[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/monarchy/ - STOP THINKING LIKE REPUBLICANS

They're just LARPing, right?...right???

Catalog  Archive

Name
Email
Subject*
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload4 per post.


IN CASE 8CHAN IS DOWN: http://txti.es/monarchy FOR NEWS ABOUT WHERE TO REGROUP

File: 16f28daba119442⋯.jpg (23.99 KB,770x437,770:437,hydra-animal-immortal-live….jpg)

 No.3173 [Open thread]

With genetic engineering immortality is within our grasp. Would an eternal monarch be better than mortal monarch who die and are replaced? It could be argued that changing rulers leads to instability.

5 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3658

File: 7e45d29de9490ac⋯.jpg (347.24 KB,500x1000,1:2,ungern sternberg.jpg)

>>3656

The Constitution isn't an AI. It's a piece of animal skin. There's a difference between basing a government on a fashionable demotic political ideology and building a perfect monarch bereft of human foibles or mortality.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3662

File: 83046295d34951c⋯.png (259.73 KB,706x653,706:653,aya cringe compilation.png)

>>3656

>Only a person can intimately rule and this is the best you can really wish for… the absolute ruler… the leviathan… mortal god… above law and law-maker… the sovereign.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3676

File: 06e45e4cf8100a1⋯.jpg (108.16 KB,1181x897,1181:897,working_class_scum.jpg)

>>3662

Post normalfag cancer again, and I'll beat you with my cane.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3803

Someone will bring up Mr. House soon or later.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3818

>>3803

I think you just did.

>>3173

It sounds like the logical conclusion of monarchy to me. The prime advantage of a monarch over other forms of rule is that a monarch has lower time preference, and is more willing to forego gaining wealth now in favor of getting even more wealth in the future. Removing mortality from the equation will bring time preference asymptotically close to zero, allowing the monarch to think on a scale of decades or even centuries.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 1435690268361.jpg (49.51 KB,577x423,577:423,Lorrain.seaport.jpg)

 No.236 [Open thread]

What does /monarchy/ think of mercantilism as an economic policy?

35 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2579

>>2578

What is the ->Kingdom<- of David?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2581

>>2579

The exception to a rule.

And Israel split in half after that, for all I know. They demanded a king and got a king.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2582

You see, Jews needed the Kingdom of God and the SPIRIT, as they could not survive on behalf of the LAW.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3650

>>332

>economic growth

Can't have indefinite economic growth.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3817

>>3650

You're half right. Presuming you have sound monetary policy, and not Keynesian fiat shit, indefinite economic growth is not necessary for a functional economy. However, insofar as the economic growth is legitimate, it's certainly desirable, as it's driven by technological growth and will only increase the standard of living of your subjects. In answer to OP, this guy >>710 gets it right, comparative advantage is best.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: b834803b8431ad0⋯.png (461.57 KB,703x673,703:673,703px-Imperial_Coat_of_Arm….png)

File: 55f98796efbbfd6⋯.jpg (211.25 KB,800x1015,160:203,8647d9fac5c39f5a36584ad735….jpg)

File: d61b70f46d8e147⋯.png (187.81 KB,250x317,250:317,250px-NaderShahPainting.png)

 No.3694 [Open thread]

2500 years down the drain, in recent living memory. What went wrong? Could it have gone right? What does /monarchy/ think about Iranian monarchy? For me, it's gotta be Nader Shah.

28 posts and 24 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3761

File: 18939008bd60556⋯.jpg (58.02 KB,450x635,90:127,DUswdkZX4AE2Nlh.jpg)

>>3760

>Explain the 1953 coup

Don't care, tbh. Yes, the Americans did help and bolster him. It just isn't stealing if you're taking back what's rightfully yours. And also, he is a monarch so it isn't exactly the American ideal either way. It's not like anyone of us want another democracy anyways. The whole "puppet" jingo always bothers me anyways.

<You might be letting polmemes and/or Axis apologism cloud your skull.

>You're lettings shekels cloud your skull, that's for sure.

<proceeding to babble about kikes anyways

Proving me right. Mind you, I am Maurras posting. I don't take Axis/Ally side, I am pro-monarchy.

>finding faults with an individual monarch makes you a demotist

Your faults are kinda crap. I don't see why you have these standards are so bad. The Shah looks like any ideal strongman you people usually babble about. I only see people with a particular bias and a particular bone to pick with this particular monarch.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3762

File: 9ef57489520d079⋯.jpg (20.52 KB,337x254,337:254,Charles Maurras.jpg)

As Maurras poster, I'm gonna clarify I am not >>3757 him.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3765

>>3760

>The Chinese hasn't reached anywhere near the level of domination the British and Americans had achieved prior to the revolution (establishing economic spheres of influence and overthrowing Iran's government at a whim).

