[ / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / clang / d / fringe / fur / htg / vore / zoo ]

/cuteboys/ - Boypussy

Dicks and butts
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 12 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 220795455a93372⋯.png (28.1 KB, 353x124, 353:124, Capture2.PNG)

 No.336198

Top or bottom?

pic unrelated.

 No.336199

Both or it gets boring.


 No.336200

>>336199

Alright fine,

Top, bottom, or switch?


 No.336204

Bottom. I wanted to be switch for a pretty long time, but the more I tried the more I realized it didn't work for me on any level. I'm kinda jelly of all the people who go effortlessly from top to bottom and back. I feel like it makes you way more exciting in the bedroom.


 No.336207

I top usually, but sometimes I like being submissive and getting rimmed/fingered. My bf is pretty big so getting penetrated hurts me a lot.


 No.336212

I'd like to be a switch, but all of my boyfriends so far have been "top only". At this point in my life, it seems increasingly unlikely that anything going around my dick or up my ass is going to be made of other than silicone, so it doesn't much matter anymore. But if it ever came up, I'd be comfortable with both, in theory.


 No.336217

bottom please

i have a yuge submission/masochism fetish


 No.336220

>>336204

That's okay, it's actually pretty cute.


 No.336225

exclusive bottom/submissive, good thing my bf is exclusive top/dominant.


 No.336228

I guess I go both. I've dated guys who only like to top and I've dated guys who only like to bottom. I remember one ex who was ridiculously hung but only bottomed, other than the occasional blowjob from me.


 No.336230

File: 30c3c80f4277b84⋯.jpg (118.87 KB, 345x396, 115:132, 1f6b406f9005d39ee9441dbe06….jpg)

Both, don't see the point in picking only one that's no fun.


 No.336231

Top > bottom by FAR IMO

Putting stuff in me cornhole doesn't feel right, stuffing someone elses cornhole does.


 No.336234

>>336220

How is it cute?

At any rate I've accepted the way my brain works pretty much. I don't really mind. Being versatile would've been great, but it seems like all guys who like me are exclusively tops anyway so in a weird way it kinda works out.


 No.336235

>>336212

I'd like to switch too, but it looks like potential bfs only want one or the other too. First I just need to get a bf though


 No.336241

>>336230

This

Being switch is most fun, I don't mind just being one state though if husbando wanted to strictly do one.


 No.336245

bottom, love to suck dick and getting fucked. but i don't want my penis or balls stimulated, keeps the physical focus more on my butt and prostate or mouth. most times i wear a chastity cage. learned to cum hands free from only anal stimulation like that. for me being a bottom is the best


 No.336268

>>336198

Top. I'm a guy that wants to have a cute trap/twink to cuddle and lewd with. I still want to keep things traditional and treat them as the girl in the relationship.


 No.336276

>>336268

>keep things traditional

>homosexual

U wot m8?


 No.336284

>>336276

I'm bi, so it's weird. I want to treat my partner like a girl even if it's a guy.


 No.336287

>>336230

Same. I mean I can get preferences for one or the other, but who can only fuck or get fucked? I was even casually with a guy who wanted me to fuck his ass but didn't want to blow me which was super bizarre. Makes no dog damned sense.

I met someone through the map here and he's mainly a sub bottom so guess I'll have to get use to only being a dom top.


 No.336290

>>336284

I'm traditional as well and would like this. And I fit your criteria too.


 No.336292

>>336290

Meet up then


 No.336293

>>336290

Oh.

I'm already in a long distance relationship with someone I really like at the moment. Was just posting in the thread to throw out my preferences.

Florida, 5'7''

Happy stupid fatguy 220lbs


 No.336317

>>336268

Wish I could find someone like this :(. I'd even cook and clean!


 No.336320

>>336204

Honestly, it feels like the opposite. I get people who expect me to be super masculine and dominant 24/7 and then lose interest the second they learn that I also like girl clothes and putting things in my butt. Or I get the exact opposite.


 No.336322

>>336320

Honestly I'd treat someone how they wanted, I mean we all want that, so it only seems fair to let you decide how you are feeling! Been running into crappy people?


 No.336325

>>336322

I wouldn't really blame them since sexual attraction isn't exactly a conscious decision.


 No.336326

>>336325

I get that too, but a relationship is give and take I'm saying


 No.336333

>>336326

Yeah, but I'm also boring and cynical, so it probably wasn't the only reason.


