuncture of several problems because he's a influence greedy ideological young cokemonkey idiot.

>>938893

Fedi can't kill DIscord (Matrix/OrdoEvangelistarum)

It can't kill Youtube either (PewTube, DTube, Bitchute)

It can't kill Tumblr (GhostCMS is the closest)

>>938912

Eugene sucks, but for none of the reasons you listed.

All of that stuff is useful if not standard for a social media site, I don't know about you but I don't want loli on my timeline when I'm on public transport and you can turn off all content warnings.

What issue could you possibly have with blocklists, private messaging.

And what do you even mean by 'datamining'? What super secret data is being sent to his lair?

Separatists are inevitable with any networked libre software project once it gets big, their existence only speaks to its size.

>>938914

Hasn't yet != Can't

>>938919

Format differences, my friend. If the format is WRONG, then replacing it is impossible.

>>938924

Changes in format are done incrementally, first came Dtube etc and now we have PeerTube and we'll probably have something even better later.

>>938925

The principles baked in human interactions are all wrong though. Discord is made for cliques, Twitter is made for graffiti and whining, YouTube is made for video, Whatsapp/Telegram is made or one-on-one communications, and Amino is made for fandoms as an all-in-one package

>>938886

I think you've got it backwards, /leftypol/ is the one pushing forced memes and scrambling after /pol/'s table scraps.

>>938929

tripfags knows no bounds, they should just fuck off

>>938926

>Telegram is made for one on one communication

Please explain how literally no one uses it for that, it's all meme channels a group chats.

>>938934

Then use Whatsapp as a better example of "SMS replacements"

>>938918

>All of that stuff is useful if not standard for a social media site

Standard in the likes of twatter ? I highly disagree.

There "useful" stuff doesn't mean that it's useful to others or even that is as real benefice to the person who "likes" using it.

>I don't know about you but I don't want loli on my timeline when I'm on public

NSFW is the only kind of warning that is reasonable, otherwise if you let the users have their own content warning it becomes a clusterfuck of bullshit to read in the timeline.

>What issue could you possibly have with blocklists,

I see that you do not have enough knowledge to even grasp the problem that these two represents.

First blocklists goes against the principals of what is a federation. But it is also a solution to corner cases like spamming thus in this case it's a reasonable way to use it.

But is this reasonable ?

https://github.com/WitchesTown/InstanceInternals/blob/master/Blocklist.md or this https://github.com/tootcafe/blocked-instances

Blocklists creates walled garden for people, it's that kind of tool that creates people who say

>how dare you talk/send me a message

on a publicly available space.

It was also reinforced by the fact that eugene still does not have a public timeline without any subscription.

Plus when people are gullible to someone else it creates this

telegra.ph/Instances-to-silencesuspend-on-Mastodon-06-23

This autistic (or paid shill) even added Raptor Engineering on it's list. For me all of this is a sign that the fediverse is being attacked by external entities and only pushed eugene bullshit forwards.

Not letting people having the choice to speak with each other is a mind killer, it is what creates, reinforces, and pushes separatist/tribal movements/way of thinking.

>If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence.

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Louis_Brandeis

>private messaging.

Don't you see the problem in "private messaging" ? on a "Public network" ?

There's nothing private about them the admins of the servers will be able to see/use the content regardless of the word private but most users won't even know that it is not private

>And what do you even mean by 'datamining'?

https://mastodon.social/terms

https://media.ccc.de/v/33c3-8414-corporate_surveillance_digital_tracking_big_data_privacy

>What super secret data is being sent to his lair?

>implying only "secret" data needs to be protected

Public doesn't mean it's legal for an entity to copy and use data that someone posted. If people knew the basics about copyright they would know that per default what they post is theirs (it's proprietary) and not someone else, excepts when the users agrees to the "terms of condition and use" to share "data" and "data" can be anything.

>Separatists are inevitable

I do not agree separatist can be a minority or not.

I don't give a dam when people want to make a "private" space but when it's public and the sole purpose of the federation is to let people choose to communicate with each other or not it's not up the admin to tell it's userbase to who and who can communicate with each other.

>>938929

At the very least not in this case. OPs pic was just as cancerous as a ben garrison cartoon. Back to boomer hell where you belong.

>>938947

If SJWs don't want to be exposed to certain content I don't care so long as said people can still speak.

As for private messaging it does the job for now, even if admins can see it, maybe some sort of encryption should be added later.

>>938847 (OP)

All social media is bad. Don't use it.

>>938972

social media is only a new term. websites, newsgroups, and bbs's were social media before the term even existed.

>>938847 (OP)

>Not GDPR ready.

>>938985

Hit the gas.

>>939007

Not really, it is just shit ton of UI, de-botnet it and it still is "social media".

>>939070

Can't de-botnet those things. If it could work in a simple html browser, then maybe something can be done. A small, simple browser has a chance of working on old hardware that isn't botnet.

>>938985

If it doesn't botnet your ass, and allows you to actually delete your account, it's GDPR ready tbh

>>939117

>press Delete Account

>your data is still on the server

>>939136

Well then it's not GDPR compliant, and it's buttnut. Simple.

>>938847 (OP)

Because I don't have autism.

>>939098

Well try make a Tumblr-like blog that can do that, or a twitter that does only clean CSS.

>>939148

>Implying lobbying can't jew that open

>>939258

Then why are you here?

Don't you know only niggers use "Social Media"?