>Letting foreigners meddle is okay when they're not Whitey

>You're lettings shekels cloud your skull, that's for sure.

>muh kikes

Did past Muslim rulers include Jews in their domain Y/N

>>finding faults with an individual monarch makes you a demotist

Combined with your strongman fetishization and yapping about demotist notions of "charisma" and "merit" yes it does.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3777

>>2396

There's Imperial Iran, pro-Pahlavi videos in the music thread, tbh.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3780

File: 9a5406207aff262⋯.jpg (18.13 KB,408x408,1:1,1506624300038.jpg)

>>3714

>triggered

I think you mean "rustled".

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 5dc76f3e641841e⋯.jpg (97.71 KB,671x427,11:7,Carl_von_Clausewitz.jpg)

 No.2633 [Open thread][Last50 Posts]

I want to request a favor for the board's sake. We need to get a monarchy-chan, a qt imperialist waifu for all the anons. This would be a cordial service.

107 posts and 50 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3086

File: a652818840453ce⋯.png (119.65 KB,375x443,375:443,Grace_chan_2.png)

New art.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3186

File: 0d58b71e0fcdaa0⋯.png (64.37 KB,442x442,1:1,Monarchist_chan.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3631

File: 9993c2c58456ac5⋯.png (235.16 KB,371x398,371:398,absolutely_disgusted_redco….png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3633

>>3631

Still assblasted you didn't get a husbando?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3644

File: c1f1d1d0bad24bb⋯.png (53.52 KB,183x267,61:89,mike_what.png)

>>3633

Who are you talking about? Is it wrong that I found your that anon's words degenerate?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: fdf5c1ff9e78f5a⋯.jpg (115.95 KB,890x652,445:326,DIUBHIGUIAESoX5.jpg)

File: 743324742243c4e⋯.jpg (596.23 KB,850x1200,17:24,Anzai.Chiyomi.jpg)

 No.3327 [Open thread]

The political animals like to view everything pre-1917 as primitive and despotic. Their view of our reactionary world is unpalatable. They claim their revolutionary magic "modernized" the world. Yet the history of the world is majestic. Reactionaries have a much brighter view of the past and the monarchies. We'll change their despotic view of the past. Let's de-enlighten them.

in other words, how do we brainwash /leftypol/ into serving our greater cause?

we're stealing /fascist/'s waifu until we find out

13 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3374

File: f820bd81cadb0ab⋯.png (202.35 KB,266x339,266:339,1465751031650.png)

>>3373

not an argument fag

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3375

File: bb2994e2f9bcff9⋯.gif (444.33 KB,540x405,4:3,bb2994e2f9bcff938c0d11ff99….gif)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3596

>>3327

>in other words, how do we brainwash /leftypol/ into serving our greater cause?

Most people stopped believing in Communism once the actual communists took over and they realized they were used like a wet condom

>see: 90% of Eastern Europe, Nork escapees, Venezuelans

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3598

File: 9fb21d83efbbae3⋯.gif (1002.22 KB,500x463,500:463,51295d.gif)

>>3596

Now if only people would wake up to how awful the world is under democracy and republicanism.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3616

>>3327

Bumping

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

 No.1076 [Open thread]

Where does /monarchy/ stand on the whole Catalonia secession crisis? Do you stand with the thoughts of King Felipe VI, or of Prince Hans Adams II?

24 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2520

>>1273

Germany is a jewish puppet that does not want good things for Germany. Silesia used to be completely German before the jews took it from us and gave it to Poland, all the while stealing eastern Poland and giving it to themselves.

>>1299

There is no treason to an illegitimate government. All of eastern Germany is rightfully German, Silesia being part of it. The Poles living there being illegitimate occupants.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2545

>>1076

Catalonia is a rightful part of the kingdom of Spain. As are Castille, Leon and Portugal. If the Catalans want to secede part of a nation and reestablish a monarchy they'd have to pick Both Sicilies.

>>1081

And that's why your kind gets the same bullet as your socialist friends. Enjoy your helicopter ride.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3572

File: cef372efb9283c0⋯.png (693.29 KB,785x591,785:591,AntiCatalan.png)

An independent Catalonia, due to it's overt association with leftist politics, is an insult to the Spanish nation and the principles of Carlism!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3573

>>3572

Agreed. Fuck separatist cucks.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3580

>>1160

>This is probably a "no homo" aside, but the King looks fucking amazing. He looks like how I imagined El Cid to look like.

And now please be glad that Otto von Habsburg didn't accept the crown when Franco offered it to him

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 8c2fbbe16900f7e⋯.jpg (199.43 KB,1109x1169,1109:1169,Thomas Hobbes Portrait.jpg)

 No.995 [Open thread]

General thread for discussing Thomas Hobbes. He is, after all, the monarchist thinker that most people have heard of. Or rather, there are far more, but he's the one everyone thinks of when you say "monarchist philosopher".

