[–]▶ No.885361>>885383 >>885434 >>886177 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
im about 40 or so yards from a newly renovated mcdonalds and getting a really solid signal on my phone(which has a terrible antenna) not sure if 5GHz or 2.4
anyway isnt it dangerous to have this highly populated radio wave atmosphere?
seems like there are too many channel options and there should just be one antenna in a single city if thats not the case...https://youtu.be/AmT8pPwH6qk
this guy seems to think so.
honestly im not an expert but i have read quite a bit more than the average wifi user and i see these towers everywhere. have you seen the gauge wire they use to amplify the beaconing signal? its 2-3 in diameter.
let me know what u think
▶ No.885365>>885608
Everyone and their grandma AND her dog is setting up wireless networks these days (and guess what, they almost always set them to full transmit power for "muh optimal coverage"). Literally nobody cares about his signal being electromagnetic smog to everyone else around them. The only solution at this point seems to be to move innawoods or somesuch, as you can't force anybody to shut their signal off or even to attenuate its power levels.
▶ No.885366>>885383 >>885434 >>885496 >>885533 >>885754 >>885774
>RF
>non-ionizing radiation
>dangerous
▶ No.885367>>885455 >>885635
Except wifi is microwaves and not RF.
▶ No.885383>>885389 >>885496 >>885754 >>886196
>>885361 (OP)
You'll get more damage from the Sun than any wifi radiation, which as >>885366 correctly said, is non-ionizing. During the 5g rollout, expect a lot of retards to warn you of impending doom like pic related, but this is just fear mongering.
▶ No.885389>>885395
>>885383
>non-ionizing
stick your head into a microwave. don't worry, it's non-ionizing.
▶ No.885395>>885400 >>885434 >>885438 >>885533 >>885754
>>885389
Wifi does not produce a 1000W signal at the resonant frequency of water towards my face
Stop this FUD, wifi is shit because it's insecure and lazy, not because it's "muh cancer"
Eat some greens dickhead
▶ No.885400
>>885395
rustfag wants you to get cancer from these cancer signals
Eat some meat rustfag, and not the black meat your butthole eats on a regular basis.
▶ No.885434>>885563
>>885361 (OP)
>>885366
>>885395
actually Microwaves (even 4G/5G) can be dangerous for your health as it dries your cells. but if you don't use your phone 24/7 then it's ok.
▶ No.885438>>885536 >>885563
>>885395
>Wifi does not produce a 1000W signal at the resonant frequency of water
Neither does a microwave oven. If a microwave oven operated at one of the resonant frequency /frequencies of water it would just heat the outside of whatever you put in there and have no penetrating power. Water is polar and so the molecules spin an electromagnetic field no matter what frequency that field is. ~2.4GHz was mainly chosen because it was in the middle of an ISM band.
▶ No.885455>>885916
>>885367
Did you ride the short bus to school?
▶ No.885496>>885563 >>885592
>>885366
>non-ionizing radiation
I guess that Nancy Wertheimer and her colleagues were wrong then.
>>885383
>You'll get more damage from the Sun than any wifi radiation
Just remember to put you're wifi-scream just like you put sun-scream
Anyway besides all the fud that comes from each sides TV, modern food and Marxists schools are more dangerous than wavelength on short term.
▶ No.885533>>885563
>>885366
>>885395
ok but look at the reaction from this thread.
why cant people be talking about this?
and yet everyone has a galaxy s8 or iphone and they cant tell ask us to make a devision about the safety from radio waves?
its not even about them making money
▶ No.885536
>>885438
do u work at sprint lol
guys, phones and towers work because they both transmit and receive a particular wavelength.
the companies shouldnt be trying to sell us a signal or a number. instead they should let the technology sell itself. thats why you get this seperation between real techies/hackers and reddit fags.
▶ No.885562
Rf signals are not dangerous
▶ No.885563>>885572
>>885438
ok, so I did make a bit of a mistake, you are correct that 2.4 GHz was specifically chosen due to frequency regulation and HAMfaggots, but 2.4 GHz EMR is absorbed readily by fats, oils and water, the three main culprits of yucky food.
>>885533
because we have other things we would like to talk about
>no penetration
source?
>>885496
(((Wertheimer)))
>>885434
where are the proofs?
