/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover★

>>63224 (OP)

What is this? An image for ants?

I feel like nothing good could come from searching the deep web for abdl.

>>63261

8 years old little girls wearing diapers and dressing like babies.

>>63277

I’ll stick with diapered loli so I don’t get v&

>>63280 (You)

And you know that pisses me off? I'm great believer of the rule 34. So there are probably some porn -- in a pretty high quality – of exactly this.

>>63280

The problem isn't what would be happening on the set, it's what would happen behind the scenes. But that's just a consequence of children being involved in photo or video shoots in general, so using children in any type of media should be illegal.

>>63289

I agree with that. I don't want anyone to get their life screwed just so that I could jerk off. So it should be illegal.

Although, if the photos/videos by some chance already exist and already were made…. I would probably jerk off to them.

hope photorealistic 3d technology advances though

>>63291

The world will be a dystopia hellhole when we reach the point of CGI being indistinguishable from reality because that means there is going to be a surge of politicians all over the world being blackmailed with fabricated photos and videos.

>>63292

>that means there is going to be a surge of politicians all over the world being blackmailed with fabricated photos and videos.

I disagree, I mean, once everybody knows that this technology is out there… photos and videos will lose all their value as proof of anything.

A video of some russian hookers pissing on Trump would have as much as value as someone writing this scene on a piece of paper.

>>63297

Okay then, that technology means that politicians will be completely immune to photographic/video blackmail. That's not really much better.

>facebook is surface web despite my aunt shared her 7yo kid sleeping in diaper and shirt on her profile

>>63280

I mean, I wont lie. That does sound super cute.

I want to say this up front. I dont want to harm kids. I dont want to stick my dick into a kid, or do anything that would generally be considered sexual to them. (I say generally considered sexual because how do you define something being sexual? what if someone finds making lunch for a kid sexual?) I dont even want to touch a kid in an inappropriate way.

That being said, the idea of looking after a kid in diapers, especially if they are on the older side, just kind of makes me feel… happy. Like kind of warm I guess. The same thing goes for hugging a kid or having a kid sit in my lap or something like that. I think it might be something to do with the trust they put in you. Like they trust you enough to hug you, or sit in your lap. Or they trust you enough so that when they need their diaper changed, they let you change them.

Now for me, and I imagine others here as well, there might be some somewhat sexual vibes coming off of the whole diaper experience because of our fetish. But I dont think this is coming from the kid, I think it is coming from the diapers. I mean, lets face it. A lot of us would find the idea of someone wearing diapers going about their day normally, and whenever they need to use the bathroom, they just go in their pants right then and their, whether they are walking around, sitting on the floor playing with legos, playing on a computer, reading a book, or sitting on your lap or sitting next to you watching a movie. To me, the idea of someone sitting on your lap during a movie just casually pooping their diaper without saying anything and then going back to watching the movie is highly sexual. The idea of a kid doing that is admittedly still exciting, but it feels more cute than sexual, and what sexual vibes are coming from it I think are from the diaper and action rather than the fact that it is a kid who doing it.

>>63289

>>63291

Yeah, I see where both of these are coming from. If we could be sure that the kids were not harmed behind the scenes, then it would be a lot more acceptable. The issue of the stuff already in existence also makes sense. If we could be sure that no new material would be created, I dont see what would be wrong with making existing stuff legal. The damage has already been done at that point.

>>63299

I agree with that. Although, at least if it leaks some nudes of you on the internet you could easily disregard them as fake… even though they are actually true 🤔

By god i know this is 8chan but i didnt realise that this board had so fucking many of the worst kind of degenerates

>>63280

>>63319

Wanting to see kids in diaper photoshoots isn't a big problem, since it can be easily solved by a shotgun slug to the brain

>>63280

I know what you mean.

Personally I just want to see a little girl enthusiastically wearing diapers and enjoying herself. Unfortunately only a tiny minority of kids would be into diapers/ageplay in the first place, and the whole CP scene is shady as fuck.

2D and CGI are the only real options for at least the next couple of centuries.