I've always had a weird respect for Thomas Hobbes, weird because I disagree with him on almost everything, from his view on human nature, to his epistemics, to his contract theory. What impressed me in Leviathan, however, were his stringency. He carefully laid down all his premises, answered all the obvious questions he knew his reader would have, and argued with care and precision. This is why it's so easy to point out just where he went wrong. I can't say the same for many other philosophies.

What relatively few critics of Leviathan understand is that Hobbes is essentially an individualist, not a collectivist and not a totalitarian. He even acknowledged a right of resistance, said that the state should further the commonweal by protecting society from crime instead of trying to run society, and he never made any claims to the effect that individuals are merely cells of some greater whole. It would go too far to call him a classical liberal, but really, he wasn't so bad.

18 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3084

>>3079

The only language they understand is violence. It applies to every government. The thing they leave out is that violence is met with violence.

I'd like to know how someone could leave a system. If you know where in the book, tell me. I think the best you can do is emigrate or socially isolate yourself. If you commit the worst crimes in the realm, even if you didn't consent to the laws, it is sensible that someone would subject you. I don't think what Hobbes presents is too far-fetched than it's received.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3092

File: f8f1747820c1ea1⋯.jpg (1.46 MB,2576x1932,4:3,Hobbes_on_Honor_1.jpg)

File: 0db07da81042cb4⋯.jpg (1.6 MB,2576x1932,4:3,Hobbes_on_Honor_2.jpg)

Dumping read caps. Planning to simplify them.

I think I'll look into what Hobbes thought. We should look into other thinkers like Filmer and Maistre, maybe even make them a thread to discuss. For now, I'm going to prolong my study on Hobbes.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3577

>>995

Hobbes is also an individualist in the sense that he also calls for loyalty to an individual, a leviathan, rather than ideals and morality and some kind of NAP. In ways, Hobbes separates from the classical knowledge and reforms it. Hobbes expanded on the ideal of chivalry and vassalship so well. He understood that authority must come between a ruler and a subject, and that it requires leadership to have this kind of hierarchy. And all leadership is faulty and all justice in this world requires a leader to sovereign to determine the laws and bridge it down through their authority.

And anarchists, republicans, and other idealists? They don't understand the concept of being loyal to an individual to begin with. They are the worst political animals. They construct constitutions and try to check and balance everything, believing that these laws are necessary. The problem is a government isn't about liberty and no authority – even a constitution – allows for the best liberty FROM other people! All liberty ceases to be true liberty when other people are involved and take away the atomized individual that the anarcho-kiddos worship. And for liberty to truly mandate itself in a civil society, there must be an authority. The consequence is people have a right to all things and each others' bodies.

What is authoritarian isn't bad at all, and it brings civil liberty between people and reconciles their conflicts to help promote harmony and love between an authority and people's liberty. The danger is totalitarian government that believes in the general will of Rousseau and popular mandates and the will of the mob. People take Hobbes for an atheist and part of that is rhetoric spawned from his enemies. Hobbes believed in social contract through consent to obey, divine mandate as portrayed in the Bible of social consent – AS God presenting a people with a king – and Hobbes puts this loyalty to justice central to his political theory as long as a sovereign provides protection in a Commonwealth.

While I appreciate most of Hobbes' political theory as "our social contract theorist" for monarchists, I don't agree with the ideaPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3578

Sir Robert Filmer deserves credit for conceptualizing monarchy in the most fairest sense that forms a nation from family, to tribe, to nation. A monarchy is quintessentially a family and a dynasty that rules over. What libertarians don't understand about this authority is it is the most benevolent authority. It starts with a paternal incentive to take care of offspring, and the virtues of this role; it also means that property is taken care of and safeguarded fundamentally as the monarch prescribes order and justice from the threshold of a household… by means of inheritance and natural hereditary practice.

They laugh at a monarch's inheritance as rulership, yet they don't understand how this form of government secures the rights of manhood and teaches us obedience. Before obedience and honor, rights have no fundamental place in society. Never lose sight of loyalty to someone.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3579

Despite everything anarchists say about social contract theory and how they dislike it, I don't believe them. Modern politics is based on social contract theory. These anarchists all talk through these modern political means and think like republicans. They don't conceptualize the Divine Right of Kings or any contrarian ideals. They simply want "their state" instead of the dominant state.

The political hacks online and their political compasses need to screw off with their ideologies.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 4c835780dda47cc⋯.jpg (26.12 KB,620x412,155:103,elliot.jpg)

 No.3442 [Open thread]

Why should a monarch care about promoting modernisation, taking care of the poor, or staying out of futile wars?