▶ No.885572
>>885563
>(((Wertheimer)))
(((dajooos parentheses)))
Meanwhile some kids don't have leukemia.
▶ No.885588>>885595
>goyim are willing to be electromagnetically gassed so their goyPhone can transmit their every word and movement for advertising/espionage purposes and to download propaganda in glorious 4K UHD
normalfags are niggercattle, plain and simple.
▶ No.885592
>>885496
The biggest danger to 5G is the IoT spying that it makes possible.
▶ No.885595>>885605 >>885614 >>885619
>>885588
There is no proof that microwaves cause harm. If you want to be taken seriously, provide some evidence or gtfo with your /pol/ meme words you illiterate brainlet.
http://www.who.int/peh-emf/meetings/archive/en/keynote3ng.pdf
▶ No.885605>>885607 >>885613 >>885637
>>885595
no (((university))) research that's been (((peer))) reviewed by the (((academic))) journals.
it's interesting that you chose to link to the (((World Health Organization)))
pure coincidence
▶ No.885608
>>885365
>what is beam-forming technology
▶ No.885609>>885922 >>885935
>>885607
Try again retard.
▶ No.885610>>885616
would it be possible to set a microwave's resonant frequency to match a stone instead of water so you could melt rocks?
▶ No.885612>>885616
and has anyone ever tried?
▶ No.885613>>885625
>>885605
What about the pic, you ignored half of the evidence I posted?
>i don't trust no science or academic journals
>science is for le (((joos)))
>i won't provide counter arguments, though
you cheeky shitposter, I'm not replying until you provide arguments which support your hypothesis.
▶ No.885616>>885617 >>885619
>>885610
>>885612
>>>/4chan/
go back now
>>885614
it has reference and sources, you faggot. it's also used in wikipedia. but you are too stubborn to consider an alternative source. it's basically an 'ad hominem' argument.
https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
fuck off with your shill tactics
▶ No.885617>>885618
>>885616
take your schizophrenia meds faggot
▶ No.885618
▶ No.885619>>885624
>>885595
>>885616
>There is no proof that microwaves cause harm
total brainlet detected. you probably fried your brains with microwaves. think about what happens to your food when you put it in a microwave? it becomes hot, right? that same thing happens to your cells, if you use cellular data, only to less extent.
▶ No.885624>>885636
>>885619
>muh cells become hot
Your cells become hot from body heat as well, you absolute mongoloid. Heat is not harmful. Did you even read the study I linked? Your argument is false.
▶ No.885625>>885627
>>885613
>academic journals suppress all studies that don't fit their narrative
<how about you provide some evidence you ameri-mutt! protip:you can't! i'll bet you believe global warming, oops sorry i meant climate change, despite 99% of peer reviewed scientists in complete agreement from our approved science journals saying it's happening, also there's infinite genders and race is a social construct, just check our journals! see! no evidence against it is there! science!
academics doomed themselves
▶ No.885627
>>885625
I agree that some academic studies are warped in order to fulfill a political agenda, but most of them are in the humanitarian fields. Anyone with enough knowledge can check how much radiation their phone emits and compare it to the official data. I have done it myself and the data matches. It's harder to fake a STEM field related study. What is your alternative? To trust some faggots on a japanese anime image board? Or an anonymous blogger? I prefer dealing with actual science studies.
>still no counter argument
at least try, schlomo
▶ No.885635
>>885367
Microwave is non-ionizing. At extremely high levels, it can cause things to heat up but is not ionizing.
▶ No.885636>>885639 >>885646
>>885624
>Heat is not harmful.
Dude stick your hand in front of this acetylene-oxygen torch. It's just heat man. Non-ionizing.
▶ No.885637
>>885605
Fear of everything is a sign of deeper issues. Get some help.
▶ No.885639>>885640
>>885636
>hot enough to melt steel
>1/1000 of a degree
<same thing
You need to get some help. Seriously.
▶ No.885640>>885646 >>885704
>>885639
How is that even an argument. You said heat does no damage, then you say it does. Make up your mind.
▶ No.885646>>885655 >>885656
>>885636
>dude try breathing underwater
>see? water is harmful
>>885640
Yes, heat can cause damage to your cells if it's over a certain temperature. That works in the microwave because it operates in 1000W and it's all concentrated on what's inside it.
