[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 2hu / animu / asmr / cafechan / rule34 / tk / u / zoo ][Options][ watchlist ]

/tech/ - Technology

You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

File (hide): 9b72d66519645af⋯.gif (1.69 MB, 1600x900, 16:9, 150910-twitter-bots.gif) (h) (u)

[–]

 No.859857>>859859 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

>Several Devumi customers acknowledged that they bought bots because their careers had come to depend, in part, on the appearance of social media influence. “No one will take you seriously if you don’t have a noteworthy presence,” said Jason Schenker, an economist who specializes in economic forecasting and has purchased at least 260,000 followers.

>Not surprisingly, Devumi has sold millions of followers and retweets to entertainers on the lower and middle rungs of Hollywood, such as the actor Ryan Hurst, a star of the television series “Sons of Anarchy.” In 2016 and 2017, he bought a total of 750,000 followers, about three-quarters of his current count. It cost less than $4,000, according to company records. Mr. Hurst did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

>Influencers need not be well known to rake in endorsement money. According to a recent profile in the British tabloid The Sun, two young siblings, Arabella and Jaadin Daho, earn a combined $100,000 a year as influencers, working with brands such as Amazon, Disney, Louis Vuitton and Nintendo. Arabella, who is 14, tweets under the name Amazing Arabella.

>But her Twitter account --- and her brother’s — are boosted by thousands of retweets purchased by their mother and manager, Shadia Daho, according to Devumi records. Ms. Daho did not respond to repeated attempts to reach her by email and through a public relations firm.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/01/27/technology/social-media-bots.html

Realistically how many accounts on Twitter are fake?

I'm thinking 70%+.

 No.859859>>859860 >>860955

>>859857 (OP)

>I'm thinking 70%+

Easily 90% of left-leaning Twitter accounts are bots


 No.859860>>860048

>>859859

It's an across the board issue, on Twitter you'll see apolitical accounts with 2 million followers on average getting 2 retweets and 10 likes on their tweets.

The whole thing is a confidence scam, people think it's more popular than it is so they feel they have to use Twitter to be relevant which sets off a never ending spiral that Twitter can cash in on.


 No.859864

File (hide): 8412eba409ab670⋯.jpg (42.17 KB, 572x626, 286:313, aa.JPG) (h) (u)

529k followers.

Her best content gets 14 retweets and 39 likes.

and NY Times confirms her retweets and likes are coming from Devumi.

So basically no one on Twitter is interacting with this person but by Twitter's metrics she's hugely popular and is making a lot of money out of that fake popularity.

Makes you think.


 No.859962>>859971

Why are they giving them so much money if almost all of their followers are bots?


 No.859971>>859972 >>859977

>>859962

because these companies are run by people and people take things at face value, it doesn't occur to them that things might not be as they seem.

This Arabella Daho likely only has about 30 real followers but the people at Amazon, Nintendo and Disney giving her money don't know that.


 No.859972

>>859971

>Amazon, Nintendo and Disney giving her money don't know that.

They do. Consumers don't and journalists conveniently ignore that fact since they use the same bots to appear relevant.


 No.859977>>859983

>>859971

I fucking want to burn down all of social media for this shit. Some teen kids are getting paid for doing literally nothing while other people slave away their health for a pittance.


 No.859983>>859990 >>862177

>>859977

You could literally be doing it right now


 No.859990

>>859983

Born a sucker.


 No.860016>>860027

GNU Social is nice. I don't have a twatter


 No.860027>>860042 >>860065

>>860016

GNUsocialites are like vegetarians or "bitcoin investers"

They can't stop talking about it


 No.860042>>860065

>>860027

I've been on it for months and haven't mentioned it up until this moment


 No.860048

>>859860

No anon. Think for a second.

Why would you spend money on followers if you could get banned for wrong think at any second? Yeah you wouldn't.

Bots only appear on twitterally correct accounts and shill accounts.


 No.860065

>>860027

Enjoy your walled-garden of shillbots, retard.

>>860042

same. above faggot comparing us to vegetarians prompted a comment. I, for one, hope he dies of AIDS.


 No.860945

So what's stopping me from starting my own twitter where I do 30 second reviews of random crap like clothes and gadgets, and dropping a few grand for 1 mil followers? Won't I make that back and then some from sponsorships and affiliate deals?


 No.860955>>860956

>>859859

I'm pretty sure the ones that auto respond to Trump are bots. Perhaps the later replies are by real people, but you see some that reply within seconds of his tweet.


 No.860956

>>860955

and I mean the same accounts over and over again, replying very quickly.


 No.861041>>861073 >>861197

File (hide): 1569c2309a9a6b7⋯.jpg (64.83 KB, 579x544, 579:544, ny mag.JPG) (h) (u)

>1 reply

>1 retweet

>2 likes

>1.72 million followers

This isn't me cherry picking, this is the standard for many big accounts. I've seen accounts with tens of followers that get far more engagement than accounts that supposedly have millions of followers. Something is really off about Twitter's numbers.


 No.861073

>>861041

Can't they get active bots?


 No.861171

>The publisher of Newsweek and the International Business Times has been engaging in fraudulent online traffic practices that helped it secure a major ad buy from a US government agency, according to a new report released today by independent ad fraud researchers.

>IBTimes.com, the publisher’s US business site, last year won a significant portion of a large video and display advertising campaign for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a federal agency. Social Puncher, a consulting firm that investigates online ad fraud, alleges in its report that the ads were displayed to an audience on IBTimes.com that includes a significant amount of “cheap junk traffic with a share of bots.”

>The CFPB’s ad budget was the subject of criticism from Republican lawmakers after the Daily Caller reported last year that it had awarded more than $40 million in contracts to a single ad agency, GMMB, which is one of the top Democratic media strategists.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/the-publisher-of-newsweek-and-the-international-business


 No.861197

>>861041

Last year some anons found that many of the biggest media outlets were using Chinese gold farmers to farm ad clicks.

Truth is, hate chan probably gets 5x the traffic as the NYT.


 No.861358

It's hard for normal people to join twitter also. 90% of the time they ask for your phone number and even normies are wary of that shit.

They don't ask for your number when signing up through the mobile page, funny enough.


 No.861364>>861381

Would there be a way to crash these fucking bots with no survivors? I doubt there'd be much you could do about it, but the bot traffic must be coming out of a server farm somewhere. It'd be interesting to see what Twitter actually looks like when they're removed; it might be a wakeup call for normalfags to realize how hollow and manufactured their social media experience is.


 No.861373

Found an interesting tidbit on a NYTimes article. It seems that more is going on with this Devumi company than just botting. Interestingly enough, it seems that this specific company has also made a lot of headlines recently; it seems that all the news articles are less than a week old. Scandal's fresh, I'd guess.


 No.861381>>861962

>>861364

Most of these server farms are Amazon AWS and today like 90% of everything is on there... if you try to block them then you blocked A LOT of stuff


 No.861962

>>861381

>SYSTEM pseudo-process sends encrypted data to some host with its reverse DNS being some generic cloud service domain name


 No.862161

File (hide): d6a550bf6069179⋯.jpg (107.24 KB, 1024x713, 1024:713, DVELvDzX0AATKcj.jpg) (h) (u)


 No.862177>>864267

>>859983

I am not a teenage girl.


 No.864267

>>862177

Why not




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
29 replies | 4 images | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 2hu / animu / asmr / cafechan / rule34 / tk / u / zoo ][ watchlist ]