Of course he might- but on the other hand, he may only build palaces, enrich himself and his relations, and wage war to expand the domain of his exploitation.

A Republic operated by and for the people seems more likely to create the first kind of Ruler than pure chance. You may try to argue that Republics are simply controlled by money, but in fact Continental Europe has very stringent laws about political donations.

22 posts and 14 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3481

>>3477

A crown is akin to a constitution in that it is another authority that is about sovereign justice. You focus on the king, but not the monarchy. While the king is the monarchy, the monarchy itself is present as an authority.

>>3473

Money is spent to be used. Money is circulated throughout the whole economy. To pander with politics and promises, I say, the politician leads people astray. You mentioned Hobbes >>3471 and it meant multiplied pandering to a BIGGER mass. A democracy operates on pandering for votes and public support, and to gain such public support it means to pander and sell other people out in favor of your people – your multitude.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3482

Harmony is also compliance and love of government enough. I'm going back to your central question because I'm growing bored. If you truly want to know the motives of a monarch, I will being with >>3442 your prompt again. You ask, "why?"

>why should a monarch care

Because the monarch is the successor of his ancestors. The monarch inherits the legacy of his household. This paternal authority is the same paternal authority that men hold as fathers. This ancestral wisdom is a source of inspiration and influence on the monarch. Great monarchs look back to their ancestors to guide them. Their tradition is following the actions their hereditary parents took and their achievements.

The monarch also owns the country as its sovereign. It is the monarch's estate to visit and take care of. It is his life office.

As sovereign of a people, the title bears that the monarch is theirs and since the monarch is responsible for them, the monarch has this to remember that the sovereignty of a land changes and goes between the men in history.

The discipline of monarchs is their God and Divine Right to this office. Their authority and right is sanctified from a divine mandate and this proceeds to resemble all rights by a crown. This is an office of virtue for them.

Monarchs are akin to paternal authority. When I say harmony, it is their love and responsibility to stay with a people.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3483

File: 7342bd9f9d1ef95⋯.jpg (45.08 KB,581x432,581:432,Bossuet_royalauthority.jpg)

When I speak of "subject to Reason"… I refer to Bossuet and his properties of royal authority. It doesn't matter what an assembly thinks is reasonable or what The People™ think if the monarch is being reasonable. Say, a monarch goes and says, "I will shoot myself in the head and live." Does it, and doesn't live; he is subject to reason. Everything is subject to reason.

If you want a concise answer, Hobbes does address this issue in Leviathan. Even though a person could be dragged to court, the subject has the ability to speak on his behalf.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3484

File: 67efb8beb73529c⋯.jpg (208.33 KB,805x1044,805:1044,13748d36fe83bd7ad5350b0dcd….jpg)

The problem with democracy is its totalitarian instinct. It calls upon the masses, seeks to control the masses, and seeks to manifest through the total will of the masses. This is the great multitude. It focuses on the masses for partisanship. It seeks to propagandize way more than a monarchy does. A monarchy is an authoritative government that doesn't call upon the masses in such a way. While Hobbes believes the sovereign is already the total consent of the people, it is still an authoritative control and isn't in the delusional state of "getting power through masses in political pandering while the door is still open". His consent is totally different as people consent moreso than just saying they agree. It is what they do. But the terror of democracy is the thought of the multitude and multitude only. Two gigantic waves clashing and pouring. The desire to control the People entirely by means of democracy and justification through voting startles me. The aspiration of totality disturbs me.

A monarch looks to an authority. The consentual basis is much toned and relates to responsibility as an office rather than a game of control and politics. Like I often say, Hobbes' consentual ideal isn't my idea as much and it's one of the things I disagree with him about. I prefer Maistre's explanation of a mixed answer; because it is true that the sovereignty of a nation is a combination of the people and their sovereign. It is also the authority. What is authoritarian is much better than what is totalitarian in aspiration. I used to talk with MM (Mad Monarchist), and I recall him saying that he agrees more with Filmer (who wrote Patriarcha) than Hobbes. The patriarchalists focused on paternal authority as an expansive thing – from family, to tribe, to nation. It sounds like a much more benevolent form. While Hobbes' social contract theory is really foundational for many governments.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3489

File: 7c9176a5e59e4ec⋯.jpg (140.87 KB,1200x715,240:143,DH4FRXHUIAABM80.jpg)

Honestly, OP, I don't know what else you would like. Go hence and return to your world of boring politicians and their orator ways.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 2d9c972e10acaa1⋯.png (31.86 KB,600x600,1:1,anarcho_monarchism_by_myli….png)

 No.460 [Open thread]

I've always wondered if there is more common ground between the advocates of traditional monarchy and anarchists than most people think.