>A mobile phone transmits RF radiation in all directions and a proportion of it is directed to the body.It does not operate with a fixed output power level when a call is made. The maximum output powers of GSM phones operating at 900 MHz and 1800MHz are 2W and 1W respectively but can be reduced by a factor of 1000 during calls.
Your phone or router don't have enough power to heat your cells. The Sun/weather has a higher impact on your cells than RF or MW radiation.
▶ No.885655>>885662 >>885666 >>885689 >>885719 >>885732
>>885646
What's the point of these then?
▶ No.885662>>885685
>>885655
Burn hazard maybe
▶ No.885666>>885669 >>885730
>>885655
The towers operate in higher power. You cannot compare a whisper to a airplane jet engine sound. That's what I'm trying to say - mobile phones cannot achieve this kind of power.
▶ No.885669>>885673
>>885666
yet distance has no effect in your world.
▶ No.885673
>>885669
It does. That's why those towers are not situated near crowded areas. Same as nuclear plants.
▶ No.885685
▶ No.885689>>885691
>>885655
Do you understand the difference between a TV remote and a 10kW infrared deathray? It's the same difference as between a cell phone and a cell phone tower - one is harmless, the other will murder the shit out of you if you stick your head inside the invisible beam.
I wonder if you could get people to panic over IR radiation as well. Surely some retards could be convinced that their TV remotes are giving them cancer.
▶ No.885691
>>885689
>10kW infrared deathray
Making weapon was never this safe.
▶ No.885700
>my 5 watt wifi router is melting my brain! i can not trust that government health studies because muh jews
i hope you all get cancer from the sun
▶ No.885704
>>885640
1. Not the guy you were replying to
2. Look up the transmitt energy of a wifi transceiver and work out the power at your distance. It's nowhere near being in the same order of magnitude. You will get way more cell damage from taking a warm shower.
3. Stop spamming /tech/ with your "not an argument" non-arguments
▶ No.885719>>885731 >>885736 >>885807
>opens any pre-2010 cellphone manual (when they actually did put some instructions inside)
>please do not keep the device closer than 2 inches/5cm to body
>Japan has a ban on using mobile phones near priority seats in trains
>dude, it's just radio, non-ionizing stuff
>dumb american did you skip your physics classes blah-blah
>shoot yourself with smaller caliber bullets to build immunity for bigger ones
Just fucking explain how microwave crowd control weapons exist. The antenna preheats under-skin layers causing people to feel pain, shock or light burning making them to run away from source. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System
>>885655
>inb4 soon omnipresent 5G indeed will turn out to be like mind-control towers in Prisoners of Power
You throw a frog into a boiling pot, it jumps right away. You slowly heat the water, frog boils with it.
▶ No.885730>>885736
>>885666
> tower->cell phone: WARNING DANGEROUS RADIATION HAZARD
> cell phone -> tower: perfectly fine goyim don't worry about it keep using facebook
▶ No.885731
>>885719
Dunning-Kruger: the post
▶ No.885732
>>885655
according to the scientists ITT those are safe to ignore. Let’s see a video of you rubbing your balls against a cell tower antenna.
▶ No.885736>>885765 >>885771
>>885730
>what is power
if I shoot a straw at your body with enough power, it'll probably pass through it. does it make straws lethal weapons?
>>885719
>>please do not keep the device closer than 2 inches/5cm to body
[citation needed]
Also, cell phones were emitting more radiation back then.
>>shoot yourself with smaller caliber bullets to build immunity for bigger ones
more like: it all depends on how fast the object hits you (power).
>Just fucking explain how microwave crowd control weapons exist.
"The ADS works by firing a high-powered beam of 95 GHz waves at a target"
I emphasize on HIGH-POWERED.
▶ No.885754>>885760
>>885383
>>885366
>>885395
>totally not dangerous goyim make sure you set up an LTE repeater on your nightstand to ensure you have high quality signal coverage to load your reddit threads on time every time :^)
Fucking kill yourself.
▶ No.885760>>885768 >>885770
>>885754
This radio tower != 5 watt wifi router
Kill yourself faggot
▶ No.885765>>886165 >>886174
>>885736
300MW cell tower is not high-powered enough for you?
