/cuteboys/ - Boypussy

oh also looking for tips to trimm/shave

it hurts like a bitch If I do it

>>331071

>hurts to shave

lol wut. i just use a cheap razor and no pain. go light and dont apply crazy amount of pressure?

>>331070

id like to know too. cutfag here.

>>331075

>lol wut. i just use a cheap razor and no pain. go light and dont apply crazy amount of pressure?

sorry, have to correct myself here

the day after shaving hurts like fuck when the new hair comes out, same with trimming too, when I trimm too low

also I never even tried to trimm my balls, because I am a bit squeamish, particularly because of those ridges you see

>>331070

Personally I don't care, but foreskin can be more fun and aesthetically pleasing.

>>331077

what about shaving/trimming?

I figure you guys now about that stuff

>>331078

subs should be hairless, doms prob should be only trimmed. no one wants hair in their mouth while sucking dick. it also traps odor.

Well, it's bad for you (p-plus foreskin is just fun…), but it doesn't speak badly of you (unless you count the brain scarring), and that's what would really matter to me.

would avoid fucking a cut boy unless they were absurdly cute and it made up for it

I had to do it when i was younger because of phimosis, but wish I wouldn't have had to. I think I'm pretty cute and my dick looks fine but this thread is just making me sad, just kill me fam.

>>331164

it's just banter lmao

Maybe it's just a 'murican thing but I think cutbois are pretty rare here. It's a shitty thing to do and I hope more people will realize it. I'd still date one though, not like it's a big deal breaker.

Like in Canada it's only 30% of people. Interestingly, 80% or circumcised fathers do it to their sons, while only 15% of uncircumcised do it. Like jeez, you'd think they wouldn't want to put them through the same experience.

>>331366

medical companies in the US convince parents that circumcision is perfectly healthy and is actually beneficial to child even though its the opposite, parents who have it done don't know any better. Foreskins are also sold off to beauty industry companies for use in their products, and to get around the fact that they're cutting off a human body part and selling it, foreskins are labeled as "human waste"

its actually fucking disgusting

>>331126

This. Cut dicks are a complete turnoff.

>>331070

I'm an American who was cut with a European boyfriend who was not cut. This has been a source of considerable emotional torment for my boyfriend as well as myself. I didn't think anything of it until we started sharing dick pics and he said to me that it makes him sad every time he sees it. Unlike most people, he already knew the implications of circumcision (what was lost, the risks involved in the procedure, how emotionally traumatizing it is for children, etcetera) before we met. He told me that his reaction every time he sees it is not "oh that's hot" but instead

>*sniff* poor guy

He also said to me over the years that followed that it filled him with considerable emotional distress every time he saw a cut dick or otherwise saw a mention of male genital mutilation in the media, because he has so much empathy for people who are in that position that it was difficult to deal with. He's since learned to live with it, but the years of emotional torture were certainly not necessary. It's traumatizing thinking about what was done and how common it is, and I wouldn't wish that upon anyone. Unfortunately it is necessary in order for people to understand why it must not be done.

Also, for >>331164

I'm really sorry, but phimosis is only a valid reason to circumcise an infant if it's tight enough to be a serious health risk, which it usually isn't because it would have presented a problem before birth. Doctors Opposing Circumcision has a page on their website entitled "Conservative Treatment" in which they go down the list of excuses for circumcision and explain, for medical professionals, how alternative treatments which will not damage the boy are viable. I recommend you read it, lest you (if you ever become a parent) make the same mistake your parents did.

http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/conservative-treatment/

The real reason why you were circumcised is so that the doctor can make money. There are corporations here in America which make money off of harvesting materials (such as stem cells and collagen) from foreskins (for medical research and for feminine beauty products, respectively) and have financially incentivized doctors and academics to encourage as many circumcisions as possible. Follow the money and you'll see how unnecessary your circumcision truly was.

Again, I'm sorry. No one wants to hear these things, but someone has to say it.

>>343465

To be honest your BF sounds kinda dickish from that. It's one thing to take a stance against needless circumcision. I sort of agree with that. It's another thing entirely to use every opportunity where your bf shares nudes with you to get on your soapbox and complain about it being circumcised. It's like if you had a bf that didn't have a pinky and every time you hold hands with him you complain about how horrible it is that some people don't have all five fingers on both hands.

Personally, I disagree with needless circumcision, but I'm not bothered by the aesthetic difference between cut and uncut. Like my political stances won't make me turn down a dude who's cut. I don't care that much.

