Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdfMax filesize is 16 MB.Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000. You may upload 3 per post.
File (hide): 7670aa79d0b3f8f⋯.png (3.32 KB, 182x72, 91:36, 43253.png) (h) (u)
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 18:53:30 No.822203[Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
What do you think of this?
/ourbrowser/?
https://beakerbrowser.com/docs/install/
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 19:11:44 No.822214
its shit. i can tell by the logo
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 19:23:25 No.822218>>822329 >>822332
GNU IceCat is /ourbrowser/
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 19:39:16 No.822221
IPFS can do all of this: Publishing and hosting your own static website or files, local JS stuff, Markdown websites (with Hugo). And you can do it all in your standard browser.
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 20:11:16 No.822238>>822242
It's a browser: It's shit.
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 20:14:37 No.822241
> node
> npm
GNO thanks.
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 20:16:21 No.822242>>822370
>>822238
What do you use? Elinks?
have fun with no graphics.
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 20:45:32 No.822265>>822272
tbh i just daily download sites with a small fetch script and read them locally
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 20:48:53 No.822272>>822289
>>822265
Did you write it yourself?
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 21:01:54 No.822289
>>822272
It uses HTTrack and the script just automates it for my chosen websites
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 21:38:13 No.822329>>822345
File (hide): 7b5543df5bbdb13⋯.png (21.72 KB, 588x389, 588:389, IceCat1.png) (h) (u)
>>822218
I am currently trying out Arch and there seems to be some issue with font rendering in IceCat (pics related). I tried changing the fonts and even tried the pre-built version to no avail. Waterfox and Pale Moon have no such issues.
Any solution?
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 21:39:32 No.822332
File (hide): 8acd5171300ced5⋯.png (106.4 KB, 1137x582, 379:194, IceCat2.png) (h) (u)
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 21:47:33 No.822345>>822362
>>822329
The browser is having trouble recognising or not using at all the anti-aliasing features. Not sure if its that, I had the same problem two years back with some browsers on Arch
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 22:09:45 No.822362>>822373 >>822375
>>822345
Anything I can do to solve the issue?
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 22:14:21 No.822370
>>822242
>have fun with no graphics.
have fun with usa-israel/russian/chinks botnets
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 22:18:15 No.822373
>>822362
Idk maybe see if theres any packages for browser text rendering but then again that might not be the fix but its a starting point
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 22:20:36 No.822375>>822394
Maybe try switching the values of the config entries with "azure" in the name.
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 22:45:04 No.822394
File (hide): 81691251ee141b8⋯.png (25.16 KB, 599x386, 599:386, IceCat3.png) (h) (u)
>>822375
Read this:
http://z-issue.com/wp/ugly-fonts-in-mozilla-firefox-and-thunderbird-under-linux-skia-and-cairo/
And it is fixed. Thank you.
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 22:45:10 No.822395>>822400 >>822730
The only good browsers are Chromium and Firefox. Anything else is a rebranded version of either, full of security issues, slower, less standards compliant, or any combination of those. You're mad because you know it's true.
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 23:06:33 No.822400>>822413
>>822395
Go bait in another board.
▶Anonymous 11/16/17 (Thu) 23:30:40 No.822413>>822453
>>822400
You're not going to prove me wrong, are you?
▶Anonymous 11/17/17 (Fri) 00:28:55 No.822453
>>822413
Prove that qtwebengine (from latest Qt) isn't as good.
▶Anonymous 11/17/17 (Fri) 08:32:07 No.822730>>822748
>Anything else is a rebranded version of either, full of security issues, slower, less standards compliant, or any combination of those.
How about TorBrowser? Is it less secure, slower (with blocked javascript)?
▶Anonymous 11/17/17 (Fri) 08:59:02 No.822748
>>822730
it is slower and less standards compliant