Article 13 around the corner and #Blackout21

Nom
Courriel
Sujet
Commentaire *
Fichier	Select/drop/paste files here
Mot de passe	(Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = champ obligatoire	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Insérer	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Ne pas remonter (vous pouvez également écrire sage dans le champ email) Spoiler images (ceci remplace les aperçus de vos images par des points d'interrogation) Masquer le pays (cette planche affiche votre pays quand vous envoyez un message sans cocher cette case)
Types de fichiers autorisés:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 La taille de fichier max est de 16 MB. Les dimensions max d'images sont 15000 x 15000. Vous pouvez mettre en ligne 1 par message.

File: 4b3fbad7dbb3ddd⋯.jpg (18,18 KB, 326x303, 326:303, 4b3fbad7dbb3dddd083aaca0a3….jpg)

Article 13 around the corner and #Blackout21 Anonymous 03/20/19 (mer.) 09:36:28 cce984 No.29357

I was wondering what are the average Frenchie's opinion on this whole mess of a legislation. From what I've come to understand, platforms such as this very one seems to be mostly exempt (not only because they're based in America with no European counterpart, but because they fail to reach the user and revenue quotas of the bigger players), as well as most attempts at parody and pastiche seem to be somewhat protected.

That being said, we all know how much of a shitter every filtering service really is, Youtube's Content ID check being at the forefront of fucking with even uttered words.

https://archive.is/Gox9j

https://archive.is/ylY77

As a reminder, the vote will be held on the 23rd of March.

By the way, BO, you should allow pdf uploads

Anonymous 03/20/19 (mer.) 09:52:16 70c7d5 No.29365

>>29357

They make the legislation hard to understand on purpose. But in the end, if the goal is to prevent memes and all sharing of copyrighted material, I think this will be the end of the big platforms, like Faceberg. Everyone will go on pirate websites, TOR, decentralized, peer-to-peer and anonymous systems. Maybe it'll be for the better of the web. Well, except boomers and normies (but even normies like pop-culture memes and seeing copyrighted stuff without paying, so who knows).

Anonymous 03/20/19 (mer.) 09:57:48 cce984 No.29368

>>29365

100% correct, though I'm sure it's going to be just like any other piece of scrap paper this unelected council passes, namely that each country will pick and choose which part to implement and on what severity.

I foresee a repeat of the Spanish situation, whereupon passing a bunch of shitty anti-news aggregator legislation, Google News stopped serving them and uh oh the government ended up losing something along the lines of tens of millions of yuros for their ineptitude.

>Everyone will go on pirate websites, TOR, decentralized, peer-to-peer and anonymous systems. Maybe it'll be for the better of the web.

My thoughts exactly, but I'm more of the idea that we're going to see a new intermediate between clear and deep web made of regional or niche communities but more open to inclusion.

Anonymous 03/20/19 (mer.) 10:20:48 70c7d5 No.29376

>>29368

Yes, different degrees or stratas of websites might occur. Maybe the big platforms will have to abide by the law and Faceberg will become the new MySpace (it's already dropping with the young). Then, some websites won't respect these rules (who will enforce that law anyway, and how ?). And there will always be sites outside Europe who are not supposed to follow that law, and all the illegal/dark/peer-to-peer/decentralized pirate stuff. They're trying to make the web like a big TV, but it's harder than it seems. I'm more worried about the blockings and new fees on the ISP side (paying more for video, for exemple, or paying to access certain services, they're starting to do that in the US). They could also devise a way of blocking what you do, directly on the ISP side.

Anonymous 03/20/19 (mer.) 10:24:44 cce984 No.29378

>>29376

>I'm more worried about the blockings and new fees on the ISP side (paying more for video, for exemple, or paying to access certain services, they're starting to do that in the US).

The way I've heard it works is they're trying to block people from going to Youtube and other similarly important services by locking them under a payawll, which is counterproductive as the entire reason why Youtube got so big in the first place is the fact that it allowed users to share videos freely. Look at Youtube Red, their pathetic attempt at making a Spotify clone, no one wants to pay for a service that is virtually free and once it's free the first time it's going to make other just as free services pop up in its wake.

Anonymous 03/20/19 (mer.) 10:37:41 70c7d5 No.29391

>>29378

Indeed, if they do this, alternatives will pop up and Youtube will become a big TV/Netflix. It's already shifting towards that, although there are still tons of nice content. I thought the ISPs could detect the type of data used (like video), put a cap on it, and make the user pay for the excess volume, but I might be mistaken.