>muh GDPR

kill yourselves

>>938847 (OP)

WoW, an open source alternative to something I don't use anyway and have no desire to use. Cool.

>>939359

And Spics, kikes, soyboys and cucks. What else is new?

>>938847 (OP)

what would i do there?

>pleroma

>sounds like some time of a cancer

No one cares about your "social media" app unless everyone else is using it. Mastodon and whatever this is will remain irrelevant, no matter how free and open source they are. Just make a personal website and use email. I'm sorry but this is the hard truth.

>>938847 (OP)

Doing secure things in browser is stupid. You need a standalone application for it, even "social media" or whatever jewish buzzword of millennia it is.

Microblogs are for 89IQ retards like Trump, based black people, teenage girls, antifa and general American audiences. There is no point in copying something inferior for the sake of having a copy.

>>938901

Matrix is a shitty centralized Jabber with http as transport and json instead of xml. There is no point in copying something what already works, works good and doesn't execute javascripts sent by a malicious contact because instant messaging client is not a browser, but certain venture capital firms keep thinking it is.

>>938947

If you post something online, i.e. it is accessible on Internet on one of the ports search engine crawlers check, then do not expect it to be "private". If it is a public web page, it can be scraped and therefore it is not private. If it's a closed garden "social media" website, or "you have to be registered to view links and images" kind of web-forum, it is still not private, just waiting for you to pass a few deanonymizing hops, unless you run the software on your hardware and gives access to selected group of people.

>copyright

It's a spook, m8. Nobody is inclined to care about your fee-fees when transferring onesies and nullies over a network of computers, it's a zero effort operation from bald ape's standpoint and can be repeated countless number of times until no need for such information is present.

>>938912

You should not expose your data to people you don't trust at all, that's it. Want it to be "private", but still have to use third party for transfers, encrypt the damn shit. Having "private" person-to-person messages as a side feature on forums or facebook is an obsolete feature from early unix mainframes and then bbses.

>>939796

Shitpost profusely and alot of free software people are on there.

>>939800 (checked)

Social media apps become massive when they are required in order to do something, Twitter had that thing where they let you get your Tweet on a big screen at some event and as soon as a single Fedi project does something like that (and since the number of them is growing rapidly the chance is higher) it will be flooded with content and users.

>>939821

> There is no point in copying something what already works, works good and doesn't execute javascripts sent by a malicious contact because instant messaging client is not a browser, but certain venture capital firms keep thinking it is.

They are making a Go implementation, having bridge diversity and JSON > XML

>>939821

>retards like Trump

He has done fairly well in life for a retard. Perhaps you're just bitter about losing an election.

>>942336

He is salty, but you are a kike lover for supporting Trump, so yeah.

>>942336

So do Jews, what's your point?

>>939821

>you post something online, i.e. it is accessible on Internet on one of the ports search engine crawlers check, then do not expect it to be "private". If it is a public web page, it can be scraped and therefore it is not private

That was already stated in the post in the lines

>it's that kind of tool that creates people who say

>how dare you talk/send me a message

>on a publicly available space.

>Nobody is inclined to care about your fee-fees when transferring onesies and nullies over a network of computers

What are companies.jpg. Companies do care about the law otherwise we would have seen Microsoft implement gpl software long ago, otherwise I agree people can do whatever they want as long the copyright older does not legally complain.

>t's a zero effort operation from bald ape's standpoint and can be repeated countless number of times until no need for such information is present.

I agree with that but the point still stands people who post things even in public spaces have automatically their copyright on it (except if there was a eula that said you authorized them to do X).

>You should not expose your data to people you don't trust at all

Why are you replying to this ? Obviously the anon you respond to is aware of that.

>>942570

>I agree people can do whatever they want as long the copyright older does not legally complain.

Does that mean murder is fine because the victim can't complain afterwards? You forget that the State has a right to prosecute any crime regardless of the petitioner.

>>938906

Fuck you, nigger. Masto exists to cater to hypochondriac she-twinks and whalekin, and Eugene has spent most of his development time figuring out new and innovative ways to block out the rest of the Fediverse. #punchjaps

You don't know shit. Suck my cock.

anyway everybody should get on spc

Trust a former fedi user.

The whole fediverse was destroyed when Mastodon came along. Now it's just homosexual furries.

Even the people who were once good shitposters have adopted their garbage styles.

Use Matrix or IRC. Fedi isn't worth it.

>>939830

Not him but "social" websites have nothing to offer people who are at the bottom of the social pyramid. Might as well shitpost on file:///dev/null, it's faster and has the same number of people reading.

>>945129

REKT.

>>942570

>Copyright

You seem to be lost

>>938847 (OP)

>social

Having a social media account is basically providing a "here's a bunch of arbitrary reasons to get me fired" list to any chimp with a chip on their shoulder.

>>945123

you forgot (((the others)))

>>939833

Twitter was pushed by the media. It wasn't an organic growth it was pure marketing and then it was just there so people used it.

All these chat programs turn into the same shit holes. It's just people posting memes and "ironic shit posting" which is just a facebook group or you get the alt right spergs. I don't mean people like /pol/ here, I mean the actual alt right spergs. The kids who think they know the TRUTH MAN but get all their info from TRS or Sargon type podcasts. It's the same crowd who were on Gab and then Voat. They sing and dance about how important freedom of speech is and now they're saving Western civilization and then call you a nutjob if you point out anything to do with the deep state or the Jewish control behind the system.

>>945718

So you can't name the jews?