It feels to me like often anarchists are reacting against is the same as what monarchists who admire something more medieval or early modern feel has gone wrong since the collapse of monarchist attitudes.

38 posts and 13 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1248

>>1246

>You're all appealing to Anarcho-Capitalism

You say this like it's a bad thing.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1249

>>1248

No I don't. I say that like it is a narrow way of appealing to all anarchists. I say that like if you need different tactics to appeal to different sects of anarchism.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1267

File: d7b412d31f3312f⋯.mp4 (6.03 MB,320x240,4:3,monarchy.mp4)

Monarchy vs Anarchy in the nutshell.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.1325

>>618

>This thread is incredibly disappointing but I should not be surprised, people here doesn't seem to know what anarchism even is.

I'm also disappointed but for different reasons. >>545 is literally the only post I've seen in this thread that actually explains the similarities between anarchy and monarchy. >>467 is a neat resource but they didn't explain anything themselves. Otherwise, every post before yours has been explaining how Monarchists can subvert anarchist language/movements to further their goals, or their respective histories. We've diverted far beyond the thread's initial topic anyway though, so it isn't like it even matters anymore.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3383

adafs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 1433279898931.jpg (336.11 KB,1280x859,1280:859,rrg8t0o1_1280.jpg)

 No.170 [Open thread]

1. Make banners and/or flags

2. Upload them itt

3. I will use said banners and/or flags

Go.

25 posts and 13 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
Post last edited at

 No.826

File: 74e757d32ce648a⋯.pdf (104.88 KB,borges.pdf)

test

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.830

>>826

And more thanks!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.986

It seems like new threads will have flags.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3322

File: 99c61aa5e8ac4c3⋯.jpg (14.06 KB,300x100,3:1,23897832946.jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3323

File: 62c30ae9a555410⋯.jpg (19.81 KB,300x100,3:1,STOP_Thinking_like_republi….jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: e7b1b04d27d705f⋯.jpg (134.96 KB,267x400,267:400,....jpg)

 No.3220 [Open thread]

The electorate has children as well as the monarch. So why believe that monarchies will tend to care more about the future? It's an argument that fails from the beginning.

European democracies invest in education, protect the environment, and run budget surpluses. These are verifiable facts. It's only America that doesn't care about these things and that is run by money not votes.

6 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3232

>>3226

>You do not seem to be woke on the jews I assume?

I am aware that atheist Jews are slightly more liberal than regular atheists, but that's about it.

>Are you retarded?

Verifiable facts.

>>3227

The vast majority of people have at least one child.

>>3228

> I'm not saying the general populace doesn't have an incentive to take care of their own, but democracies easily push that narrative aside with whatever pandering they bring to the public to receive those votes.

I don't think that's how it works. Parties could in theory try to skew people to think in the short term but they would then lose against parties that appeal to how people already think. Changing people's minds is very hard.

Accusing the other party of being irresponsible, unconcerned with debt they're leaving to grandkids, etc. is quite a common approach.

>the democratic system doesn't consist of families

No, but voters exist in families. I think you're exaggerating the importance of the distinction.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3233

>>3232

>I am aware that atheist Jews are slightly more liberal

You really are retarded, right?

>Verifiable facts.

My sides

>The vast majority of people have at least one child.

*if they're not white

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3234

File: 2ca75ecbec3e53d⋯.jpg (180.36 KB,867x1025,867:1025,Freedom_1.jpg)

>>3232

>Parties could in theory try to skew people

They do. They push people to vote without thinking. Sometimes through sheer propaganda campaigns against their enemy candidate. Sometimes the political parties televise it and accuse their candidate without much of an argument. The ideal is to gather all the votes to gain power and get as many tickets into the ballet box.

>changing people's minds is very hard

Yeah, and it frankly doesn't matter what anyone really thinks. It's just a charade.

>Accusing the other party of being irresponsible, unconcerned with debt they're leaving to grandkids, etc.

Nah, that's just another tactic and long-term strategy. Often the parties who do that go on to make their own debts anyways once they seize power.

>voters exist in families

Listen, I'm not denying this. But a democracy isn't structurally incorporating this. A democracy doesn't always appeal to this. There is a foresight between generations, but also resentment between generations through the voting block. Against old generations. Against boomers. Against millennial generations. Against two spheres of the household thanks to men vs woman politics considering what tension exists with feminism. Yes, this system has whacked apart this structure through the conceit of either member to have power. And then you have other politicized events that foster rebellion among members of the public to support weird causes…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3235

I would rather have an autocratic government than a democracy because I don't appreciate the effects on the populace to become voters. Becoming a voter depreciates a person, imo. Voting for minor issues like weed and whether this should be legal seems to gravitate towards the minds of the public – the issues that matter the least. Not to mention the hatred and tension it broils within the populace and what it makes two bipartisan members, sometimes a father and a son – feel when they were both members of a different political party.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3236

