/tech/ - Technology★

Yeah, I bet this never gets mentioned again when it doesn't fit in with their bigotry.

I've been thinking about writing a forced anonymous user script for github, bitbucket, gitlab, etc. It would simply delete all user avatars from the pages and replace their account names as well as git credentials with their corresponding hashes for obfuscation purposes.

The idea is to make discrimination claims impossible because the developer literally cannot see anything but the code being submitted.

>>880110

Better yet, don't use github you stupid fuck. Who would have thought that merging a social media platform source code repository would have unintended consequences.

Oh thats right these retarded transniggers need a graphical client to submit their patches.

>>880110

Good idea, actually. But transniggers will let you know who they are and what their pronouns are anyway.

>>880073 (OP)

>anonimize code contributions

Sounds a little convoluted. Especially since developers wouldn't get their little internet points by having their name in the git log.

Also, what is to stop CIA-kun and NSA-kun from making underhanded patches. Making them anonymous makes the review process harder.

>Women account for 22 percent of computer programmers working in the U.S, but only 11 percent of them contribute to open source projects.

This is similar to how when a roofer gets home he doesn't start working on his own roof. Males are too autistic to see that this is just more work.

>More PRs from women

Yeah, if you count PRs unrelated to code like fixing typos.

>keep computer programming a boy’s club

Please. Keep those drama inducing 3DPD roasties out.

>>880110

>>880123

You didn't read the article, did you?

>Marti recruited Tomislav Jovanovic, a ten-year veteran of Mozilla’s open source projects, to create a blinding mechanism for code repositories like GitHub. That way, reviewers can’t see the gender, location, user name, icon, or avatar associated with a particular code submission.

>>880110

Why not instead write a neural network to detect aposematic hair, soyface, or dark skintones? Then you can just decline the commit immediately.

>>880160

Both those replies relate to the article.

>female coders were .8% less likely to have their code accepted

>.8%

fucking hell

>>880176

They do more than that - they suggest doing an exact thing the article says has already been done, which means they're probably based on the OP and not on the content of the article.

>>880115

>need a graphical client to submit their patches

that's easily possible without github you dinghole

>>880123

>But transniggers will let you know who they are and what their pronouns are anyway.

So they also need rules which prohibit from typing irrelevant shit into commit messages, etc.

If someone sends a pull requests with words "hey look at me I am transnigger" or "hey look at me I am a white male", they should be discarded immediately as improperly formatted.

> nearly 3% more often. However, if their gender was known, female coders were .8% less likely to have their code accepted.

this is what they are tripping on

>0.08% less likely to have their code accepted

<99.92% just as likely to have their code accepted

>unacceptable

they all need to be gassed

>>880221

>works at mozilla

>surprised when they shill for rust

this is your brain on /pol/

>>880221

>you may also like donald trump

that says it all about the screenshot maker.

I wonder if this "minority" madness will ever stop.

>yes I know I murdered and raped multiple children but don't you see? Child murder rapists are a minority!

>we realised that our company wasn't diverse enough as we lacked uneducated overseas criminals

>>880264

why stop at that? they ought to do no less than to resurrect Hitler to employ him, because he is underrepresented in their otherwise diverse team.