>>343465

>>343487

yeah, I already heard enough about that, in particular on the internet

there is no need to make people feel so worthless

>>343487

There is a considerable difference between having an emotional reaction out of empathy and making fun of someone for having been mutilated. Learn what the difference is, please, you fucking psychopath. If you understood what a violation of basic human rights infant genital mutilation is maybe you might understand why it might cause that reaction in people.

>>343489

>there is no need to make people feel so worthless

What about what I said gave you the impression that anything he said to me made me feel worthless? Do you know what made me feel worthless? Having a bit cut off of my genitals with no regard whatsoever for my mental or physical well-being. My boyfriend gave me the emotional support I needed to move on. Again, learn the difference.

>>343507

it makes me feel worthless, anon :(

>>343511

If you feel worthless because someone prefers a physical body part that you do not have, then you are placing value in the wrong places. There is more to you than your body. Find someone who sees it and you'll be much happier for it.

The same boyfriend who was distressed by my mutilation is still with me, because we provided valuable emotional support to one another and continue to do so. He was willing to overcome his anxiety for my sake, and that was the least of the sacrifices that he made.

Don't give up on yourself. You're a sweet person, and there will be someone out there who sees that in you.

>>343511

I second this anon

>>343514

>>343514

too late, I challenge you to a duel :(

>>343507

Jesus calm down, lol. I was just making sure your bf wasn't making already-bad problems with your self-image worse by constantly reiterating his view on them when I assume your reason for sharing your nudes with him wasn't to make him upset. I wasn't aware that being concerned about the feelings of strangers made me a psychopath. I'm sorry if I offended you, anon.

>hating someone for something catastrophic that happened to them when they were born

I don't care what your dick looks like. The person matters so much more.

>>331076

> the day after shaving hurts like fuck when the new hair comes out, same with trimming too, when I trim too low

Quit being a wimp. A little itching is easy to ignore.

>>343806

It looks like you're responding to OP, and I'm not them, but I don't hate people for being circumcised, I hate the act of circumcision itself. My reaction to the sight of a circumcised dick is more one of sympathetic pain and anxiety, I have a very anxious reaction to circumcised straight men in particular because statistically speaking if they have a male child they're significantly more likely to have him circumcised. In fact I think men who are circumcised are even more likely than women are to have their male child circumcised, in the same way that women who are circumcised are more likely than men to have a female child circumcised.

So, to clarify, it's not hatred. It's a combination of empathy, sympathy, and anxiety. Psychology sure is a bucket of rainbows!

>>343830

Ich feel you, bruder.

Any time I get into some sort of lewd community it's

>ew cut dicks

>I would never touch a circumcised cock

>people with cut dicks are disgusting

It's pretty fucking bad.

And then we have shit like, this other faggot going on about his bf's "anxiety" and shit. Now, I understand how bad circumcision is, and believe it should stop completely, but pity isn't going to grow foreskins back. For fuck's sake. It sounds less like being sympathetic about genital mutilation, and more like being a crybaby about something that you will never remember to make yourself feel better. People with cut dicks don't want pity. They would just like to fuck without drama, for fucks sake.

I can imagine it now

>whip out cut dick

>suddenly other partaker in the coital ritual lets out a shrill gasp

>"oh my gosh, I'm so sorry"

>try to think of what to say, confused for a bit, "what?"

>"do you know how many babies are tortured every second by circumcision? do you know how many medical and cosmetic corporations are making money off of little baby foreskins?"

>babble a bit, still confused "e-excuse me?"

>"I'm so sorry, anon. I'm so sorry you were tortured as a pure little babe so big pharma and the jews could make money off of your bloody infant penis"

>"y-you too"

>>344586

There's nothing that can be done about it. Is it considered pity if a military veteran reveals that his leg is a prosthetic because his real one was blown off in a war? Am I supposed to be a bad person if I don't want to run a footrace with this guy who has damaged legs?

>>344611

just don't make us feel bad about it

It's not nice to be constantly reminded about how you lost something.

>>344611

I'm uncut so I can't really say I'm party to the experience of constantly being pitied when you're not asking for it, but I can definitely understand that someone might not always want to be told about how bad they have it. I'd say there's a difference between feeling pity for someone and constantly telling someone that there's something wrong with their body.

To go back to your veteran comparison, you're right. It's hard not to pity a veteran who's lost his leg. There's a difference between pitying said veteran and constantly telling him "It must suck to have only one leg. People with only one leg are pretty gross looking and I'd never date a person with only one leg to be honest. It also means you can't run without help and that's really shitty."