>>63319

>The damage has already been done at that point.

The one legitimate argument against that is privacy. I don't think people should be made to suffer as punishment for sharing CP, but it shouldn't be encouraged.

>>63343

The pictures you're uploading are not 3D kids, they're just kids. You're the kind of pedo that really gets under the skin, the kind who a) doesn't admit to be a pedo and b), is attracted to the kids' mind, where it's usually the biggest turn off for normal people. It's one thing to beat off to lolis, it's another to drool over kids being kids.

You're not going to find any sympathy here. We like the "cute" side because it's all part of roleplaying, women being cute while understanding the sexual aspect of it and being fine with that. Something you can never, ever say about kids. If you think most people here would be fine with a kid shitting their diaper on their laps, you are so fucking delusional it's a wonder you managed to survive this long.

Now if you'd please crawl back to whatever hole that would appreciate your company and stop uploading your own fap stash on several threads, that'd be cool. Though you'll probably throw a little tantrum about freedom of speech and keep spamming photos of actual, regular children, while pretending not to beat off to those. For shame, fag.

>>63345

>You're not going to find any sympathy here.

Speak for yourself. I have a great deal of sympathy for all pedophiles. It's not exactly an easy thing to live with, and anyone who can do so without causing harm should be commended.

>>63346

Yeah I'm ready to commend them with a baseball bat

These bunch of moral fags, go back to reddit.

>>63350

Are you even reading what you're typing?

If you honestly want to attack non-offending pedophiles with a baseball bat you're far more of a danger to society than any of them.

>>63352

I'm not a danger to society, I'm a danger to pedophiles. Specifically, the integrity of their skulls.

>>63345

>>63329

>>63331

Fuck off moralfags, I’m gonna go fap to >>63341 just to spite you. Go back to /pol/ if you want to moralfag like a boomer

>>63358

What's the name of that comic?

Oh shit, it's another one of those threads that's going to get me fucking arrested.

>>63385

don't forget to microwave your phone and hd

>>63301

The horror

>>63280

there is an image source from russia that you could look that up on, hypothetically.

>>63341

>>63349

what the heck were these?

>>63430

Completely innocent pictures of little girls, probably from a stock photo site or similar. None of them involved diaper, and the girls were fully clothed.

I'm not sure why they were deleted.

>>63437

Combatting the cancer of pedophile scum

>>63443

Fuck off, autist. The pictures were completely innocent

>>63437

Even if that was the case, I can't prove if it was or wasn't, pictures of any kind of child on a thread about adult-based content is risky at best. Regular ABDL's already have a hard time getting past the false pedophilic stigma. You fuckers ain't exactly helping our case. I understand cross-fetish material, but goddamn, you really need to just fuck off somewhere else.

>>63455

>you really need to just fuck off somewhere else.

We did. You followed us to the ass-end of the internet, remember. It's not like there's a shortage of normalfag ABDL sites out there.

Honest question: what do you find unsatisfactory about /r/ABDL and other similar sites?

>>63455

>Regular ABDL's already have a hard time getting past the false pedophilic stigma

Muh stigma. It's a fetish, who cares about its image. This isn't a "cause", it's something 99% of this board jacks off to and then goes back to their normal life. If you don't want to see pro-pedo remarks, go back to Reddit

>>63224 (OP)

abdl falls way off the grid when you go deep, like i used gigatribe MANY years ago and OH MY FUCKING GOD. like you can do a google search for sexy diaper girl (or woman) and get pics of kids in diapers, thats one thing. the dark web tho just goes atomic, i found images of shit that just should never happen, not to anyone or any where or any time, fucking ever! so what are you left with? if you choose to search deep you need to be willing to ignore the worst of humanity or dont go there.

as to anons post about wanting to see kids being babies i can kinda get where that thought comes from. when i was like 13 and getting into abdl i came across pics of older girls in diapers but not teens yet and i felt like man i wish i could have had that in my life when i was that age, the attention, fun of diapers, being THAT open in my life to embrace what i liked… (set was happygirl, im sure most have seen it). but thats emotional, its not sexual, i was not far off that age at the time and for what its worth it didnt look like anything untoward was going on in that.

