>>907359
honestly I have no idea how long it would take. My brain-logic is that it would be easier to do it on RISC-V, as it's a simpler architecture than the CISC x86, but idk
>unless most of the tests are not platform specific
I do know that parts of the seL4 codebase are written in assembly specifically for each architcture, so I imagine it does have to be platform specific.
>I'm itching for a fullstack of efficient, open, and secure platforms.
Me too! Thinking about it gets me sooo excited ^.^
>I really just want RISC+microkernel for power efficiency + uptime. Everything else is a bonus.
Genode actually supports multiple kernels, almost all of them being microkernels.
From the website:
>Kernels: most members of the L4 family (NOVA, seL4, Fiasco.OC, OKL4 v2.1, L4ka::Pistachio, L4/Fiasco), Linux, the Muen separation kernel, and a custom kernel.
Also, I read some academic paper about L4 in general, and the original idea was actually made to help remedy the overhead/performace issues of microkernels to a certain extent. They're not exactly on par with monolithic kernels, but they should be close enough in modern implementations.