/abdl/ - Adult Baby - Diaper Lover★

And yes, I know I'm deceiving people etc but I won't make it anything sexual. I'm going to (try to) behave exactly as they would expect me to.

I'm sure someone did this before on this site by posting on craiglists but chickened out after doing it once or twice

http://gawker.com/5823498/man-who-pretended-to-be-autistic-to-have-his-diapers-changed-sent-to-jail

Yes they have

Yeah, that guy obviously went way too far, didn't know his limits, was a bit fucked in the head, etc.

I reckon if I just keep up the act don't do anything outrageous, I should be fine.

>>60091

famous last words

Let it be known that none of us ugly basement dwellers will attend your trial/funeral.

I would advice you to not do this if real. You are asking for trouble.

This is a good reminder of how crazy this can make me.

It has been done. And people have gone to jail for it.

Look, straight talk here. Even if you get away with it the first time. That means you'll keeo trying. Then it doesn't become a matter of if you'll be caught, but when. Even if you don't go to prison, you'll have your name forever be searchable that you did this.

It is not worth the risk. Save your damn shekels and hire a kink friendly prostitute who will do everything and more. Compared to what some guys want, changing your poopy diaper and treating you like a kid is a cakewalk.

>>60086 (OP)

OP is a fucking nutjob i only come to this place for the free porn 75% of this board is seriously deranged and fueling the stigma around ABDL, OP neck yourself

>>60086 (OP)

i truly hope this is fake. don't do it

>>60091

> [that guy] was a bit fucked in head….

> I should be fine

> Thinks he isn't fucked in the head

> Is trying to deceive women into changing his very used diapers by pretending to be retarded

no don't

>>60089

>>60090

>>60094

>>60104

>>60105

>>60113

>>60114

>>60115

>>60118

>>60120

Let it be known op that besides me that the other posters behind these 9 ids are trying to warn you in some way, shape, or form that your idea is a bad one.

You have 10 other people telling you not to do this.

If you have any sense at all please take our warning serious.

At best, you'll be making the transition to becoming criminally perverse. If you're seriously entertaining this, you deserve everything wicked that this life has to offer.

>>60120

Not only that, but what does he think is going to happen when nobody shows up to pick up the retarded kid? Even if she's been dumb enough to believe everything else so far, she's gonna call the cops to get them to figure out what happened to them. And then the cops are going to investigate and figure out that OP is full of shit.

>>60086 (OP)

Then what, you actual fucking retard? You suddenly drop the retard act and drive home? What happens when nobody picks "him" up? Even if she doesn't smell a rat when you're sperging out, a good caregiver is going to wonder where the fuck your "parents" etc. are.

For that matter, what, are you going to take an Uber over there? That's a red flag that even another retard could spot.

That said I look forward to seeing your Chris Chan crustache triple chin stained with tears and vomit in your mugshot. Make it a good one, champ.

>>60133

Hey. How do you find a mommy? Serious. Might be off topic. But going on omegle and typing in "ABDL" doesn't seem to help me as it's pretty much one and done and the girl disconnects. I hate that shit

>>60134

craiglists if you want to risk meeting creeps.I have no other ideas, but I also don't play into the AB stuff and never wanted a 'mommy' I wish I could help you more. Anything is better than OP's "master plan"

>>60086 (OP)

The fact you felt like posting this plan on the internet is probably evidence that you are retarded. Please save this as evidence for when you are taken to court.

>>60086 (OP)

I hope for your own sake you're trolling OP.

A) op do not to it for the love of all that is good and holy in this world…. Or whatever is left of it.

B) if you looking for a mommy or other fetish related relationship fetlife is likely your best bet. Fewer creepers than Craigslist

>>60086 (OP)

I get how you feel OP. It sucks to not being able to carry out our fantasies, to have someone who's into this fetish but as a mommy/daddy. It really sucks, I personally wish I had a big and strong mommy to change my diapers and give me the proper treatment when I misbehave.

This is by I ask you to please dont do this. It's not only dangerous because of the legal implications, but also unfair with the babbysitter. She's not into this the way you are, and certainly isn't going to asume your retardation is qt or adorable in any way. She's going to be very aware of any sort of out of place behavior you exihibit, and idk how you will react if she goes full angry when you are on the couch with a filthy diaper. Just imagine how submissive and vulnerable you will feel if she begin to pressure you to spill the beans about your apparent retardation. Will you keep you facade? What about when no parents show to explain her why their child needs to be taken care of? This is a quite strange situation, and any sensible parent would explain in person such a complicated matter to the person they're about to trust to take care of their retarded son.