having said this you just dont know, any time you involve someone who cant make the choice themselves you just cant be certian things are on the up and up, just becasue she is smiling dosent mean shit as the fat fuck who is making this shit is threatening to not feed her if she dosent do what he wants, taking away her life and child hood. there just shouldnt be a place for that type of shit online because someone will be victimized but just because we are looking at pixels some of us 'people' detach from humanity

>>63458

you're pro-pedo? What does that mean exactly?

>>63463

It means I’m not going to keyboard warrior over everything pedo-post

>>63456

Tumblr isn't organized. /r/ABDL is way to fucking tame nowadays. As well as the other reddit threads. 4chan is just a shit-show….not in the good way.

And of course I still visit those and others from time to time. 8chan isn't my mainstay either. But it sort of acts as a nice hub towards other content.

When I saw "ABDL deep web", of course I expected to see comments about kids and other more raunchy shit. Yeah…I expected it…but I still don't approve in the slightest.

>>63465

it doesn't seem like you care about actions that may harm others. The hard reconciliation is participating in fetishizing an otherwise innocent picture is contributing by creating an atmosphere where that is OK.

I think it's much cleaner to just leave real-life kids out of this in any way period.

>>63472

TBF, I'm pretty sure normalizing sexualizing children would be any pedophile's end goal. So yeah, he clearly doesn't give a fuck if other people like it or not.

>>63472

>>it doesn't seem like you care about actions that may harm others.

While I am not "ProPedo" I am anti thought crime

The idea that somebody will cause harm due to a thought or attraction is horrid in itself.

>>63475

I argue that consuming and seeking the behavior is implicit confirmation of the behavior.

It's not causing harm itself, but it is encouraging behavior that is harmful. That's the issue I have.

Honestly very similar to my thoughts on the nfl.

>>63476

*I argue that consuming and seeking the media is implicit confirmation of the behavior.

sorry I wasn't paying attention

>>63475

>>63475

i dont think it can be classified as just a thought crime.

take a picture of a kid in a diaper in normal life that has been snatched from fb or what ever. people viewing that for sexual pleasure crosses so many normal boundires its hard to even list them. yet some people just disreguard or dont think about that, people are only people in person, not in pixels it seems.

if we talk about a "photo set" of a girl, teen, kid, whatever she now has her pictures out there forever, if or when she finds out about this she will forever have that thought in her mind, anyone she meets COULD possibly have seen those pictures.

maybe the argument can be a bit grayer when it comes to teens as some areas of the world have lower concent laws and in general its hit or miss if someone in high school is mature enough one moment to the next to understand what they are deciding to do.

either way however we are talking about pictures and videos that are not coming from some chick in her bedroom at her moms middle class home in Virgina… we are talking about production studios in countries like the ukraine, russia, various other countries that are very lax on how they protect the rights of others.

saying 'to each their own' or just let it be is learned indifference to morality and the lives of others.

>>63475

also: I'm not saying it is a crime or anything but something our community should discourage on moral grounds.

>>63479

Oh, you just had to use the "M" word, didn't you? Pedo's don't take that word seriously.

>>63470

4chan deletes images that are taken from premium sources

>>63461

this.

Easy solution, you can no longer have bad thoughts after I've bashed your skull in.

You can get off to a 12 years old wearing a diaper but you don't, why?

>>63478

Is the amount of harm that occurs in a large white market greater than the amount of harm that occurs in a small black market?

>>63472

>it doesn't seem like you care about actions that may harm others. The hard reconciliation is participating in fetishizing an otherwise innocent picture is contributing by creating an atmosphere where that is OK.

There’s nothing wrong with fetishizing a pic that wasn’t created to be fetishized. People do it all the time.

