No.874361
A thread to highlight how good Marvel used to be.
No.874362
>implying marvel was ever good
No.874373
>>874372
The only Hulk that could transform at will.
No.874397
Man I can't even begin to care
No.874436
>>874372
>ywn strip search she-hulk
No.874445
>>874438
>That Venom Picture
>Wearing Spidey Shorts
>The lure having teeth
>That green fucking spit
That is amazing.
No.874518
>>874438
Swimsuit specials should really be a thing again.
No.874520
No.874531
No.874535
>>874518
>Swimsuit specials should really be a thing again.
Not with all the SJWs in Marvel currently.
No.874635
>>874518
Anyone have the complete Marvel Swimsuit issues?
No.874689
>>874635
Dont worry, anon, I bet someone will post it real soon.
No.874694
>>874640
You autists do realise that there's no difference between pre-pubescent boys and girls from the waist up?
No.874704
>>874694
Yes and a fetus is just a clump of cells
>>>/asylum/
No.874720
>>874535
Even though Marvel doesn't do it anymore, other companies still do it. Bless Udon.
No.874729
>>874704
What?
I'm a medical professional and yes, there are no fucking differences between pre-pubescent boys and girls from the waist up. That's kind of what pre-pubescent implies. I've seen plenty of kids that you could assume were girls but were actually boys and vice versa (because a lot of parents dress their kids like complete shit and don't even give a fuck about their clothes) and the only way to know it wasn't a boy or a girl was because it was written on their papers what their sex was.
Comparing >>874694's comment with what abortion apologists say is so retarded I can't even wrap my head around it, maybe you should go to >>>/asylum/
No.874734
>>874729
>I've seen plenty of kids that you could assume were girls but were actually boys and vice versa
I've seen grown adults that you could assume were women but were actually men and vice versa, that's not a point.
That said, condoning female child nudity because "lol it's the same as a boy" goes against all kinds of morality and that's what I'm criticizing.
No.874738
>>874734
Except that she's not nude, she's topless. It's a non-issue because THERE'S NOTHING THERE
Idiot
No.874790
>>874738
>playing vocabulary lawyer when you have no idea what words mean
k
No.874900
>>874734
>I've seen grown adults that you could assume were women but were actually men and vice versa, that's not a point.
It absolutely is a point because there is something called "secondary sexual characteristics" that can be objectively observed in people after they reach puberty. The way hair is distributed, breast growth, height, muscle structure, voice, etc, etc that create a huge difference between what a normal XX and a XY person looks like.
I don't think I was clear with what I meant by "getting boys and girls mixed up" thing in my original post so let me put it like this:
If you lined up a thousand normal pre-pubescent kids and looked at them from behind, or from the front while they covered their genitals, all of them with the same haircut, you would have a pretty hard time telling which ones are boys and which ones are girls.
Do the same with a thousand post-pubescent people and you'd get close to all, if not all of them, right, because of secondary sexual characteristics.
>That said, condoning female child nudity because "lol it's the same as a boy" goes against all kinds of morality and that's what I'm criticizing.
This is a completely different issue altogether and wasn't in your first post. I don't know how sheltered you are but it's pretty common for small girls to walk around without anything covering their tops in beaches or at their homes. And it doesn't go "against all kinds of morality", it's just a kid doing what a kid does, it's not sexual. If you look at >>874640 and immediately think there's something sexual going on on it then maybe you have some moral problems. Complaining about non-sexual nudity is the type of fake moralism pushing that people with no actual morals like to do.
No.874918
>>874535
Maybe we could make our own annual /co/ swimsuit specials. Choose some /co/ characters to be featured every summer, come together with some ideas for poses and text to go with the pin ups and have our drawfags claim the ideas/characters and drawn them. After that some anon(s) put together the swimsuit issue as a PDF or whatever. A 8/co/ project.
No.874931
>>874919
Too bad Adam Hughes turned into an SJW.
No.874933
>>874931
Was it really him and not his wife and/or assistant?
His FB page always seemed like it was curated by someone else, because many posts were in third person ("Adam will be appearing at this con next month…").
The spazz-out post in question seemed like it was just his wife or assistant or whatever who was sick of off-topic troll messages. Or even if Adam himself was sick of it, I don't really equate that with him being an SJW. At least, I hope not.
No.874937
>>874362
They had balls though.