File: afd5e76f8a879c1⋯.jpg (117.72 KB,1280x794,640:397,DQ6DqF3WkAElMCC.jpg)

File: df6627ecc9721f5⋯.jpg (113.45 KB,446x572,223:286,Charles_Maurras.jpg)

>>3232

A hereditary monarchy is the transfer of power from father to son, and a democracy is a popularity contest. Which system has foresight for the future? A popularity contest is the full display of how entertains the ideals of the crowd, and the generational cycle within a monarchy is their tradition. That tradition is the wisdom of generations to continue with their offspring, as the people do themselves. But how does a popularity contest reveal diligence and commitment to that tradition? Majority rule is a fanciful idea until the majority starts collapsing on each other about who should carry their mantle, then half the country delves against the other half. Then their ideals become paramount more than their tradition. Ideology and its framework misleads people from this common wisdom. Teaches them to become anything but a people, but rather a different kind of people – a different kind of partisan – a different kind of idealist – a different kind of person. Loyalty to a party is ill-begotten misery for a populace over the other party, whose electorate equally resent that party. These ideological games aren't a service to any people…

>democracy

Democracy is erratic like the ideology it uses. Ideals drift away and back. Ideals are like personal thoughts; remembered and forgotten! The worst part about democracy is its totalitarian-leaning as a monarchy has its authoritarian-leaning. The ideals and demand for the will of the people leads to totalitarian antics to rule the minds and will of people as a total. This is the authority of the government to swindle you and control you for their democratic zeal.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 2f200825e26cfc2⋯.jpg (83.63 KB,1200x630,40:21,otto strasser.jpg)

 No.2671 [Open thread]

How does /monarchy/ justify hereditary monarchies? I personally think a state should be lead by the best person possible for the job based on merit. Obviously being the son of a king and inheriting the throne does not make the son necessarily a good ruler. Do supporters of hereditary monarchies not care about merit at all and just want a single line of succession based solely on something as banal as muh tradition? I see no problem with elective monarchs ruling for life and elected based on merit, but I can't see the drive to have hereditary monarchies in this day and age. Explain it to me.

Pic slightly related, Otto Strasser advocated for an elective monarchy in Germany

5 posts omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2741

The first true Guti ruler who could be called "king" was Inkishush. He was the one to establish a system where each ruler was followed by another shortly after, with the previous one remaining in power behind the scenes. The Guti term for a ruler is شواسك (šwasək), literally "self-rule" but not necessarily with an autocratic implication but that of being free to decide what one wants and to do it. The ancient system allowed anybody to become "king" if they proved themselves fit but there was also a hereditary succession in case the "elected" ruler failed the people. This system was somewhat similar to the Chinese concept of "heavenly mandate". It was the most functional system in history until Tirigan the cuck betrayed his people and destroyed the Guti spirit for independence. Even after thousands of years we have not recovered. It makes me sad that we can never return to the greatest system. It was a working combination of hereditary monarchy, meritocracy and anarchy. It was perfect but we will never have it again.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2784

Let me make a few points.

#1. The monarchy seeks to foster the roles of leadership. When an heir succeeds the throne and wears the crown, there are many influences calling out for the heir to be responsible. From the start, the heir had loyalty and honorable ceremonies promoting the ascending throne. Imagine a shape of a triangle and a fluid falling into shape: likewise, the monarchy seeks to set up every reason for good leadership. The monarch has to master all roles of proper leadership as the monarch gains authority. Responsibility is the chief concern for a monarchist to look after, because authority is the monarch's responsibility. It was always true that with great power comes great responsibility.

#2. (This point depends on the state of a society, considering this factor may become good or bad). – The monarch is well educated and prepared throughout a life, following the household legacy of the predecessors of the throne. This argument used to be very valid with good private tutors, but nowadays the modern monarchs are being forced into normal (((education))) that separates the heir from being an outsider and mysterious force of reverence. There is some good reason for a monarchy to maintain a respect distance from its people, being that the media will try to make them into celebrities or this could potentially cause the public to lose respect. The chief issue with this education is institutions no longer provide adequate education, and since private tutors are being made a taboo for monarchies… it does no service.

#3. Monarchy is inherently a system of proper leadership. It depends on the monarch becoming a father and taking up ceremonies. Despite how much modernism seeks to distort what the modern family is and what people should value, the structure of monarchy itself prevents this misconduct with its own integrity. It will not prevent bad monarchs, but it surely gives a boost.

My last word on this is meritocracy and hereditary leadership aren't contradictory terms. These two things can work. Aristocracy doesn't contradict meritocracy either because aristocracy is often born out of it.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3196

Aristocracy is meritocracy with a lower time-preference.