>I think it's much cleaner to just leave real-life kids out of this in any way period

I mean of course I’m against worth people into doing things against their will (exploiting children) but the fact still stands that I would find a twelve year old girl in a diaper very attractive. I wouldn’t pursue it in real life but I’m sure as hell going to fantasize about it.

>>63510

Yeah if you're jerking off to kids you are a pedophile. While the material may not be inherently pornographic, you are using it as such and it contains children.

Kids play around and do stuff innocently, it's disgusting oxygen thieving pedos that distort and prey upon on that innocence.

>>63526

If somebody has been interested in other children wearing diapers ever since they were a child, when exactly does that person become a pedo?

>>63527

well it would depend, if it is preadolecent i would say its always pedo. if you were a teen and got into teens at that age then id call that normal in your reguard BUT the way most all of that content is made is enheraently victimizing to the girls/boys in the pics/videos.

as you grow up you would become a herbaphelia (i didnt google spelling of this), and then if you go down in age from there it becomes pedo. once you clear the boundry into adult hood (after high school ish) then it becomes abnormal to want to find sexual content of anyone under 18. not abnormal to notice how attractive a teenager is but to take that further is crossing boundries of power/social status/legality and so on.

>>63527

You're biologically supposed to grow out of it and find the same age as yourself attractive you dumbfuck

You're an abnormal mutation and need to be culled

>>63537

And you're suppose to grow out of being an edgy teenager. One day, hopefully, you will learn that being angry at somebody doesn't mean you know about every aspect of that person's life.

>>63537

>You're an abnormal mutation and need to be culled

[citation needed]

Your morals do not exist

>>63343

I don't give a shit if you jerk off to 2D loli 2 year olds or whatever, that's fine and acceptable. The MINUTE you involve real children either in pictures, videos or actually fucking a child, you only deserve the rope or the bullet. you're subhuman scum.

I know, I know, you'll cry "OMFG, you're moralfagging!" Or "Just because I look at real children, doesn't mean I'll act on it" or my favorites "I'm actually a hebaphile" and "Actually, I'm minor attracted, stop discriminating against me!" It doesn't matter, you're subhuman scum and need to be holocausted. If a Hitler like persona came along and advocated for your kind to be gassed, I'd support it and stomp your worthless ass into the ground.

And before you go off on the usual "Hurr, u mad bro?" bullshit, no I'm not mad. I say you should be gassed with no anger in my voice. Subhumans are just simply subhuman.

>>63547

Why would you care about real kids anyways? they die daily in 3rd world countries and no one really gives a shit anymore

>>63562

I mean, isn't being raped and then killed by some random old man worse than just dying of hunger or a drone strike anyways?

>>63728

>getting blown to pieces by imperialist drone strikes or dying slowly from no food is better than getting raped and then killed

Lol tbh

>>63728

Death is one. all of them are gonna die in each scenario, no one really cares except if it's in the u.s or a first world country, well that's what i believe. I don't care either way. Anyways fapping to some diapered 12 years olds isn't gonna kill them. so… can we stop giving a shit about moralfaggotry as long as the thing doesn't kill anyone?

Does anyone remember YIOR or YOIR? not sure what it was called.

That was one of the first abdl communities I joined when I was like 12, members where able to upload photos and there was a lot of diaper cp. When I found that out I stopped using the site. weirdly enough no one asked me for pics.

I think the site admin got arrested by the police, shortly after that the site was deleted.

>>63776

YIOR the cobb. Yea, i remember that shithole.

the owner ended up getting arrested, and so did some lady who was taking pics of her kids wearing diapers and selling them to him to post.

https://www.mothering.com/forum/221-diapering/522422-brian-cobb-arrested.html

>>63776

He used to recruit off the dpf teen room. He started chatting me up, and in hindsight grooming me, like a week before his arrest and take down.