No.874976
>>874900
>it's pretty common […]
Gay prides are also pretty common, does that make them anything short of repulsive?
>And it doesn't go "against all kinds of morality", it's just a kid doing what a kid does, it's not sexual.
Nice opinions but where is the argument?
Also, "just a kid doing what a kid does" is nothing close to a justification because kids don't choose what to wear at any time. It normalizes nudity in their minds and I take issue with that, because as we have all seen the slippery slope is not a fallacy but an absolute truth when it comes to j*ws subverting Christian morality.
Naked kids may seem fine at a first glance but it's a sign of just how far we've gotten on Mr. Shekelstein's wild ride.
>If you look at >>874640 and immediately think there's something sexual going on on it then maybe you have some moral problems
No, I have learned that where there's smoke there's fire, and I know also that perverts have liked to take cover behind "Come on, it's the current year!" and "lol I'm just pushing the boundaries what are you a peasant this is art" since time immemorial; when you put all this together your suspicion is raised immediately at any precursor of degeneracy real or possible. I just have a hair trigger when it comes to these things.
No.876735
No.876893
>>874937
>something's not kosher
why doesn't he call her a kike instead of a mutie?
No.876894
>>874729
>I'm a medical professional
spending his time on 8chan, ok.
clearly not the mental side of things, if you can't see why there's something objectionable about little girls naked in panties. sounds like you're the autistic one, man.
No.876895
>>874900
>I don't know how sheltered you are but it's pretty common for small girls to walk around without anything covering their tops in beaches or at their homes.
bullshit.
>t. had a younger sister
>went to the beach a lot when I was younger
No.877789
Anyone got that one chart with the good Deadpool Stories?
No.878669
>>874635
those are ultrarae man
No.878767
>>876714
>dat back on jubilee
bruh, wasn't she like 13 here
No.879365
Still looking for swimsuits?
No.879383
Drop the SJWs and bring back the swimsuits
No.879707
>>879383
is that colossus in a speedo? and kitty behind him?
No.879798
>>879707
Gotta be Wonder Man, there's a "W" on his junk.
No.880057
>>874376
I like how on the third page, panel 4, you can literally see her nipples.
"Why is she naked?"
"The more important question is, how can we make her more naked?"
No.880068
>>879798
Shit you're right, I thought those were shadows
No.880069
>>880057
It was a pretty impressive slip thanks to the inker
now call me when someone sneaks in some pubic hairs
No.880107
>>879383
>Hulk wearing a speedo
I never thought I would see that.
No.880905
No.881247
>>880069
>call me when someone sneaks in some pubic hairs
I gotta wonder, after so many years, someone must have done it at some point.
And no, if it's a "mature" comic, it doesn't count.
No.882764
I guess as /co/'s resident oldfag I should storytime. I'll pick something from back when stories had actual structure.
No.882772
Still brings a manly tear to my eye *sniff*.
No.882815
>>882768
This has more lols than a Steve Gerber comic.
No.882900
>>882772
>3rd pic
So that's the scene they were recreating in that Thor trailer.
No.882940
>>882900
Yeah basically. I really hope they don't fuck this up.
No.882967
>>876454
>>876455
Is that a Snark?
>>874976
>>876895
I don't know where the fuck you people come from but you're both nuts and you've clearly never been around kids.
No.883046
>>882967
>you're being mean to my feelings how dare you your life is fake and nobody likes you
Get lost, kid
No.883105
>>883046
>you're being mean to my feelings how dare you your life is fake and nobody likes you
Are you having a stroke?
No.883209
>>882772
Are those asgardian rifles or are the bad guys just human-level durability
No.883344
>>883209
Earth spec weapons. Skurge is holding off the undead from Hel, so I'd wager, they blow apart pretty easily but they would keep coming back and attacking , which is why he gets overwhelmed in the end.
No.883390
>>879383
The Things inner tube is Ren, holy fuck my sides
No.883437
>>883296
Hellboy as a morlock, nice.
>>883299
Even Storm recognizes the failure of African society.
No.883466
No.886351
>>885029
Thanks for the storytime
No.895734
No.896185
>>895642
That's what made Shulkie's classic comics good.
No.896945
>>895634
Better than Gwenpool at 4th-walling
No.896948
>>895642
At least it was so bad it's good for meme source. Compared to current Marvel comics.
Except for Cap America's hail Hydra, that thing got meme'd to death.
