▶ No.862860
I'd fork her repo anytime
▶ No.862862
>>862859 (OP)
Did computers back then have the capability to store that much code?
▶ No.862865>>862911 >>862944
>>862859 (OP)
What kikery is this, OP?
▶ No.862869
▶ No.862874>>862876 >>862919
>>862873
You're telling me you wouldn't beat up Moaning Myrtle's pussy?
▶ No.862876>>862919
>>862874
Considering I used to tug my prick to her scenes in Harry Potter, definitely.
▶ No.862879>>862880
>>862859 (OP)
>written by hand
>at least 5 of paper
what was their style guide, one character per sheet?
▶ No.862880>>862905
>>862879
It simply was the Kode with Klossy of the '50s.
▶ No.862893>>862905
>>862859 (OP)
The first dozen of piles are just the CoC
▶ No.862905>>862909
>>862880
> Implying you will achieve even 0.1% of what Margaret Hamilton has accomplished in her lifetime.
>>862893
That was actually funny.
▶ No.862909>>862937 >>862942 >>863285
>>862905
Of course I won't, my surname isn't (((Hamilton)))
▶ No.862911
▶ No.862919
>>862873
>>862874
>>862876
TELL ME ABOUT MOANING MYRTLE! WHY DOES SHE MAKE THE MOAN???
▶ No.862930>>863369 >>863401 >>863447
>>862859 (OP)
>When girls code Fizz Buzz
▶ No.862937>>863285
>>862909
Is any surname Jewish now, if you believe hard enough?
▶ No.862939
Maybe she did it the BASIG style with 9 empty lines between each instruction.
▶ No.862942>>863098 >>863285
>>862909
> The surname Hamilton most probably originated in the village of Hamilton, Leicestershire, England, but bearers of that name became established in the 13th century in Lanarkshire, Scotland.
> Jewish
Hamilton sounds like a name from some clerk straight off the Mayflower... but...
JEWISH!
You guys need to take a break from the internets.
▶ No.862944>>862948 >>863307
>>862865
and if you look at older captions of that photo they mention that she was part of a TEAM.
>Engineer stands next to computer output of software made by her and her team for part of Apollo project
>Woman stands next to printouts of her program for Apollo project
>Woman stands next to program she alone wrote by hand.
next
>Woman alone responsible for all of space program
Anyways here is the source code.
https://github.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11/
I wonder why it is being translated to Korean?
▶ No.862948
>>862944
Might be for people studying CS in Korea.
▶ No.862994
>>862859 (OP)
She's kinda cute.
▶ No.863026>>863042
>>862981
Why do the kikes hate chickens so much?
▶ No.863033
They should have used an Agile methodology, put the astronauts in space and then worry about bugs.
▶ No.863042
>>863026
The goat is too pricy.
▶ No.863098>>863114
>>862942
give him a break, /pol/ made him the retard he is
▶ No.863100>>863115 >>863117
>>862859 (OP)
I'm always weary of these "exemplar" women programmers. You tend to dig a little deeper and find their contributions were fractional compared to what is claimed. Grace Hooper *the* "inventor of COBOL" is an example. And then there's cases, like the significance of Ada Lovelace, which are pretty much bullshit
▶ No.863114
▶ No.863115>>863149
>>863100
Lovelace was legit. Just because the politics of our current era have put women in a bad light, it doesn't denigrate the contributions other have made in the past. Sorry, but I refuse to allow insidious jews to promote the idea that we should disregard 50% of our race.
▶ No.863117
▶ No.863119
>863098
Golly gee, a leftist brainletwojakposter. I wonder what site he could be from, and I wonder if it rhymes with "whore flan"
▶ No.863149>>863153 >>863158 >>863171
>>863115
>Lovelace was legit.
Nope. They pretend Ada was the first programmer, which assumes she beat Babbage in making the first program to the computer he himself invented (i.e. he'd have to come up with the whole thing without testing if it was a good idea at any point). She might have done something small, maybe, but nothing I recall.
Ada is hyped as fuck and so is Hooper (who they say invented the compiler, she didn't, a German did it in the early 40s), although Hooper at least did something. If you want a woman with actual contributions that's Marie Curie.
▶ No.863153>>863157
>>863149
If you consider punching in numbers into a calculator to be programming, I will find you and punch you in the face.
▶ No.863157
>>863153
The analytical engine could be programmed, it wasn't just a fancy calculator. He didn't build it though.
▶ No.863158>>863187 >>863455
>>863149
She's credited with writing the first algorithm.
> whole thing without testing
He never completed the Analytical Engine. Perhaps you're talking about the Difference Engine, which isn't considered a general purpose computer.
▶ No.863163
>>862859 (OP)
>Hamilton in 1969, standing next to the navigation software that she and her MIT team produced for the Apollo project
▶ No.863171>>863296 >>863455
>>863149
Good goy, always diminish the accomplishments of a white woman. Make sure you resent women, and remain divided amongst yourselves.
>>863048
Yep.
▶ No.863187>>863189 >>863194
>>863158
>She's credited with writing the first algorithm.
except when you reduce programming to "writing the algorithm" then we can also describe fucking archimedes or pythagoras as the first programmer.
▶ No.863189
>>863187
Writing algorithms does not imply programming. Programming is the act of writing a program, which composes of various algorithms, that a computer is intended to execute.
▶ No.863194>>863455
>>863187
No shit. This is specifically an algorithm for a computer to execute. Why do you so desperately want Ada Lovelace to be a fraud?
▶ No.863267>>863287
>>862981
I see you've just left your hole for the first time so I won't be too hard on you and point out that I was just shaming OP, not earnestly asking for information. Please be less autistic in the future.