I know I cant appeal to your moral compass, maybe you do have one but dont care about doing such a thing like this. But at least I know I can appeal to how flawed your story is. This "masterplan" of yours is set to fail. Only a miracle would save you from getting jailed, and if you by some chance convince her that all of this it's actually true, what if she decides afterwards to take legal actions? She has all the evidence on her side, and I doubt you will stick to your retarded persona for as long as the next months in case the cops come to your home asking for the retarded child she toon care off.

Please op, do t do it.

Never before have I seen a thread on /abdl/ get so many responses so swiftly.

Please let this be a sign OP. If you get caught, the consequences could be far worse than you're prepared for.

DO NOT EVER DO THIS, DO NOT DO THIS, THIS IS THE MOST RETARDED THING????

on a more serious matter, by doing this, you are removing consent from the 'babysitter' and commiting a crime, because you are using this for your sexual gratification.

You are slime if you do this

Did it work?

>>60134

by not being a disgusting autist. I know, that's asking a lot for men in the abdl scene.

Someone had this exact plan, posted it here a while back, was found out and arrested. For your own sake, and the sake of any poor person you want to deceive, I hope you don't mind any charges being pressed.

Or just don't do it. You fucking moron.

You should totally do it. Best case scenario you look retarded and go home. Worst case scenario your life is fucked. 11/10 plan OP, great job.

>>60131

This. There is no possible way this plan can go remotely well.

OP, I don't think you deserve to suffer - in an ideal world you'd be able to live out your fantasies without suffering any negative consequences - but this is an immensely bad idea. If you're dumb enough to come up with a plan this terrible, you're definitely too dumb to talk your way out of it when the shit hits the fan.

>>60091

You're a bit fucked in the head yourself for considering this. This is prison time you're risking.

I honestly hope you get caught.

Did OP do it anyway?

the only way the OP did this is if he's as retarded as he would pretend to be.

beyond the legality issues surrounding it.

devils advocate: you go through with it

What happens At the end of shift, No babysitter worth her salt would leave there charge alone Especially one that was mentally retarded.

So what do they start trying to get phone numbers out of you?

Start asking the local neighbors?

Do you have A friend come home to be your parent?

on top of that do you think you can convincingly act retarded without breaking character the whole time, acting is tough

>>60184

>on top of that do you think you can convincingly act retarded without breaking character the whole time, acting is tough

I don't know about that. OP seems to be pretty good at acting like a retard if this thread is any indication.

You're an idiot, OP. This is a horrible idea.

That said, go for it. I look forward to seeing your mugshot.

Ended up not going through with it because the babysitter I was going to do with it was asking for too much money. Maybe another time, though.

>>60191

Yeah you definitely don't need to pretend that your "son" is the retarded one

>>60191

glad you didn't do it. but don't even consider another time.

if you're willing to pay hire a prostitute at least there is consent.

If the morality of it all is not enough:

if you do this to an unwilling participant its probably jail but certainly list of sex offenders …

If you do decide to subject your fetishes to an unwilling participant in such a way you deserve whatever is going to happen to you.

>>60191

The fact that she was asking for too much money being the thing that stopped you makes me kek so hard.

Kys

>>60086 (OP)

Fake and gay b8

sign up on AdultWork and look for someone that does Adult Baby minding in your area.

then there will be the need to provide payment and negotiate what you want up front.

if a 'babysitter' is too expensive then I suppose good luck with that.

Agreed, OP's idea is fucking retarded and probably fake. But I do get turned on by being treated as though I'm disabled. Disability workers and personal attendants for the handicapped make fuck all (often only slightly above minimum wage). I would love to negotiate a deal with a "real" caregiver to take care of me as though I'm retarded (diaper, etc). Same job they normally do, but I'd happily pay three times their normal salary. Nothing illegal about it as long as you're up-front and there's no sexual touching. And it would still be way cheaper than hiring a dominatrix, who probably wouldn't understand what I wanted anyway. It's too bad there's no easy way to connect with a kink-friendly caregiver who needs some extra cash.

what happens when you get an errection every time she puts you in a diaper you creep?

Forcing people to participate in your fetish unwittingly is disgusting. I for once completely understand the creepy stigma ABDL has because we have sick fucks like you in the lifestyle.

I hope you do go through with it so you are:

1) sent to prison where you will never be able to wear diapers

2) Your entire city knows you as the diaper pedophile

3) You are never allowed within 5,000 ft of a playground

4) You will never be able to do this again its a one time only thing

5) You get raped in prison

6) Your parents disown you

7) This poor women gets to sue the shit out of you and every paycheck you make 60% of it goes directly to her bank the rest of your miserable existence.

