>>902740
>delegalization of
Good lord, you could have just said "banning" and saved 5 syllables.
As you allude to in your follow-up post, "democratic" governments prefer soft power techniques for population control. So they won't necessarily ban or publicly backdoor encryption outright, but they'll try to scare people with tales of how the bad guys are "going dark", and they'll fuck with NIST standards, put infiltrators in place in important certificate authorities, bribe companies like RSA to weaken their crypto, hijack downloads of security/commsec software, poison baseband firmware on phones, etc. Of course, the U.S. government, and probably GCHQ and some others, store exabytes of encrypted communications, much of which will be vulnerable to decryption if sufficiently resourced nation-state agencies ever obtain good quantum computers.