▶ No.863285
>>862909
>>862937
>>862942
I know jews with Hamilton as a last name
sage for unrelated to handwritten code
▶ No.863287>>863300
>>863267
Let me clue you in to how message boards work. While the reply might be to an individual post, the message is intended for the audience at large. Now that we've cleared that up, hopefully you can dispense with your worthless advice without requiring further instruction.
▶ No.863296>>863301 >>863343
>>862981
>>863171
I agree that there's D&C among us, but you're trying too hard to defend someone just because it's a woman. If it's a fact that someone's contribution, be a man s or a woman's, is small to the whole project like someone translating the README to Klingon, you don't inflate the merits to fight D&C. This is lying to suit your agenda, pretty much what OP's pic shows. It's an example of 1984 style history rewrite.
▶ No.863300>>863301
>>863287
Then next time don't address me and make the post more general
▶ No.863301
>>863296
> just because it's a woman
Wrong. Ada is being credited for exactly what she did, there's no inflating. No one is claiming she built the difference engine, or the analytical engine, or even compares to Alan Turing. Her notebooks are available for viewing if you wish to learn more.
The only problem with Ada is that she's being turned into a feminist symbol by crazy bluehairs, whom the Countess of Lovelace would have likely viewed with utter contempt.
>>863300
You're a bit of an idiot, aren't you?
▶ No.863309
>>862859 (OP)
imagine the taste of her asshole
▶ No.863311>>863317
this was from time when ppl werent ok with garbage code and memory leaks,
debugging that was probably easier,
these days ppl have decided to cause problems for themselves intentionally
▶ No.863317>>863321
>>863311
every stackoverflow post that starts with "Am I too intelligent for the other developers in my company" usually in relationship with functional Javascript
▶ No.863321>>863324 >>863331
>>863317
Anybody who is able to structure a program into purely functions and impure functions is inherently more intelligent than everyone else who is happy to mix everything into impure functions.
▶ No.863324>>863327
>>863321
>muh functional hurfdurf
▶ No.863326
>take humanity to the moon
You just have to drive, it's in Kubrick's studio.
▶ No.863327>>863329 >>863330
>>863324
>too brainlet for functional purity
▶ No.863329>>863333
>>863327
>fp has achieved nothing
>meanwhile c got us to the moon
▶ No.863330>>863332 >>863333
>>863327
> "the chief geek" engineer in every company
> makes life more complicated for everyone
▶ No.863331>>863333
>>863321
implying anyone cares about your shit webdeb shit that will end up on a shit web social 8.0 botnet shit.
You're not working on high-precision flight instrumentation unlike Margaret Hamilton, you're at best working for a shit company like Google or Facebook that has literally 0 social benefit and probably the most crucial problem you've ever encountered so far was optimizing writing speeds when storing private users data in JSON before sending them to third-party advertiser API's.
▶ No.863332
>>863330
You still use instances of functional programming even in the imperative paradigm, faggot.
▶ No.863333>>863337 >>863379
>>863329
>functional programming is pure mathematics.
>mathematics has achieved nothing in human history
>>863330
Who are you quoting?
>>863331
Cool story bro
▶ No.863337
>>863333
>functional programming has never mattered
>i know! just claim fp = math! im such a genius!
▶ No.863343
>>863296
>exaggerating aspects of a disputed historical figure is on par with inventing an ongoing war out of thin air
fugging ebig
▶ No.863360
>>862859 (OP)
Isn't (((Hollywood))) telling us she's a negro?
▶ No.863369
>>862930
This one is good...kek
▶ No.863379>>863390 >>863424 >>863442
>>863333
> >functional programming is pure mathematics.
This fucking meme needs to die. It's not pure mathematics.
▶ No.863380>>863382
>>862859 (OP)
This got to be all the revisions with long comments. Each book that size is easily 5 megs of text. What was Apollo's computer ROM size?
▶ No.863382
>>863380
That would be 64 kilobytes.
▶ No.863390
>>863379
It is pure mathematics. All computer programming is pure mathematics, it just tends to use weirdly arbitrary models.
▶ No.863401>>863410 >>863412
>>862930
what the fuck was that?
▶ No.863410
>>863401
Some hue who whipped out his dick during a feminist slut walk.
▶ No.863412
▶ No.863433
>>862859 (OP)
>implying man went to the moon
>implying that this are not just empty sheets
>implying the Apollo missions produced a functioning computing system
>implying it's not just blatant propaganda
Holy shit I just want /g/ to leave for fucks sake. Kill yourselves you filthy summerfags.
▶ No.863440
>>863307
meme aside, IRL even the USA use floppy disks for top military safety so rocketman is right
▶ No.863442>>863539
>>863379
CS here. i am actually studying computation theory right now. cs is a lot about practtical application of math
▶ No.863447
>>862930
I have always seen this guy on the banner and I wondered who he was.
Kek for just finding out.
▶ No.863455>>864324
>>863158
>She's credited with writing the first algorithm.
Yes, for Babbage's machine, which makes no sense for the reason you conveniently ignored. The only scenario where it's possible Ada was first is if Babbage 1) never tried to write a single algorithm before inventing the analytical engine, which would mean he was stupid and 2) built a time machine and went 6 years back in time to steal her code since Babbage published in 1836 and Ada only in 1842.
>>863171
I'm not diminishing her accomplishments, you're the one making her accomplishments seem greater than they really were. She was easy to bed, she could translate scientific texts, and she wasn't stupid, but the first programmer she was not.
>>863194
Ada wasn't a fraud, she never lied about it. The lies about her are recent.
▶ No.863539
>>863442
Theoretical CS is a true discipline of math. Applied CS is extremely broad because there are so many applications of the study of computation to all kinds of subjects.
▶ No.864324
>>863455
>pic
Looks like machines I saw for sale in Africa.not