Don't listen to all these rationale people telling you not to do it PLEASE DO IT!! Dont be a pussy.

our community: weirdos and warriors.

>>60222

>>60222 This guy isn't just a weirdo, he's a complete sociopathic cunt.

Nevermind the blatant stupidity of the details, as its core, the plan is to trick this poor woman into getting him off. It's just such a fucking rapey thing to do. Even if he's not physically forcing anyone, he's gonna lure someone into a sexual act without their consent.

I've seen shit like this spawn for years in this community. And it's whenever I begin to wonder why I'm so ashamed to have this fetish that I see something like this.

>>60226

God I hate this about the era. The only things that's "rapey" is forcibly sticking your penis in a woman's vagina.

Everything else is evil, and assault, but don't diminish rape. Talk to one rape victim and she'd be like "yeah, weirdo tricking me into changing his diapers would suck… but that ain't rape"

>>60233

>The only things that's "rapey" is forcibly sticking your penis in a woman's vagina.

But the mouth/ass, that's fine.

If anything, you can appreciate that this thread, fake or not, and as autistic as it may be, reveals how truly fucked some people are. You're the one diminishing rape by saying "it's only that" when everyone but you has accepted that rape = sexual assault of any kind. And trying to put up some sort of ranking of "what rape is worse than the other" is mind-boggling.

But yeah, it's all about the era, say the people who apparently never had to deal with any real issue.

>>60191

Well you had us going for a little bit…kinda of.

>>60233

That's why i said "rapey" not rape. Cause you're right. But it is rape-y. Just like drugging someone's drink even if you never touch them is very rape-y

>>60086 (OP)

This is not a novel idea. In fact, there are a ton of semi-obscure news articles documenting how this plays out. Spoiler: manipulating people to change your diaper under false pretenses is fraud, and could result in a prison sentence.

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2009-09-11/news/0909100132_1_kelly-brevard-disabled

http://www.unionleader.com/article/20121025/NEWS03/710259914

https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/Dirty-Diaper-Faker-Pleads-Guilty-100360844.html

>>60234

When the difference between consent and rape comes down to the thoughts within the perpetrator's mind, it definitely does diminish rape. It's arguably even worse than women saying they were raped because their partner lied about being a millionaire.

If someone did what OP's suggesting for non-sexual reasons, say as part of a way to claim disability benefits, it would be unethical but nobody would suggest it was rape. You're claiming that it's rape purely because of OP's mental state at the time. Doesn't that concern you at all?

>>60234

What >>60264 guy said.

Look. Sexual assault is seriously bad. Rape is utterly evil. Rape is one of the oldest, most heinous crimes.

By expanding what "Rape" means, you diminish the hardness of the term. You're trying to make everyone take sexual assault more seriously, I get that, but there's leagues difference between some f@#ker in a trenchcoat exposing his genitalia and a dude beating up a woman and forcibly sticking his penis in her vagina.

The harm those two acts cause is vastly different. By suggesting both are "rape" you will not get the average person to hate indecent exposure that much more, but when you say "rape" they'll think, "Well, maybe it wasn't that bad, sometimes rape is just showing someone your dick"

And that's exactly what we shouldn't want to happen.

>>60266

>but there's leagues difference between some f@#ker in a trenchcoat exposing his genitalia and a dude beating up a woman and forcibly sticking his penis in her vagina.

I hope you're not using that line to comfort the victim… The law will treat it differently, the sentence will be different, the victim still didn't deserve any of that. As if you would go to a victim of indecent exposure and be like "cheer up, it could be worse, people die all the time". As if that would erase the thought of crazy dudes jumping in front of you to expose themselves as soon as you set foot outside your place.

Trauma is not measured by logic… I hope you understand that.

>The harm those two acts cause is vastly different.

So what? Is it better to get beaten up because you know you can be murdered instead?

Again, you leave that kind of reasoning to the justice system to decide how heavy the punishment should be; not to make distinctions between sexual assaults. That is really not how it works.

In fact, most countries treat rape and attempt to rape the same way. They don't care how much (physical) harm, if any, was done, because it's not what it's about.

>By suggesting both are "rape" you will not get the average person to hate indecent exposure that much more, but when you say "rape" they'll think, "Well, maybe it wasn't that bad, sometimes rape is just showing someone your dick"

Then rest easy knowing only weirdos would think like that… People don't rate and classify the rapes, they just don't. In fact a pseudo-scientist tried to do it a while back, and everyone vomitted on him for doing so.

