[–]▶ No.880885>>880960 >>881259 >>881338 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
Is there an ultra low latency news feed available out there that doesn't cost a leg? (preferably free)
>inb4 rss
waaaay too slow.
Is it possible to hack into a Bloomberg or Reuters terminal news feed?
▶ No.880887>>880894 >>880910 >>880932 >>881011
Nope. You've gotta pay to play goy. Free news is for the riffraff. And if you can't afford a bloomberg terminal, you don't need it anyways.
▶ No.880894>>880919
>>880887
I do need it and i may get it at some point but i have to start somewhere.
I can't afford $2.5k a month for now.
▶ No.880897>>880903
>Is it possible to hack into a Bloomberg or Reuters terminal news feed?
Of course. I doubt they're unhackable, nothing is. Not that it matters since you can't or you wouldn't ask.
▶ No.880903
▶ No.880910
>>880887
>And if you can't afford a bloomberg terminal, you don't need it anyways.
This is true though.
▶ No.880919>>880953
>>880894
>i have to start somewhere.
Work for a company that has one.
▶ No.880923
I'm such a hacker I hacked my college system and they give their students that ask enough access to Bloomberg new terminal
▶ No.880927>>880953
▶ No.880932
>>880887
>And if you can't afford a bloomberg terminal, you don't need it anyways.
Exactly
▶ No.880953>>880958
>>880919
I don't know any
>>880927
For news
▶ No.880958
>>880953
What news? There's almost infinite amount of news every second.
▶ No.880959>>880963
you might as well scrape twitter, reddit, 8ch, and 4ch and make a feed from that. MSM is behind the curve in the modern era when it comes to news, they are the last to know.
▶ No.880960
>>880885 (OP)
>>880933
you are cancer
▶ No.880963>>880992 >>881007
>>880959
But how do i know if its reliable or not?
▶ No.880992>>881007 >>881027
>>880963
Did you think the normal media outlets gave you reliable news?
▶ No.881007>>881027
▶ No.881011
▶ No.881024>>881027 >>881034
Bloomberg doesn't have reliable information, I have caught them many times quarterbacking for their corporate partners.
4-cuck /pol/ is better for breaking news.
▶ No.881027>>881028
▶ No.881028
>>881027
>Too slow.
It's the fastest, faster than Cuckberg or the wire services, faster even than intelligence services.
You simply won't get any faster.
▶ No.881029>>881035
i was thinking about a twitter crawler that would spot a breakin news by filtering, analyzing and ranking tweets by likelihood
The number of tweet posted from the area where the event happened*how many verified accounts tweeted a similar story = level of accuracy.
I don't know where to start.
▶ No.881034>>881074
>>881024
>I have caught them many times
Can you provide even a modicum of evidence?
▶ No.881035>>881179
>>881029
you might want to start with coming up with $5000/month to be able to use their (((premium))) api's which is what you would need to scrape that much data without having to bounce user accounts from them getting banned for heavy use.
https://developer.twitter.com/en/pricing/search-fullarchive
▶ No.881074>>881179 >>881475
>>881034
The most recent was the McDonalds sign flip fake news, stocks bumped almost 2% when it broke.
But Bloomberg does this all the time. It's part of my trading strategy to take advantage of these little lies of theirs.
▶ No.881179
>>881035
Wtf ? didn't it use to be free?!
>>881074
Pics of your terminal or you're full of shit
▶ No.881259>>881277
>>880885 (OP)
Rent a bunch of dedicated servers with high bandwidth/low latency peering in desired parts of world, scrape local news sites, forums and so. Run machine learning to sort and condense information, feed it over low-bandwidth protocols like XMPP or Atom to your terminal to maximize the throughput per server.
I suppose, this is what (((Broomborg))) terminal acrually does, it connects to (((Boombang))) servers and pulls text from there. Jews wouldn't call it "terminal" otherwise. This is as far as I understand the topic, but isn't there anyone who bought it and made some sort of functions and interfaces overview for interested people?
▶ No.881277
▶ No.881338
>>880885 (OP)
>paying for or wanting real time clickbait and propaganda
lmao
▶ No.881475>>881525 >>881723
>>881074
Wow anon you have super powers that lets you know when a news that just broke is fake or not?
▶ No.881525>>881532
>>881475
>>881475
>only pics available are all identical and obviously shopped
>address of location not given
>easy free virtue signaling points
Bloomberg publishes fake news every single day.
▶ No.881532>>881535
>>881525
I still don't see how that story affected the market.
▶ No.881535
>>881532
Day bump of a couple percent, and if you know the fake news is going to be planted and trumpeted across all outlets, you can take advantage of it.
It's called securities fraud and fake news. Happens all the time.
▶ No.881723>>881872
>>881475
Definition of fake news :
>everything I disagree with
>everything that doesn't fit my worldview
Everybody uses those criteria, makes it really easy to spot fake news
▶ No.881872
>>881723
In this case it's actually fake news, there is no proof that this happened at all aside from one obvious photoshopped picture featuring just the sky and a badly edited sign.
▶ No.882593>>882694 >>882920
▶ No.882694>>882913
>>882593
Time to start buying AMD stock
▶ No.882913
>>882694
Yesterday was an all points bulletin to do just that, for anybody with a brain.
▶ No.882920>>882938
>>882593
Unfortunately, that isn't fake news. That is 100% real news - short selling AMD is on the rise. They are just reporting the facts.
▶ No.882938>>882940
>>882920
It's actually fake news, AMD is down a bit today but when the article was published yesterday, it was up. It also cites the nothing-burger IDF larper's report.
Totally fake news from real Jews, as usual.
▶ No.882940>>882960
>>882938
Actually AMD closed up today as well.
The short sellers failed.
▶ No.882960>>883051
>>882940
I don't think you understand how trading works, the majority of traders are not day traders, and finishing a particular day in the red on a certain stock is not "failure".
▶ No.883051
>>882960
>the majority of traders are not day traders
are you talking about retail? Because i know most institutional are.