With a meritocracy, you, an individual must be great.

With an aristocracy, you, your son, and his son must all be great, ad infinitum.

It is absolutely the case that families, even royalty lose the mandate of heavene, though this is usually manifested by conquest.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3203

>>3196

>Aristocracy is meritocracy with a lower time-preference.

This is going in my quote book.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3205

>>2671

>I personally think a state should be lead by the best person possible for the job based on merit

the person with so much 'merit' will just have overconfidence, ignore his ancestors and those around him, propose shitty schemes to try to make everything better, probably fuck things up.

tradition is better and a monarchy leads to tradition. first, all power in a monarchy derives from the past, inspiring a respect for tradition and ancestors. second a leader not chosen on merit will be less likely to believe he can fix everything, nor will people listen to him, leading to further preservation of tradition. third, monarchy acts as a visual metaphor for tradition as the tradition of ruling is passed down from father to son (rather than each generation of ruler trying to work it out for himself)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 7a42c5d5fd1f732⋯.jpg (120.49 KB,638x479,638:479,typesofmonarchy.jpg)

 No.2042 [Open thread]

Please explain whether you support absolute or constitutional monarchy, and hereditary vs elective monarchy.

Please explain what the constitution should state, and how the monarch should be elected, OR explain why you do not want these things.

Also, just to get this out of the way: this sub is the most autistic shit I have ever found on the internet and you all should be subjected to electroshock.

I support the Singapore model as the ideal form of government. If you cannot see the parallels between this model, fascism, and "elective constitutional monarchy", you are autistic. But then again, you are on this sub, and so you are already a piece of shit.

14 posts and 7 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2115

File: 3cc97950fc6bc98⋯.jpg (7.4 KB,200x275,8:11,jinyuzhang_narrowweb__200x….jpg)

File: c0c45c866ce5865⋯.png (285.26 KB,1200x800,3:2,1200px-Flag_of_the_Qing_Dy….png)

我想念老发型

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2120

>>2115

That's hebrew, right?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2122

File: 9f8f6d52b8c1a5c⋯.png (325.77 KB,490x333,490:333,ClipboardImage.png)

>>2042

>Also, just to get this out of the way: this sub is the most autistic shit I have ever found on the internet and you all should be subjected to electroshock.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3197

>this sub

>>>/reddit/

Kindly refer yourself to the gallows.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3204

Reddit thread

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: c2dbe565f8924a2⋯.jpeg (24.83 KB,350x236,175:118,img.jpeg)

 No.1959 [Open thread]

An Ancien Regime pardon my butchery of accents anon suggested I make a thread, and I decided to do one comparing and contrasting our different viewpoints. Thus, the format will be as the following:

1) Name/Type (Your flag)

2) Description (ideally)

3) Is this a classed system? What are they and who inhabits these classes? What are the duties of the classes?

4) Benefits of your supported system

5) Problems with your supported system

Then you must optimally resolve the following issues under and according to your supported system: (Note you are not necessarily the king but can describe what the king, magistrate, governor, or constable/policeman would do in such a situation to resolve said issue.

1) (Bundle or ignore where applicable due to the existence of or lack of classes)

a) A noble has committed a crime against a commoner.

b) A commoner has committed a crime against a noble.

c) A noble has committed a crime against a noble.

d) A commoner has committed a crime against a commoner.

2) A travelling trader having a dispute with a citizen, the trader is a foreigner. The nature of the dispute is ambiguous to you at the current time.

3) The population is growing large, and a majority commute to their place of work. A system of transportation may be funded (or not).

4) The country is under threat from a foreign power or invader and the standing army is either insufficient or non-existent.

5) (in this scenario) you are king, but currently your reputation is mud. How do you resolve this?

6) The crown needs money, how is it raised?

7) Private citizens are carrying arms, and their purpose is ambiguous. What, if anything, is done?

8) The number of unemployed poor is rising due to the prevalence of either slave labor or some kind of labor reducing technology. What, if anything, is done to resolve this poverty and starvation?

9) The king has proven himself an ineffective rulePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

14 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.2054

File: d64f3b3a3ae8003⋯.jpg (89.04 KB,768x1024,3:4,Statue_d'Alfred_le_Grand_à….jpg)

There is no option for non-hannover England unfortunately

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3163

File: b1349261026fac1⋯.png (193.6 KB,500x800,5:8,Anarcho monarchism.png)

>>1977

>>1978

>>1979

5 months is a bit of a length to make a rebuttal to anything but as an Anarcho-Monarchist I just thought I should chime in.

The retard here is not an Anarcho-Monarchist. he's an Ancap with some weird delusion that everyone would agree that some rando would be their king.