 No.336498

File: 7fabffec8aca35d⋯.png (3.67 MB, 2111x3000, 2111:3000, pg_020.png)

>>336320

Oh my femininity is non-negotiable. I kinda need that to be happy. I'd just like to have the flexibility to also be a top while being myself, but I just lack any and all instinct for it. I tried to get myself to focus on the idea of the physical feeling of it rather than the act of "dominating" a guy, but it just didn't work. It was still a turn-off for me.


 No.336502

>>336498

What if you don't move at all and someone powerbottoms? I'm cheering for you fem anon!


 No.336503

>>336498

Don't feel bad about that my swede cuteboy. You're just the type of boy I like <3


 No.336504

>>336498

You really are the cutest


 No.336515

File: 1344486cbced04e⋯.png (3.08 MB, 2108x3033, 2108:3033, 018.png)

>>336502

I don't know. I could maybe be coerced into trying it out if I was with someone really into it, which means I'm less opposed to it than actual dominant topping, but it also doesn't really turn me on at all and I'd never ask for it myself by nature.

>>336503

>>336504

Thanks. I mean I'm not sure if I agree, but still, thanks.


 No.337279

>big guy 4u 6'4" 210lbs /fit/

>tfw will never find a smol vers bf

>tfw will never get dominated by a skinny qt a foot shorter than me

>tfw will never find a bf I can carry around on my shoulders after rough mutual sex

Why live.


 No.337418

i would top but my dick is small and everyone seems to want a huge one


 No.337547

Still a boypussy virgin here but i'll probably prefer bottom


 No.338238

>>336515

>>336498

those images are super hot. do you have source/more like it with fem top and masc bottom?


 No.338240

File: 29708472c4abb89⋯.png (3.46 MB, 2111x3000, 2111:3000, pg_022.png)

File: 1c171df975fee99⋯.png (3.34 MB, 2108x3028, 527:757, 025.png)

>>338238

Chikan Josou Danshi x Ore and Josou Kareshi x Ore, both by ash wing. One of my favourite artists.


 No.338241

File: 09ac9956ac8080c⋯.png (334.71 KB, 601x588, 601:588, Thegoodstuff.png)

Bottom af


 No.338244

>>338240

thanks for the quick reply, those are super good


 No.338249

File: 2c4e57643a0bb02⋯.jpg (557.5 KB, 1038x1488, 173:248, 06.jpg)

>>338244

Not a problem. Always happy to share the ash wing love. Stuff like that comic is what got me wanting to be more vers. It's a shame that didn't work out for me. I guess when there's no actual desire or instinct to be a top, you can have all the curiousity in the world, but it's just not going to work.


 No.338255

>>338249

good luck swedish anon! i've given up trying to be picky. just trying to find a cuteboy near me that likes me.


 No.338257

>>338249

Ash wing got me to be more bottom actually, and now I like bottoming for my toys more than topping which I also haven't really done with another person either :3


 No.338258

File: e7cd3e73ee26c96⋯.jpg (29.87 KB, 500x385, 100:77, were_smug_about_that.jpg)

Depends. With a qt3.14 I'd do either or both.

With a more masculine guy I'd prefer to bottom desu.


 No.338260

File: 2d0c6e0ef513624⋯.jpeg (483.97 KB, 600x800, 3:4, 938be621760b525d7bfa5ec5a….jpeg)

>>338257

Oh ash wing didn't get me into topping. Just gave me a curious interest in it that I wanted to explore but couldn't because of the reasons mentioned above, and now I've lost interest and sort of accepted that I'm just not built for topping, either mentally, psychologically or just biologically. It's not in my blood, but I love bottoming, so I guess in the end of the day it wouldn't make sense to try to force myself to be more vers anyway. Even when I try as hard as I can to imagine myself as dominant in the bedroom, the best I can muster is imagining semi-powerbottoming some (masculine) dude, but even that feels kinda like a stretch. Possibly a stretch I could see myself try to explore in the future though.

Ash wing's bottom characters are definitely just as cute as his tops though.


 No.338332

>>338241

Are you the anon that made the thread on /b/ by chance? Pizza one


 No.338759

>>337279

Just give it time! I'm sure that won't be so hard to find after all, especially since we are all smol compared to those stats :P


 No.338904

File: 0e1d9d4d68330f9⋯.png (188.29 KB, 517x385, 47:35, Goodmorals.png)

>>338332

Ye.