Things like that might come from a good place, and you might think you're sympathising with him by saying those kind of things, but actually more likely than not he does not want to hear that every time he leaves the house, and he's well aware of the the disadvantages of his body.

Fighting against infant circumcision is not a bad cause by any means, but people on here are often unnecessarily dickish to circumcised people.

>>331354

>fuck the US

How about instead of hating your country you hate those directly responsible for destroying it and chopping up your dick?

The kikes need to be snuffed out of our world. They do nothing but cause misery.

>>344644

shut up already ;__;

>>344611

What a shitty comparison.

>>331070

>How bad is it for you if someone had a cut dick?

It's a deal breaker for me.

>>344633

>but people on here are often unnecessarily dickish to circumcised people

I think you're blowing it way out of proportion. But let's put it this way: the biggest predictor of whether or not an infant will be circumcised in the USA is whether or not his father is circumcised. If I can guilt trip just ONE OF THEM into choosing not to do it because he thinks it's made his dick inferior, that's a massive success. We sure aren't going to make any progress convincing the politicians or corporations or doctors who are making millions of dollars off of the practice.

>>344586

I'm very sorry that someone had the gall to tell you that you were circumcised and why that's a bad thing, but if the only voices men can hear are the voices that say "you should get your dick cut" then we aren't going to stop the problem of people mutilating their children, are we?

Yes, when people see victims of infant genital mutilation they feel queasy. What the fuck do you expect? This shit is fucked up. Imagine someone who suffered a severe acid burn to the crotch showing up on an image board and posting pics around and getting offended when people tell them that their scarred and charred dick doesn't appeal to them.

If you want to have sex minus the drama then what you need is to get into a serious relationship with someone who can help you through your body issues, not someone who's going to pretend they don't exist. Randos are not the ones to go for here.

>>344644

Actually, it was Victorian Christian doctors who hated masturbation, and the US military during WWI who thought circumcision would reduce VDs. Jews had little involvement.

>>344697

>Actually, it was Victorian Christian doctors who hated masturbation,

Why? The same arguments as people doing NoFap today?

>>344699

Idk what the current line is - but back then, it was basically that masturbation leads to excessive lustiness and insanity and whathaveyou. Kellogg recommended that adolescents who were "chronic masturbators" be circumcised without any anesthesia so that they'd remember it and be even less inclined to touch themselves.

>>344697

>dude actually the ancient Egyptians were the first to practice circumcision lmaooo

Shut the fuck up retard. The kikes are the ones pushing it in the west and so it's the kikes that are responsible.

Fuck off kike.

>>344703

they really wanted to make all boy's school a place for sexual experimentation, didn't they?

>>344704

>>dude actually the ancient Egyptians were the first to practice circumcision lmaooo

Except this is your logic, not mine. I literally told you who pushed it in the US, and you're the one insisting on tracing it solely to an ancient custom practiced by a group who were a cultural minority in the US. You'd rather point to ancient Judea, tho.

Weird af mushroomdicks are weird.

But id deal with that and ignore it if the guy in question is nice otherwise.

>>344717

I noticed I have a bit of mushroom dick too when I'm really hard and my foreskin is back. when the skin is over it looks almost normal but when I'm really horny and it's back it's quite noticeable. kinda self conscious about it the more I've payed attention to it

>>344712

>the kikes didn't push it, it was those evil (((christian))) doctors!

>muh cultural minority

Do you know how fucking over represented kikes are in medical fields retard?

I'm not claiming that the west were somehow influenced directly from fucking judaism itself.

If the sole routes of it were strictly based on muh ebul christian rednecks then it would have died off when christianity died. But it didn't. Because the jews dominate medicine. Every attempt at exposing circumcision as harmful is shut down by the kikes. Anyone who attempts to research how damaging it is towards the infants suddenly finds their funding to dry up out of no where.

But yes, let's keep blaming those stupid christians that no longer even remotely represented in the medical fields. I'm sure there are just 1,000's of stupid doctors who think that circumcision keeps people from jerking off or keeps their dicks clean. Surely this must be the answer. Every single doctor is just really fucking stupid. Slicing open a babies dick doesn't phase them. Preforming unnecessary surgery that has in incredibly high risk of fucking killing the child has never once been concerned a stupid fucking decision by these doctors.

Kill yourself you kike fuck.