Bottom line is, OP is a moron with a plan that would make him a sex offender if he goes through with it, and should be judged as such. There's no conspiracy to get "benefits" here, it's very clearly sexual.

No one cares about semantics or wether this constitutes rape according to the textbook definition or not… Nor does anyone think "hey it could be worse for the babysitter". All you need to do is scroll up to see a lot of people saying to take into consideration HER point of view, and none of them have a lighter, less dramatic idea of what rape is because of this.

>>60270

>is it better to get beaten up because you know you can be murdered instead

Not that guy, but this has nothing to do with what is better or worse. We have distinctions in the English language for a reason. If people started talking to me about how they were murdered the other week when they were in fact referring to how they were beaten up it would be confusing as fuck. Neither of those things is a good thing to have happen to you, but when it comes to communicating with other people language matters.

>leave that kind of reasoning to the justice system to decide how heavy the punishment should be

>not to make distinctions between sexual assaults

>that is really not how it works

This is absolute lunacy. It really is how this works. The Justice system is not some nebulous entity which exists outside of human thought. We created it in a way that makes sense to us, not the other way around.

Defining the difference between assault and murder isn't just for the super special court room setting. We live in a world that is complex and we need to be able to effectively communicate with each other using sentences more complicated than "A bad thing happened to me".

OP is probably trolling, but either way he is a creepy weirdo and thankfully we are able to talk about why that is without simply calling him a rapist and walking away. Talking about complex nuanced issues is an absolutely normal, everyday human activity and this is a good thing.

>>60086 (OP)

Please do it. We'll be watching the news for you.

>>60213

If you go with the hiring an HHA, PCA, CNA to take care of you after agreeing to not be sexual, they’ll be totally fine with it.

They have to deal with that shit all the time. Old guys get horny and desperate when they’re at the end of their life. Always get erections and talk filthy to them telling them how they want to fuck them, then turning mean and saying degrading ass shit to them. Then there’s the Alzheimer’s cases that sit in their diarrhea and jack off while covered in shit, who they then have to forcibly sponge bathe while they try to claw at their eyes and punch them while still covered in shit.

And that’s a normal day in the nursing home. The girls are 16 and up, normally pretty cute and make $10-11 an hour unless they’ve been at the place for 5 years or more, then sometimes they get closer to $13-$15.

You could totally convince one to help you out for an hour or two every once in awhile if you promise not to be a rapist/murderer. Even if you’re fuck ugly most of the people they take care of are worse.

>>60244

>http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2009-09-11/news/0909100132_1_kelly-brevard-disabled

Saw this on WFTV when it happened. My first reaction: what a stupid asshole!

>>60226

>I've seen shit like this spawn for years in this community. And it's whenever I begin to wonder why I'm so ashamed to have this fetish that I see something like this.

you really shouldn't be..

i mean i've dealt with some weird guys before but most people are really nice

Everytime I think I'm a fucked up sexual deviant the Internet reminds me that I'm not that far gone. I'll be looking for the story on your arrest, OP

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/bizarre/dirty-diaper-ruse-265938#lightbox-popup-1

Found OP

@ c64b73 that can't be OP because that guy started in May. If that was OP, he'd have bragged about how he was *already* deceiving some poor caregiver. People like OP and all the linked articles are why this fetish is seen as creepy. IOW this is why we can't have nice things.

>>64864

>IOW this is why we can't have nice things.

It seems that any "nice things" we could receive would immediately get us branded as creeps if we took advantage of them.

A lot of people seem to have this weird notion that if it weren't for creeps exposing their fetish publicly, society would tolerate us exposing our fetish publicly.

The truth is that people like OP don't really hurt the public image of ABDLs because everything we do is inherently creepy and socially unacceptable. The idea of us achieving any kind of positive public image is pure fantasy.

>>64865

It's a chicken-or-egg thing. Is ABDL really inherently creepy, and things like these weirdos just confirm it, or is ABDL generally viewed as creepy because the primary impression held by the public is set by these extreme weirdos because most of us are very private about our interest in ABDL?

>>64866

Neither. People who view ABDL as creepy are just bigots. The caretakers escalating things instead of just doing their job like they happily would for others were the ones at fault.

>>64867

"Escalation" in this case meaning "checked with the patient's parents after becoming suspicious, likely due to the patient demanding extra attention to his aroused genitals during cleanings, and unusual discipline requirements". The caregiver was instructed to punish the "patient" for using the diapers he supposedly required 24/7.

>>64864

I saw the article and was reminded of this thread; guess I didn't really think about it too much. In any case, if OP is still thinking about doing this I sincerely hope he reconsiders. It's a felony offense we're talking about.

