/tech/ - Technology★

>>832964 (OP)

>Retards that don't know what bookmarks are are allowed to post on /tech/

wew

>>832988 (heil'd)

>unironically using Ubloated

>>832999

it's the best

A little over 1 GB, but most of that is a RAM disk. Lynx is using about 18 MB.

>>832999

id it's good enough for geohot...

>>833078

distro and DE?

>>833068

>geohot

>literally a madeup kiddo for media ewhoring

2.3 of 32GB

>>833209

Yeah, sure.

>>832964 (OP)

>over 200 tabs

OK, I need to know this you pig disgusting tab glutton. Why the fuck do you have this many tabs open?

Do you just keep tabs open instead of bookmarking them?

Are they google searches you forgot to clean?

How does a man actually make use of 200 fucking tabs?

>>833278

Just read faster

>>833278

I set up a userscript. I press ,q and the current tab has its URL and title added to a text file, after which it's closed.

Some day I'll start restoring things from the file. Until that day, my autism is soothed.

>>833278

You're fucking retarded. Focus on one thread at a time. You actually choose to retard yourself and this makes you a massive cuck.

>>833325

Nobody cares to write one that works like Windows. Are you willing to invest into this?

>>833247

one window for work, one for school, six windows for various research and study areas, and one for 8ch/shitposting. Most of it is longass articles I slowly read. I'd probably get through them a lot faster if I didn't shitpost as compulsively.

>>833325

Why is Windows 10 still catching up to where KDE was a decade ago?

>>833362

???

this -> >>833078

Looks really bad in comparison tbh

I never understood this. Do browsers not use virtual memory? It seems like the obvious choice would be to unload everything to the disk past a certain point. It's not like there's an excuse when 99 out of 100 tabs aren't even on the screen. Or is that what's happening? Do task manager stats include virtual memory, or are browsers just retarded?

>>833411

they already do, that's what the disk and memory caches are for. only they do the opposite of what your thinking. they not only keep all the tabs in memory, they keep another copy of all their content also in memory and disk cache. this should save on network bandwidth only it never does because the browser will always download all the content of the page every single time no matter what is in your cache. and then there's guide's and scripts that take that disk cache and stick that in ram too. so you have the page in memory in the tab, all it's content in the browsers ram cache, and all it's content in the browsers disk cache, which is also in ram.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Firefox/Profile_on_RAM

>>833411

Browsers don't use virtual memory swap space is different, I am talking about over-allocating except for the javascript garbage collector. If you turn off javascript and the UI isn't a peice of shit like mozilla's then its stable. Use palemoon or icecat you faggots.

>>833325

>using windows

Nice bloat faggot.

What process managers are out there that look good for linux/unix/gnu? Top, ptop, lxtask, and qps look like shit. Any others?

>>832975

the ephemeral nature of imagboards means you often miss out on cool breads and/or posts becasue the next time you load the thread it 404s or posts in the thread have been deleted.

>>833418

>bloat

Naw, Windows Prefetches frequently used data in RAM for performance reasons. RAM usage at idle will always be around 20 percent of total available memory. Without prefetch memory usage would probably be much lower

The reason GNU/Linux doesn't have such aggressive prefetch is probably because the prefetcher is patented by Microsoft

>>833430

it's probably because prefetch is bloat.

linux cache's disk read's in ram, it's postfetch.

why would I want the OS tracking everything I do trying and failing to anticipate my future IO needs and causing constant IO in the process. surely micropoo doesn't send any of these prefetch data in telemetry.

>>833432

The prefetcher is run at boot-time and retrieves data from its trace folder that passively creates data traces as applications are ran. And only a minute of program use is actually traced because the whole point is to start applications faster so the application itself can take over and load assets into memory

>>833419

systat (openbsd)

>>833421

You're supposed to focus on one thread at a time you attention deficit nigger.

>>833169

Trisquel 7 with Mate rolled from base install.

>>833169

>>833503

Actually this:

>>>/lv/1656

why would you need anything else besides 8?

running a fucking server farm?

unless you do dont waste money

>>833325

That requires actually competent and worthwhile developers, and that type do shit for money to pay bills and live instead of freetarding.

>>833418

>bloat meme

It's like you faggots have a fetish or something.

>>833432

>bloat meme

You can easily disable superfetch prefreching in Windows services. And linux swappiness is even worse performance because it's dependant on the disk not ram.

Good number of tabs open on firefox and some tmux stuff with documents for class open in vi.

load averages: 0.12, 0.41, 0.33 de 19:12:31

44 processes: 42 idle, 2 on processor up 2 days, 23:11

CPU0 states: 2.4% user, 0.0% nice, 1.0% system, 3.6% interrupt, 93.0% idle

CPU1 states: 25.7% user, 0.0% nice, 9.8% system, 0.0% interrupt, 64.5% idle

CPU2 states: 6.8% user, 0.0% nice, 1.2% system, 0.0% interrupt, 92.0% idle

CPU3 states: 27.3% user, 0.0% nice, 13.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 59.7% idle

Memory: Real: 1471M/2597M act/tot Free: 5257M Cache: 698M Swap: 0K/8353M

PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIME CPU COMMAND

47382 bt 34 0 970M 911M onproc/1 - 157:12 57.52% firefox

71452 bt 2 0 522M 437M sleep/0 poll 97:31 15.14% firefox

81363 _x11 2 0 35M 142M sleep/2 select 185:27 2.15% Xorg

81311 bt 2 0 339M 230M sleep/0 poll 0:52 0.05% firefox

76931 _sndio 2 -20 500K 1248K sleep/1 poll 10:24 0.00% sndiod

<have a whole web browser with more than 10 tabs; a few terminals, graphical music player, misc programs and mumble open; only running a window manager at worst

<only uses a little over 1gb of ram

<only doubles when i use krita

I am comfortable.

>>833915

that's clearly ruby you LARPing nigger

             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:       3111356    2280568     830788     227128     133804     869548
-/+ buffers/cache:    1277216    1834140
Swap:      5099516     109968    4989548

>>833325

>GNU

>software

I was expecting my RAM usage to be much higher, but I think that this is a side effect of me switching from chrome canary to pale moon. My RAM use is basically what it is when I have chrome turned off... Only 5.2/16 here.

>>833278

>>833421

>what is the archive

>>834613

Am I get memed on or did Drybones finally finish that? Last I saw was a long time ago when it was in beta and not really working.

>>833915

That picture isn't real, right?

>>837083

https://www.kodewithklossy.com/

It's very real. You've gotta be quick to see it though. I also find it hilarious that her site is composed entirely of Javascript.

>>837142

<meta name="generator" content="Wix.com Website Builder">

Klossy's 'Kode'