>>344722

Are you trolling or actually this uninformed about things you're passionate about? Circumcision doesn't bother doctors because they see it as a routine operation. They do it way too often for it to bother them because of it being tradition in the US. but they're not usually the ones who decide to circumcise babies. Unless there's prevalent health issues that require it, circumcision is usually decided by the parents. This elective circumcision, the kind that has nothing to do with religion and the one that's so prominent in the US vs Europe, does indeed come from puritanical doctors in the 1920s who pushed it as a way to stop children from masturbating. People just sort of haven't stopped doing it yet, which is pretty shitty. The numbers are steadily declining though, which is good.

You're right that Christians aren't to blame for the modern prevalence of circumcision. It's just rooted in traditionalism. 'his should look like mine' and all that jazz.

>>344734

>circumcision is usually decided by the parents

Not really. The doctors tell them to do it, because they make money when it is done. The parents simply listen because they don't know any better, and assume the doctor has their baby's best interests in mind. When the doctor tells you to take this medicine because you will no longer be sick, you don't question it; you just do it. When the doctor tells you to cut a teeny-tiny piece of skin off your baby, and gives a litany of bullshit reasons that it will vastly improve his sex life, make him more appealing to women, and give him resistance to STDs, you'll do that, too.

It doesn't take being a Jew to be a money-grubbing selfish asshole who puts their bank account over the health of others, it just takes being American. Medicine and medical college is a highly competitive and cutthroat place, so just like lawyers and businessmen, literally all doctors are complete sociopaths who have no qualms crushing the lives of their peers or customers to get ahead. Any TV show you've seen where doctors are shown as nice people who care about their patients and want to better society is pure nonsense propaganda. The nice people graduate from medical school, and then become VETERINARIANS, not doctors. There's nothing Jewish about that, it's pure AMERICAN CAPITALISM. Our society highly encourages the creation and fostering of these kinds of people, which explains basically everything wrong with the country.

Doctors often actively encourage it. And when they don't they neglect to inform the parents of the facts. That it's an unnecessary procedure that has been proven to cause severe psychological damage and could potentially result in complications that could threaten the infants life.

Kikes are to blame for actively shutting down attempts to expose circumcision for what it is. Kikes actively cut off funding and shut down research trying to prove that circumcision is harmful.

Fucking sweden and your autism man. Nothing "just is". People don't "just" still circumcise because they are stupid and it's tradition. Chopping off baby dicks is something that most sane people call into question. It's the kikes that are constantly peddling their narrative with slide issues that are preventing a serious fucking problem from being legally and scientifically addressed. It's the kikes pressing their thumb against anyone looking to save infants from these barbaric acts.

>>344782

>capitalism is everything wrong with our country

No it isn't. It's certainly up there but niggers and kikes are a bigger problem. Capitalism favours the kikes but in a society that's a complete fucking mixing pot capitalism is the only way you can function. With an ethnically homogeneous society then you can start working your way into more socialist ideology but the west will never be ethnically homogeneous so that's a moot point.

Without cutthroat doctors America wouldn't be the leading innovator in medicine.

>>344734

>prevalent health issues that require [circumcision]

The only legitimate medical reason to circumcise a baby is one that would also require amputation of any other body part. Most of the "medical reasons" to circumcise children are bullshit. Just to give you an example, if a boy somehow gets his foreskin caught in a zipper (this happens somehow) the doctor will tell the parent that it's necessary to cut off the boy's foreskin rather than, for instance, cutting the zipper open and treating the injured skin. Just by (((coincidence))), the doctor also makes more money from cutting skin and ripping it off the glans than they would from cutting a pair of trousers.

>>344734

>circumcision is usually decided by the parents

Which explains why there have been legal battles waged in the United States because doctors have been cutting baby dicks without the parents' consent. Yes, this happens. Apparently if a baby boy needs surgery for any reason and they have a consent form the doctors will just decide to circumcise the kid without asking the parents first. In spite of the fact that it's a "very important decision" doctors don't seem to be at all concerned with getting parental consent before mutilating babies.

>>344815

>Without cutthroat doctors America wouldn't be the leading innovator in medicine

Along with all your Jew boogyman bullshit, you sure have an idiotic view of America. It hasn't been the "leading innovator" of jack fucking shit since the 70's.

>>344717

Ich habe aber kein Pilzpenis.

Also funny how this thread is so active all of a sudden

It would mean they're jewish or muslim or generally brown, neither are any positive in my mind. It'd be bad tbh