Why do you ask?


 No.338949

>>337279

Umm…Where are you? How fit are we talking? Fit as in toned with low body fat, or bear?


 No.338982

vers I guess

before my bf I thought I'd prefer bottom. I can't bottom currently (got myself a fissure with a toy q.q) and my bf wanted me to top.

And honestly - it was pretty gud


 No.338986

bottom

i guess im not opposed to topping but im extremely submissive by nature and i hardly use my dick during sex at it is


 No.338993

File: 34540814cdfce48⋯.jpg (484.97 KB, 2000x2156, 500:539, 2529r62618.jpg)

>>338949

I'm not really willing to say where tbh, but it's not US or EU. I am white though.

I'm low bodyfat and fairly muscular I guess. About a B7 on the /fit/ chart (pic related)


 No.340029

Bottom


 No.340125

how do i learn to top, guys?


 No.340138

>>340125

Same way you learned how to bottom.

Buy a toy and have sex with it.


 No.340316

I love feeling more submissive to my partner than dom, so if I had to choose I'd clearly be a bottom, but I wouldn't mind if he wanted me to top him from time to time


 No.340833

>>336284

I would love this however I think I might stop loving it after gay death :/


 No.340879

>>340833

Gay death is subjective and shallow anon!

>>336290

Where ya from?


 No.340890

>>340879

>Where ya from?

New York. It's obvious why I can't find something like this. Progressive cities are where traditional relationships go to die.


 No.340966

>>340890

>>340890

Really? I'm about two hours away :P but I take the more submissive role


 No.340971

>>340966

I'm also submissive but I don't look for sex. I'm VERY traditional


 No.341667

>>336198

I'm a top, but then again I'm a biscum.


 No.341760

I'm a bottom in my current relationship, but this is my first relationship period, so idunno if I'd ever top.

I'm slowly working my way up to better anal, since the few times we've done it neither of us knew what we were doing and it wasn't that great for me. Little things like moving too fast from fingers to benis, and me not being completely comfortable with the feeling of movement inside me.

I have a set of plugs coming to help me get used to the feeling of something there, and I'll probably order a dildo/vibe at some point to get used to the movement.


 No.341771

Bottom. Why are you here if you top???


 No.341799

>>341771

Because it's possible to be an adorable top, and because if there weren't any masculine tops here, people like me wouldn't have anyone they liked on this board.


 No.341876

File: 4a3a0f6939e1786⋯.jpg (85.44 KB, 611x899, 611:899, g_19.jpg)

>>341771

This is why.


 No.341913

Bottom, I thought I could be switch for awhile but topping is too much for me, I'm just not dominant at all


 No.341985

I switch but it is rare for me to ever do anything like it since I really only see it as a release from wanting it so I can go back to more enjoyable things. So i mainly just do it myself or have my partner do something for me as the whole work up to the sex part can take way too long.


 No.342010

has any bottom ever came hands-free from getting fucked?


 No.342451

>>336268

Exactly what I'd want but I don't think I'd find a guy to do that to me.


 No.342512

>>341799

bottom here, would hate an """adorable""" top

i'm glad there's normal gay tops too but how many bottoms are into feminine tops?


 No.342516

Top. I'd be switch but my little qt is a strict bottom and he is such a pathetic excuse for a man that him fucking me is laughable at best so I am a top. I'm happy with it, having a tiny adorable qt that refers to me as "master" is worth it.


 No.342545

>>342512

oh I agree. I'm not really attracted to feminine forms of cuteness. I love tall, strong and masculine dudes.

I've seen plenty of dudes that are into cute looking tops though. Usually feminine guys that are mostly into other feminine guys, but in some cases masculine dudes who have a role reversal fetish. Of course for some people it's not even that, and you might say that the only reason we think it's weird for someone to want a cute feminine top is because we've been conditioned to see gay relationships in an almost 'hetero' way where naturally the more feminine one is the bottom, which isn't really necessarily true.


 No.342608

Bottom here. I get really turned on by the idea of bottoming and acting fem in the bedroom (for either qt twink or masculine alpha male). I'm a masculine dude myself, so sometimes I think it's weird and sketch myself from ever doing it. I won't lose sleep from never acting fem, but fuck is it a turn on :/


 No.345477

>>341771

People here look for relationships. I take it cuteboy seekers should be welcome here so cuteboys can find a nice person to ride on and cuddle with.