The pedos in this thread need the rope. Art is one one, but any involvement of actual kids is fucked up. You are worthless dum, kill yourself

>>63776

>>63776

yea he took that shit to a whole nother level, he wasnt just googling pictures and cross personal boundires. he was activly finding people who other wise wouldnt have been involved and wouldn't have had their pictures online. i went to that site back when i was like 17/18 as i thought it was another abdl community. i remembr finding some pretty cute looking girls on there who i think were from darsy (or something like that) in pullups/pampers, looked like chicks i went to school with. but it wasnt long before i found just a shit load of really little kids and i kinda shyed away from the site. looking back i viewed the high school girls on there as willing participants but now that im older… i wounder how many of those girls knew their pictures were being downloaded and giving a bunch of guys their jollys. even more how many of them had a normal life or were now permanently jaded by the sex world…

at the time i had just ignored what i had seen but i didnt do anything to bring attention to his site, to tell people there was some fuck positing pictures and videos of little kids and because i used that site and downloaded some of the older girls i helped perpetuate the spread of the shit on there.

i think it was a few years after that i read that he was arrested.

>>63800

>because i used that site and downloaded some of the older girls

This is why people need more awareness of why porn is bad. Everybody lets themselves get addicted because they don't understand the consequences, and as a result, they turn a blind eye to the bad shit they see as they fall down the rabbit hole.

Parents also need to stop being stupid when dealing with children who show a curiosity for diapers and/or babyish things. If they acted like good parents, these children wouldn't feel the need to seek support from shady online sources where they can fall prey to perverts.

>>63801

Funny guy. You laughed when the migrant kid's drowned corpse washed up on the Mediterranean sea, and now you act all high and mighty as if you gave a fuck about human values? As if you were any less deserving of swift and brutal execution by shotgun blast to the face than the rest of the breathing garbage in this thread?

>>63807

>being THIS MUCH of a brainwashed normie

dude, stick to /pol/, I ain't posting my collection of murdered white South African children on /abdl/

>>63358

I used to have this fantasy about the daughter of one of my Dad’s girlfriends. I was under 18 too so we were pretty close in age. I had this whole elaborate fantasy concocted about slipping into her room while she was sleeping and putting her hand in a bowl of water to make her wet the bed, until it happened so many times she would have to start wearing diapers to bed (I was influenced by lots of cringe level stories I read online.)

It never happened, but one time her Mom babysat a younger cousin when she was like 11 and she put on one of her pull-ups as a joke. She showed me a video she had on her phone of her shaking her butt around going “I’m wearing a diaper, I’m wearing a diaper.” I thought about trying to get her to text it to me but I didn’t want to be a creep or have it on my phone.

>>64549

I fap to preteens and teen wearing diapers.. and you can do nothing about it

>>64552

We don't NEED to do anything about it since you're going to burn in hell anyway (and you deserve it too).

>>63800

>because i used that site and downloaded some of the older girls i helped perpetuate the spread of the shit on there.

Unless there were adverts on the site, you didn't help to perpetuate it in any way.

Humans aren't telepathic, so simply viewing an image doesn't cause any harm.

>>64552

If teens work for you why not fap to people just of age so you’re not temped to commit perverted atrocities to kids?

>>64570

I do both. it depends on my mood. I have not molested anyone. i just fapped to the picture on my screen of diapered preteens and teens.

>>64557

>burn in hell

>moralfag

probably all of us are going there. just because it's a thing that you hate, it doesn't mean shit.

>>63800

Actually, the administrator of the site was known for years, but the police couldn't do anything about it, because it was legal. A guy tracked down two of the girls, sisters, but even then it wasn't a sure bet anyone would go to jail. The guy who organized the photoshoot with the two girls was the mastermind behind the operation, not the admin. It wasn't until a Dane got involved the DA could get the case together. The Dane told the DA the diaper thing was breaking down the identity of the child, as toilet training is central to psycho babble, and to ask a very simple question; get a nurse to describe in detail the steps and movements involved in changing a diaper.

I dont remember who each person was, but I remember the first guy was an AB turned Christian, and that the Dane said he worked with him on documenting a few sites and tried to track down a producer, but in the end, he said the methods used were too creepy, and he dropped off the radar.

The admin got off with a warning, or something, because he is too autistic to understand what he was doing.