>>64866

Almost everyone considers diapers disgusting. Even without any negative media attention we're about on the level of scat fetishists in the public eye. The whole "adult men pretending to be babies" thing is like something out of a very weird horror movie or gross-out comedy.

Ours is one of the few fetishes which elicit an almost universally negative reaction even on places like /a/ and /d/.

>>64872

People who react negatively to diapers on /a/ tend to be obvious crossboarders with 3DPD reaction images and underage-tier grammar, though.

>>64872

But how much of that is due to idiots like the guy in the smoking gun article, the other linked articles, the OP, and excruciatingly cringey fetish segments on Springer et al depicting balding overweight men in their 50s wearing oversized baby bonnets and sitting in playpens? If the face of ABDL was younger, more attractive, and depicted as living otherwise-normal lives, do you think the general perception would still be so negative?

>>64876

Diapers are generally associated with shit and piss. Nothing is ever going to make that socially acceptable.

>>64876

So negative? Maybe not. But I think the image is justly negative, those overweight, late middle-aged men make up the majority of our fetish. Perhaps not as vast a majority as perceived but still.

People are always going to be disgusted by purposeful immaturity and piss and shit play. Diapers encompass both the psychological ewww and the physical ewww.

I like em' but I'm well aware how the average person percieves them.

http://thesmokinggun.com/documents/bizarre/dirty-diaper-ruse-265938

Is this you??!?!?!!!

>>64866

I mean it is viewed as weird but this person isn't representative of anything. There's sickos into everything (or nothing). We're just not talking about all the flashers, rapists, etc. in the world. Turns out there's not nearly as many news reports about the dude into diapers who didn't do anything illegal and didn't bother anyone or flaunt it.

>>64905 Saw that this morning and wondered the same thing. If so rip OP

I really hope that isn't op.

31 years old is a bad time to have your life thrown away.

>>64927

I dont think you could pass 19 as 31.

>>64935

Dumbass tried… maybe? Or maybe he changed one fact so it wouldn't be an admission on here? I mean, I'd use the defense that, actually, he has to be retarded to try this stunt and, therefore, no fraud was actually committed.

Why take such a huge risk "pretending" to be retarded?

I've gotten three or four different women to babysit me from craigslist by being honest.

There are plenty of single moms out there who have changed enough diapers to not give a fuck about doing it, even on an adult and will gladly take care of you.

If I make a post on the domestic gigs section of craigslist, I get like 10 replies within a couple of days. Think about it….what is someone going to make babysitting an actual child? Maybe 15 an hour if they're lucky? I offer 25 an hour. On top of that it's easier work. Real kids, especially toddlers, basically do something that could kill themselves within 5 minutes of you taking your eye off them. Obviously I'm going to drink bleach if whoever I'm paying wants to go outside for a cigarette or needs to take a shit.

The only thing I lie about is I say I wear 24/7 and have been for years so I've lost all control in that time. Adds to the excitement for me. They know it's a fetish, but they also think I really need the diapers at this point.

Obviously a bad idea http://www.azfamily.com/story/39087173/pd-gilbert-man-30-duped-caregivers-into-changing-his-diapers-giving-him-baths

>>65164

Just by sheer coincidence, could that have possibly been OP? Doubts, but it would be really fucking funny if it was.

>>64972

I’m legitimately wondering how you worded it. I can’t imagine a way someone could post an ad like that, without seeming creepy beyond all belief.

>>64972

Did any of them watch while you made cummies?

>>65293

seconding this

>>64872

I have never had anyone actually react negatively to me wearing diapers, regardless of whether they know the real reason or not. Worst I have gotten is a laugh or two.

As long as you don't mess in public, it's mostly just considered weird.

In other news, I was delighted to see that the best and most trusted news source on the Intertubes has written about this incident: https://dailystormer.name/man-fakes-downs-syndrome-to-get-special-treatment-from-fugly-nurses/

Note that even DS doesn't have an issue with the diapers… only with the guy being a spic :D

>>64874

This.

/a/nons are known for many things, but being judgamental isnt one them. That's why so many trannies browse the place.

t. Tranny with a diaper fetish (what a shock)

>>65323

That has to be the shittiest article I've ever read in my life. Does anyone still bother getting some kind of education before pretending to be able to do a job?

>>65291

OP was defending himself pretty hard before and is now totally silent.

It may be a coincidence, but odds seem unfortunately likely the dumbfuck didn't listen to any of us.

>>65388

What do you think the Daily Stormer is, exactly?

Or are you complaining about the article it's referencing?