No.902441
>>902427
>cover
Why do they have man faces?
No.904665
No.904879
>>904634
Keep up the work Anon.
No.906081
No.906172
No.906339
>>904630
Man, im starting to miss liefields art.
No.906926
>>906339
Liefeld didn't draw it
No.907325
No.909893
No.910353
>capeshit
>good
pick one and only one
No.910407
>>876893
>something's not kosher
>just said nigger in one their flagship coimcs
>kikes had long history of getting niggers on there side I know it didn't work, but ZOG is filled with morons
>this much of a God damn idiot
>reddit spacing bonus points
>shit grammar bonus points
No.914317
Everything here would make SJWs loose it.
No.918014
>>911880
>5th page
cheesecake
No.918147
>>898486
This version of the X-Men is infinitely superior to anything before or after it. I'll never understand why they got rid of characters like Gambit and Jubilee who were so much fun.
No.919408
>>914317
>SJWs
Why are you so obsessed about those irreverent faggots?
No.922086
No.925026
>>918147
Jim Lee Xmen is so nostalgic
No.925074
No.926858
>>919408
Because they are the reason Marvel is dying.
No.932016
No.932024
>>898488
>the emotion was so potent i could not entirely screen it out
Does Xavier get to experience every orgasm had when the mutants fuck at the academy?
No.932067
>>932024
Guy's gotta get his jollies somehow. Probably doesn't get laid much in that chair.
No.932288
No.932308
Katie was 5 in 1884, 5 and a half in 1989 and now uh… still in her preteens pre-teens as of 2017? Comic timelines are weird.
No.932311
>>932308
That means she's forever loli. Nice.
No.932312
>>932308
Err, 1984, not 1884.
Speaking of 1984 though, Julie was wearing a dress with nothing but panties under it, not shorts, when she first got her costume. Also Alex has somehow gained an undershirt and started putting on Julie's costume for some reason between two panels while Julie is putting on Alex's costume.
Minor art errors aside we come to the issue's gimmick: Pages in Elsewhere are sideways. The gimmick only get weirder past this.
No.932313
>>932312
The yellow kids are apparently based on a contemporary, for 1989, news paper comic. Later comics confirm Elsewhere looks different for each visitor with the implication is supposed to be that Elseworld as shown in this comic is colored by Katie watching way too many cartoons (see also, the opening credits page). Speaking of sliding timescale, this would require a lot of work to adapt to the modern day, especially in a different medium.
No.932314
>>932313
The issue takes more advantage of its prospective gimmick here.
No.932315
>>932314
The end. For such a weird issue it's actually quite an important one. The pockets of holding on Power Pack's costume's never appear again, though the ability to modify their costumes by putting a note in the pocket will show up several times.
No.932318
>>932313
For making this work as a cartoon, I think making Elsewhere 4:3 and have everything be drawn like a shoujo anime could work. Would likely need to add cuts to the real world done in 16:9 to stop the network from getting annoyed though.
No.932396
No.942847
No.943546
Thanksgiving, so fuck it, Thanksgiving comic!
No.943553
Now the only real problem I have with this issue: Doesn't Dagger have healing powers? Isn't one of the Morlocks a dude whoes entire power is healing? As much as I hate to compare something not shit to One More Day, this is a lot like One More Day.
No.943555
One of the best parts of Power Pack was that all the "special" crossover/event tie-in/holiday issues were actually important to the plot.
No.943560
Katie isn't even 6 and she's assembled a bunch of super humans on a whim. Latter she'll befriend Frank Castle. Katie really should have been leading the Avengers in MC2 instead of the bland undeveloped American Dream.
No.961979
>>898486
Omega Red is such wasted potencial,he became a joke as villain.
No.962114
>>932312
>>932313
I know this gets meme'd a lot, but they'd literally never get away with that today
No.962115
>>961979
I never even understood what he was all about until someone described him as the "russian captain america"
wolverine's villains are all kinda one-note and shitty
No.971994
>>943560
Self insert in all the places.
No.977217
>>925026
these colors are beauty.
No.977221
>>971994
is that pedo talk?
No.977222
>>925026
>posts art not drawn by jim lee
No.977223
>>918147
you only like jubilee because she's asian jailbait.
not that there's anything wrong with that.
No.988983
John Byrne create the best shulk looks,Cho is nice too.
No.989022
>>977223
jubilee hasnt been jailbait for like 20 years