>>311248
>But you're admitting that you have to massively lower your standards to get dick.
Yes. My only point is gay sex is easier to obtain, not that you're gonna be fucking 9s and 10s.
>you're just not accounting for the fact that desperate and unattractive and unlikable women exist too
I did
>>311185
>Even if you have 0 standards having sex with men is 100x easier than getting woman to fuck you
The thing is less attractive woman still have much more value than bottom of the barrel men. I guarantee you if a fat ugly girl posted a thread looking for a bf she'd have at least a dozen takers, compared to even an average guy posting the same thread who would more than likely get nothing. Its just the way things are. Pussy is more valuable than dick.
>"Men are only interested in physical attractiveness, women are only interested in social status."
Admittedly I failed to mention there are exceptions to this, but this is just a pattern I've observed, something I feel within myself, and something that guys with much more experience with dating than any of us will also backup.
I didn't mean to imply woman were wrong for what they are attracted to, in fact I think men are much more shallow in comparison when you think about it, because girls are more concerned with character and overall effectiveness as a man than just looks, but this is what makes it harder to get them as opposed to hooking up with guys.
>so I suppose it makes sense that you'd blame all those cruel shallow status-obsessed women for the fact that you're forever alone.
No, I'm well aware that I am a sorry excuse for a man who doesn't even deserve the girls I have the nerve to call unattractive, but my point still stands, getting dick is easier than getting pussy, there is no debating this.
>>311252
>It's not fucking hard.
Maybe not, but its not nearly as easy as getting dick.