/cuteboys/ - Boypussy

I loved my ex gf v much on a personal level, but I couldn't enjoy anything sexual with her. When she went down on me I'd have to imagine she was a guy etc.

>>342958

It's anonymous. Cmon son.

I've always been okay with dicks, but I wasn't interested in guys until I realized that cuteboys and traps exist. I liked my friend in highschool, and we kissed a few times, but I was a year ahead of him and since then he's gone off the grid, doesn't' use social media, joined the marines or something. RIP. I've enjoyed futanari porn since I first found it (though I still avoid the giant dick variety, and it aint futa if there's no pussy fyi). Fapped some to trannies here and there but I was always put off by their limp dicks. I finally caved and realized that I'm bi once I got into trap porn. With a petite body and a good face, they can be just as cute as girls, cum just like girls, wear the same cute things girls do, and as a bonus they are dramatically more likely to be interested in nerdy stuff and are dramatically less likely to decline sex.

top tier cuteboys are more appealing than women, but just harder to come by. I leave all my doors open.

Sexuality isn't black and white "straight or gay", but rather it's lights off or lights on. Lights off is closed minded and following the way nature intends for the continuation of the species. With the lights on, there's a shittton of different wavelengths to look at, and you just have to find out what your eyes like looking at. I'm not attracted to bears and regular men at all. If they're not a tomgirl or a trap or twink, I'm not really looking at them. I wouldn't say I'm gay. Even if I find a gay partner, I would say I'm in a gay relationship, but I'd still claim that I'm bi and only interested in cute, petite, femenine people.

>>342963

>>342962

Interesting. Thanks for the effort posts.

>>342929

Obviously I can't speak for other people, but I can tell you with absolute certainty that I'm not attracted to women. Mostly because I tried to be attracted to women for a pretty long time as I was growing up and telling myself I was straight. I have no problem at all with women and I can recognize when they look good and all that stuff, but I just feel no attraction to them on an instinctual, romantic level. Men on the other hand, my attraction to them is pretty natural and instinctual. I love qualities in men that are usually associated with, well, masculinity. Height, sharp features, strength, that kinda stuff. (obviously more, but that becomes more about personality) while features usually associated with women (cuteness, short height, soft features) do nothing for me. They're more things I strive to be myself (apart from height obviously. that's not really something one can strive for) than things I'm interested in pursuing. I know for a fact that even that's not the case for many gay guys though, mostly because I know several masc4masc gay guys.

If I had the choice to be with either, why would I bother going for just one? It seems like I'd needlessly be limiting myself and throwing away people I could potentially find really fantastic for some arbitrary desire to be a "true" gay. No, if there was attraction there I'd definitely act on it. If it was there, I would've found it during my teenage years when I was trying so hard to make it a thing.

Bisexals compose a completely different set from homosexuals. Only 3-5% of people are exclusively homosexual (meaning not attracted to the opposite sex at all). The amount of people that are bisexual to some degree is probably something more like 20%, so you're going to see a LOT more of them around, and some of them might call themselves "gay", too.

>>342983

So x % say they are exclusively gay but were they in the past? If we classified bi as anyone who has been attracted (physically, obviously) to women (ever) you'd see the number of exclusively gay guys drop, probably by a lot.

>>343055

they reason i ask here is because I don't take the official numbers at face value. You are relying on people telling the truth about their sexuality and questions are often limited.

>>343055

If we also classified bi as anyone straight who has ever been physically attracted to a man, you would probably end up with barely any exclusively-straight guys, either. That's why Kinsey made his scale primarily based upon sexual ACTIONS, because that's objective and quantifiable. A few times when a man was 12 and fapped to Playboys shouldn't devalue twenty years of regularly having sex with men; he's still completely gay (or at least upwards of 99%). I don't think you'd claim that a man who can freely admit that [insert male celebrity here] is attractive is bi and not straight. This is the exact same issue.

The thing is, sex and attraction are only tangentially related at best. People will have sex for any number of reasons other than being physically attracted to each other. There are also any number of reasons why being physically attracted to each other doesn't mean the two will have sex. Identifying as "straight" or "gay" is just shorthand to quickly inform others of the bare minimum of what defines your sexuality and dating interest. It doesn't mean "I will fuck every woman I can but think men are unattractive" or "I will fuck any man alive and women gross me out." It doesn't hold you exclusively to certain behaviors like some kind of legally-binding contract.

>>342929

I hate women. I don't even know if I'm gay, I just dress in girl clothes sometimes. I might be better classified as asexual

>So they had a choice and obviously they've made it. Am I right? Are most gays today of the Roman variety? Is the widespread gay cultural phenomenon just modern degeneracy?

Part of it could be a decision for a number of people. But the attraction itself generally isn't - these things actually tend to manifest very early. In my opinion, most people are probably bisexual. But if someone says "No, I was born liking girls and only girls" I'm not in any position to tell them otherwise.

And it's obvious WHY such preferences could be innate (if not merely incurable) - an evolutionary inclination towards heterosexuality is not hard to explain. And unless you assume that evolution is some magical sentient substitute for God and has a will to impose over humankind, then it should likewise not be hard to explain why instances of homosexuality exist.

Also, ancient Roman culture was vastly different and their views basically allowed for domtopping of the lower classes and an inclination towards pederasty. There were fundamental taboos applied which would make homosexual relations as they are today harder to find.

>>342929

Well OP, I think my generation sucks and bitches be cray, so I'm just thankful I'm fluid and bisexual. I think I might survive.

Some of us might be experimenting or might be curious and open minded, some of you might be in a similar predicament as I am, as unfortunate as it is. Love No Thots!