Actual Anarcho-Monarchism is the belief that in the event that the state be abolished the demand for a government would still exist, and as a result of said demand there would be a supply of land owners i.e Monarchs offering partial authority over partials of their land bundled with various other benefits ranging from police too postal services in exchange for rent, or "taxes" of some kind.

It basically stems from the idea that every man is the absolute ruler of his own self, and as an extension the absolute ruler of any land under his ownership. This other guy is a straight up retard.

(I'm not the author of the book but I thought it would be attention grabbing)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3183

File: b5b813caab22780⋯.png (175.9 KB,514x617,514:617,mindblown.png)

>>3163

>Actual Anarcho-Monarchism

We're like ten guys online and don't even know each other. It's a bit soon to talk about "actual" and "wrong" anarchomonarchism.

>The retard here is not an Anarcho-Monarchist. he's an Ancap with some weird delusion that everyone would agree that some rando would be their king.

That's the same as saying ancaps are retards who would agree to the NAP. No, that's not how it works. It is never the case that "everyone" agrees with some new custom or law. Spontaneous order and all that.

>some rando

Not even sure what that burn was, to be quite honest. What did I say that sounded remotely randian?

>Actual Anarcho-Monarchism is the belief that in the event that the state be abolished the demand for a government would still exist, and as a result of said demand there would be a supply of land owners i.e Monarchs offering partial authority over partials of their land bundled with various other benefits ranging from police too postal services in exchange for rent, or "taxes" of some kind.

Which is also a possible model that I would be fine with, but how would that be more likely than one very capable and trustworthy judge settling fundamental disputes of the kind I mentioned, or one military commander becoming de facto supreme commander and then de facto highest judge? It all depends on historical accidents. We might end up completely without any monarch at all. Technological progress might end up favoring flat hierarchies and moderate income disparity. Galt's Gulch might coexist with your model and my model.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3184

>>1972

>>1973

>Who is Tolkien

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3185

>>1977

What is that symbol?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



File: 585797a519c8fe5⋯.jpg (75.18 KB,650x458,325:229,TSarskaya-semya-nakanune-a….jpg)

 No.2414 [Open thread]

Shit's so fucked up bruhs. I'm not certain we'll be able to see anything like it happening in the near future unless Varg is right and some apocalypse will save us.

Me, I kinda have a small plan, we know that there are certain factors that turn people into leftists, like big cities and especially colleges where by their first year people are already turned into braindead leftists. Now what do we have that has the opposite effect on people and drastically converts them into traditionalists? I think if we can figure that out or at least start with wrestling the universities back from the leftists and educating kids the RIGHT way, we might have a chance eventually, but it will still take some time to undo the leftist damage and social engineering.

What else is there? Revolution? I think this is also a viable option since we can safely ignore the opinion of 80% of the population, but it should only be done when the right-wing is more organized and in a more favourable position, I personally don't believe in the whole -

>revolutions are bad and always make things worse

thing, this is a really lazy argument, revolutions themselves aren't necessarily bad, it depends on who wins them and what they decide to do after.

Any other ideas?

26 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click [Open thread] to view. ____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3136

>>3135

If the flag's name is a reference to that song, it's wrong, but why? Is there a reason, or was it just a mistake?

https://madmonarchist.blogspot.com/2018/01/in-defense-of-modern-monarchs.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3137

>>3135

>I just don't get it

It's egalitarianism. It was bound to happen as soon as they made marrying commoners acceptable more and more.

These problems aren't sourced in the royalty. It is the same problem with many people. They're more susceptible because private tutoring is becoming less an option, because the state of academia, and because society is in decay. Before that can be fixed, you have to take care of many problems first.

Likewise, if you want ordinary people to become better, you couldn't simply just exterminate them all and call in new people.

I'd agree how the royals are mostly lacking, and I'm skeptical the same way. I'm treating it like growing pains, hoping that monarchies will grow out of it if they don't bastardize their dynasties anymore.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3139

>>3135

>Britbong prince marries jewish mysterymeat used goods

If I were in his shoes I'd have them raised from birth to be the perfect genetically engineered wives that are totally customized to my taste but it might be challenging to not see them as my daughters.

>>3137

I think that acting like they're married to commoners is just a job to them and it's just there to symbolically show to the public that it's not just the prince who's getting married, but also the British people who's destinies are now tied to raceless shitskins. These royal families probably have dungeons and mansions all over the place for them to lead secret lives full of degenerate sex (I'm not an expert, but I think this is what masonic lodges are for too).

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3140

>>3139

Wew.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

 No.3141

>>2414

Wouldn't we have to wait until the society became more patriarchal? The Iroquois's society reflected their matriarchal structure, so surely a monarchist counter-revolution would have to come about after society returned to it's patriarchal roots.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



Delete Post [ ]
[]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Random
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]