 No.345480

File: 1c616f122a31ab5⋯.png (233.74 KB, 620x640, 31:32, 5242.png)

Exclusive top here. I'm not doing anything gay as long as I'm not on the receiving end.


 No.345482

>>345480

>exclusive top

>I only receive

???


 No.345484

>>345480

Nice, you described exactly why I can't take "exclusive tops" seriously and just cringe at them right after stating you are one.


 No.345485

>>345477

>using cuteboy as a descriptor and adding your own definitions to it

There it is again. What the fuck does it mean now? Does "cuteboy" mean bottom now?


 No.345489

>>336317

You rang? Top barra here.


 No.345604

File: bc3930777e20f59⋯.jpg (219.91 KB, 800x600, 4:3, 4351f2458678239d4ce283f43b….jpg)

>>336207

Thats fucking hot.


 No.345605

File: 1de173261aac0d7⋯.jpeg (386.04 KB, 858x604, 429:302, 74cf31c94baaaa935c1a023bf….jpeg)

Top if I want to mess around, Bottom for when I want to really love my man.


 No.345606

>>336245

Damn I actually hope I learn to do that.


 No.345615

>>345485

Cuteboy means a cute boy. Someone that is into cute boys doesn't necessarily have to be a cute boy themselves.


 No.345619

I've only ever bottomed bf is 3tight5me but I'm super subby and the only real reason I want to try topping is because I'm curious what it feels like.


 No.345627

File: b0c4db81a5cc254⋯.jpg (12.33 KB, 255x137, 255:137, donegoofedknucklehead.jpg)

>>341771

>implying cute top/bara bottom isn't the best combination ever

>>345482

Sven, learn reading comprehension.


 No.345646

>>345615

So cuteboy means everyone who isn't ugly? Gotcha.


 No.345656

File: 5f76e5655f291d0⋯.png (342.72 KB, 481x481, 1:1, 1428353793622 (1).png)

>>345627

It was a double negative

> I'm not doing anything gay as long as I'm not on the receiving end.

As in he'll do gay stuff as long as he's on the receiving end. Which would make him..?

What he meant to write was:

>I'm not doing anything gay as long as I'm on the receiving end

or

>I'll do gay stuff as long as I'm not on the receiving end

You're just wrong. Play again


 No.345661

>>345656

>this isn't my first language but i'm convinced i know the rules of this language better than native speakers

lol you're so fucking wrong though


 No.345667

>>345666

>I'm not doing anything gay as long as I'm on the receiving end

is implying that being a bottom is not gay

>I'll do gay stuff as long as I'm not on the receiving end

is the exact opposite of the previous sentence


 No.345668

>>345667

I deleted my post because I thought better of continuing this argument, but if you disagree I'll continue. The original post I quoted was not

>I'm not doing anything gay as long as I'm on the receiving end

The original post I quoted was

> I'm NOT doing anything gay as long as I'm NOT on the receiving end.

In other words, restructured that comes down to "I'm doing gay stuff as long as I'm NOT NOT on the receiving end"

Cut out the double negative and that becomes

"I'm doing gay stuff as long as I'm on the receiving end"

If you think what you said is the original post I quoted then you've blatantly misread that post.


 No.345671

>>345668

>restructured that comes down to "I'm doing gay stuff as long as I'm NOT NOT on the receiving end"

Wrong. Restructured that comes down to "I'm straight as long as I'm on top." You just add a word wherever the fuck you want in a sentence because it's a "negative". With your own argument of the negatives bullshit, you would flip the meanings, not move words around to completely change the meaning of the sentence you cuck. Go back to riding Jamal's dick.


 No.345675

>>345671

Am I being baited? Because in that case I applaud you for being a good troll.

Either way, I give up. If you can't even see the double negative when it's capitalized for you and you're still this confident and this wrong at the same time, I'm wasting my time.


 No.345676

>>345675

>if you can't even just ignore that i MOVED words, then i'm wasting my time

Correct.


 No.349346

90% top, 10% bottom, but I have been leaning more bottom lately.


 No.349980

>>336204

Stockholm plz lord


 No.350006

50/50, but I can go 100% either way if I like the person enough.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / clang / d / fringe / fur / htg / vore / zoo ]