What if it could concentrate it's beams in certain directions? In fact what exactly stops them from doing so?
If everything around you is "5 Watt wireless IoT thermostat", then given enough quantity, it will turn into 500 Watt microwave oven.
Now I'm curious, has anyone tried to boil water with few hundreds of WiFi routers yet?
▶ No.885768>>885796
>>885760
your pilpul only makes my oven hotter, chaim. All people want is for normalniggers to pump the brakes on the EM pollution but i get it, there's shekels in 6 month goyphone product cycles, network infrastructure and chemo drugs.
▶ No.885770>>885806
>>885760
yeah because the cell tower in your backyard and the wall of rf from at least a dozen chink rebrand routers in your vicinity at all times totally just equal 5w.
▶ No.885771
>>885736
>cell phones were emitting more radiation back then
Compare this:
>1 2-watt cellphone per 1000 people in 2000
>today every hobo has a high-bandwidth radio device that can't live 8 hours without electric socket, every building has 30 hot-spots, 2 femtocells, 2 wireless bridges and one carrier tower in dense areas
▶ No.885774
>>885366
>this nigger hasn't even completed his Technician ham license
Yes grandma RF can be dangerous or fatal.
▶ No.885796>>885824
>>885768
Can you talk like a normal person? Or is your brain permanently mutilated by /pol/nigger bullshit?
▶ No.885806
>>885770
Do you know anything about radios or how radio signals work?
▶ No.885807
>>885719
<Reflective materials such as aluminum cooking foil should reflect this radiation and could be used to make clothing that would be protective against this radiation.
tnfoilers: 1
normies: 0
▶ No.885815>>885841
Wifi routers have sub watt TX power. It's even weaker than the shitty chink Baofeng handhelds you can get on Amazon for $25. The frequency doesn't matter since its non ionizing. It's the power you throw into it and the loss of signal which creates heat. There wont be any radiating from a Wifi router antenna.
▶ No.885824
>>885796
let us know when you have washed the sand out of your vagina
▶ No.885841>>885860
>>885815
>The frequency doesn't matter since its non ionizing.
That's just false or microwave ovens wouldn't work.
▶ No.885860>>885938 >>885963 >>888010
>>885841
My microwave is 1.65KW. Where do you think that power is going?
▶ No.885916>>885956
>>885455
RF is below 300 MHz, between that and 300 GHz it's microwaves.
>short bus
no u
▶ No.885935>>885962
>>885922
>>885609
Both of these are D&C
▶ No.885938
▶ No.885956
▶ No.885962
>>885935
I must say though, the Amerimutt meme is pretty damn fantastic.
▶ No.885963
▶ No.886165
>>885765
>What if it could concentrate it's beams in certain directions? In fact what exactly stops them from doing so?
I have not enough knowledge in the field to say for sure what would happen if you point a beam from such a tower in a certain direction and whether it is possible at all. It would probably fry you. It's a valid concern because there is not enough research on the subject, I admit.
>If everything around you is "5 Watt wireless IoT thermostat", then given enough quantity, it will turn into 500 Watt microwave oven.
According to this:
http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs304/en/
http://www.mpoweruk.com/radio.htm
That's not quite the case. I've searched for any evidence on whether different radio waves' power accumulates, but I couldn't find any. You should be more concerned with solar radiation, tbqh.
▶ No.886174
>>885765
>In free space, all electromagnetic waves (radio, light, X-rays, etc.) obey the inverse-square law which states that the power density ρ, of an electromagnetic wave is proportional to the inverse of the square of the distance r, from a point source[3] or: ρ ∝ 1/r^2
▶ No.886177
>>885361 (OP)
>watching Youtube
>ever
confirmed mouthbreather
▶ No.886194>>886200
so happy with my thread. see how easy it is guys? to have an affect in the world you just have to have an idea, a concern and show it to your audience. in this case, I particularly chose a group of individuals not typically prone to saftery concerns
▶ No.886196
>>885383
(((who))) could be behind this post?
or good goy lefty looney tune cuck?
▶ No.886200
>>886194
agree. asking and provoking is what leads to progress. do you still have concerns about non-ionizing radiation, though?
▶ No.887995
▶ No.888010