>>1019293
>Why would you insert the word "sex" into your drawings like this. I really doubt it accomplishes anything, and it's not that clever or funny.
https://web.archive.org/web/20170211195405/https://www.slideshare.net/newestprod/subliminal-images-presentation
>1. Subliminal Images “Subliminal advertising is a technique of exposingconsumers to product pictures, brand names, or other marketing stimuli without the consumers having conscious awareness. Once exposed to a subliminal marketing stimulus, the consumer is believed todecode the information and act upon it without being able to acknowledge a communication stimulus.” James Vicary The originator of the term “subliminal advertising”
>2. Subliminal Images In 1957, James Vicary, a market researcher, claimed that patrons atEat Popcorn a movie theater in were shown two advertising messages, Eat Popcorn and Drink Coca-Cola, while they watched a film. The message was flashed for 3/1000 of a second once every five seconds, but the durationDrink Coca-Cola of the messages was so short that they were never consciously perceived by the viewers. Over the six-week test period the sales of popcorn rose 57% and the sales of Coca-Cola rose 18.1%.
>3. Subliminal Images In 1957, James Vicary, a market researcher, claimed that patrons atEat Popcorn a movie theater in were shown two advertising messages, Eat Popcorn and Drink Coca-Cola, while they watched a film. The message was flashed for 3/1000 of a second once every five seconds, but the durationDrink Coca-Cola of the messages was so short that they were never consciously perceived by the viewers. Over the six-week test period the sales of popcorn rose 57% and the sales of Coca-Cola rose 18.1%.
If it really didn't do anything, they wouldn't still do it, it's was just them messing around, it wouldn't be as prevalent across generations of artists. It's done to condition or mock you. If it was done once then it wouldn't have an effect one you, but if entire genres of mediums with the same repeating messages. It takes a lot of effort to move such a massive mind altering machine, and it can fail sometimes, as shown in the end of part 2 video.
Part one https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=Q-vJn5FJymo
Part two (this one focuses on sex) https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=yp8YaLlJfXk
>The continuous and far more obvious diversity propaganda has been a lot more damaging.
It's definitely blatant, there are many other agendas, and sects working mediums and other audiences/races to their plans, like black Greeks using hip hop to push prolonged adolescence and homosexuality.
>>1019317
>Shit like Disney's Star Wars failures, Hollywood's growing desperation and risk aversion, and Neflix's desperate throwing shit against the wall make me doubt that. American comics have been selling less and less every year based on the data available, and TV has been suffering losses too.
They're not completely invulnerable, we still have to choose to watch what they present on a silver platter, sometimes it's not about making money, like porn and doomed to fail movies, other times it's about subversion or sending a message. One example of this is the recent movie bomb billionaire boy's club. They don't need comics if they already have everyone on the internet, or watching super hero movies.